From nobody Tue Aug 2 10:34:23 2022 Return-Path: X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C27EC138FCA for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:34:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.107 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CWMXBAH-fv8t for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-vk1-xa36.google.com (mail-vk1-xa36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::a36]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB803C13C529 for ; Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:34:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk1-xa36.google.com with SMTP id v13so4616710vke.3 for ; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:34:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc; bh=hDpwzJoBn6dqnZ3UII+v53irAoV5UE4PLKs1AGp0fuY=; b=S7cRcYHfyi0bSdMblTouazDyAjMOSGPthwtDGiTJQN4u+4Kd1WEJe5Xrac7wwo1MyZ dzzN1Xlj7BfbEYokOrSm4j5lds7rIUkkalkq+JAl0oHejgHWSO3nMNcnJE/p663Iwv6g 9xhGxd2x8CHGST1rTCEVt5dmJcX37CbnBqoSbBBN9bJTPjqXj5MRBwrp8z6nG+Mj6PBj nBijxo7IqGQ27Ix95xT2w1pg5YiyxFYnnBzN2EqIaBOWJ5lNJUQiTI3dy5DcocXoiA7j tehBdF9euso/I3VffzoTS3mJf2xS5t3TrV6i/7YaY3kSTnhrJJezdslxi275KkteD2zP n8pA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc; bh=hDpwzJoBn6dqnZ3UII+v53irAoV5UE4PLKs1AGp0fuY=; b=EthJqq8KSZzHGIvtGSRWDuwQyUr1TSh36zqz8/ipxNXEEWKAvRwArbqRGARbWnCq08 LHm2FMLwPoMfVpEeO7eGYvJKn8gKPmOkpRBv2stQjy4euMHKrvgrk8dKQ3wkEjsRt1b2 wNcP1XwGHX0bP+sPidkGsXugPCXyFXtjYLky1lErNk9QW0bjn5l+ZZZBhb1teWlRCg2g VEfhllCXqnOwJp5PyHhWltGT5pVy01FhsW7DSBtsdSDqpKUCuDbHJnQNfbTAe9R+RAoE nWUfHZrlxzsos3TV57yKFbDRT5WM/VELqqpNUVD7b0gsrVva2noNg1cNNUtbdJewMWGs rk8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8ikPsZ7JZL39nINI/5kpd+NVTg6TIvCQlN/mWnS+BX3RpKecOZ t3WBKEWH9/qOHFniynwt6Bgyw+F0oPitcgQ9M8Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1vvh4gg0h6g9xpvQkbgkSinaWzwM1am4qaHazglTrmGYFlX3myxVZLtkXwRkgr36XP6QeOuVO+/8coQ9oAs8NI= X-Received: by 2002:a1f:ac50:0:b0:375:f4d4:9ace with SMTP id v77-20020a1fac50000000b00375f4d49acemr8388638vke.36.1659461660724; Tue, 02 Aug 2022 10:34:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <557981c8-a33a-4ecf-9d72-88016009a55a@www.fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <557981c8-a33a-4ecf-9d72-88016009a55a@www.fastmail.com> From: Martin Duke Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 10:34:08 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Requesting sanity check on QUIC Bit draft To: Martin Thomson Cc: IETF QUIC WG , Zaheduzzaman Sarker Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce53f905e5458601" Archived-At: X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2022 17:34:22 -0000 --000000000000ce53f905e5458601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Zahed is on vacation, but LGTM On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 7:51 AM Martin Thomson wrote: > The RPC identified an inconsistency in draft-ietf-quic-bit-grease with > respect to how it treats QUIC versions. > > I've opened a pull request to capture the AUTH48 comments ( > https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/32/files), which include a > change to some of the framing text. Can I request a sanity check on those > changes? > > > https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/32/commits/851f1907bfdab3f0216ff171b0dc8ce1bcb4373a > > I don't know if this is substantial enough to require AD approval, but I'm > ccing Zahed anyway, who is then in a position to decide. > > --000000000000ce53f905e5458601 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Zahed is on vacation, but LGTM

On Thu, Jul 28, 2022 at 7:51= AM Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.n= et> wrote:
https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/32/files), which include a change to some of the framing text.=C2=A0 Can I reques= t a sanity check on those changes?

ht= tps://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease/pull/32/commits/851f1907bfdab3f0216= ff171b0dc8ce1bcb4373a

I don't know if this is substantial enough to require AD approval, but = I'm ccing Zahed anyway, who is then in a position to decide.

--000000000000ce53f905e5458601--