Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When to send the SETTINGS frame (#2945)

Kazuho Oku <> Thu, 08 August 2019 05:36 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715241200B2 for <>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 22:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.382
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.382 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_24=1.618, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MAILING_LIST_MULTI=-1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u5nJcBcmnY6n for <>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 22:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E02A1200A4 for <>; Wed, 7 Aug 2019 22:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2019 22:36:56 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=pf2014; t=1565242616; bh=utbFez/RSd+cv2lerC8AkYc33oZnaIg1nhDf1KvkfvE=; h=Date:From:Reply-To:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:List-ID: List-Archive:List-Post:List-Unsubscribe:From; b=A8fyBkRazL0TxId9f5rkv9tGXVbafw+epdvk84QQZj+QX72QYZ05cJzVLiwf/5RoI QmiyUaPBBxKAb6TumCu7mPWxdJMNk00KCAdooAucqCTwCQSKWLHhCh8AWrkklueo4F uFt6DXMXzFnjgx/xrdb76F3EpoED8SXi7Lc3VFB4=
From: Kazuho Oku <>
Reply-To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
To: quicwg/base-drafts <>
Cc: Subscribed <>
Message-ID: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2945/>
In-Reply-To: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
References: <quicwg/base-drafts/issues/>
Subject: Re: [quicwg/base-drafts] When to send the SETTINGS frame (#2945)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--==_mimepart_5d4bb4f84d264_5b5d3feae42cd9681252e6"; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: list
X-GitHub-Sender: kazuho
X-GitHub-Recipient: quic-issues
X-GitHub-Reason: subscribed
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Notification list for GitHub issues related to the QUIC WG <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Aug 2019 05:36:58 -0000

It seems that the argument against #2958 is asymmetry.

Then, I might have a suggestion. How about defining a QUIC frame for exchanging application-protocol settings, that is transmitted using Handshake packets? That would make the protocol design symmetric, at the same time guaranteeing delivery of the settings prior to application data.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: