IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-quic-version-negotiation

Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> Wed, 11 December 2019 23:10 UTC

Return-Path: <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D4512018D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:10:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hOUEuHZS8mhM for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:10:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x236.google.com (mail-lj1-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90241120178 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:10:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x236.google.com with SMTP id e10so49258ljj.6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:10:09 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=cyLO6sWo1Hb3nZ1NxugwQEJhcOCMyVJg6fuYJ3CIgus=; b=TKbcy3d9UL1mlryNy2DAcTK3jAZ6ospE6BLTbhdT0al/xFNiQTSW/r6Kg9BwqF8A21 mc/niBQHMWVurZZD64bWd2Rjvv5XKeVQv2b9gOq5ps3NNHtNlCS/9U8U9//vA/ahvPaz +MmGuYbnDrpoE2osjAXsv6HQyeLQRKuIM5//oOxQbeH++2+vxEvW2pRjk3I0HgB6BUIv sLbNRqSv16rvysSCuWvjqS7oFxZcypa/IIbx3b6uUjsEFSiUOQnrYjxfH5M6PkLi1QJZ d7QSXvI6o4oVeUCbL9UamBX2MXa7/vo9R4AWqChAs8FPSihxe5hgHMsGEVn+XhtFGoZg oD5A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=cyLO6sWo1Hb3nZ1NxugwQEJhcOCMyVJg6fuYJ3CIgus=; b=n55YNwz9cfUBCTOq6wpmWi6ZQfXzav5I8/9T8csZ4sUR4rKgu+YQuaeB+uoZzIx8N3 h0l+acvGDzGraASMZVC1bbPIUA2HPBBrYhfUI2W2Gx4TvGH43ky4M5Wj0eDcaaEEsGyk dIYvAuc8Gki/YQx3W+IYNHsELK84jaDMvr+o0SDfTkO9IcGRKSB829JliOJ2FtoQJcL4 NczsTE1xlk+7Ir/qDUlaCsRtlHVBa6GQKs4q6Y4xnkptTDCDOncRLrgWxZiGNLLqtG1E c7Y0QBvR6GSvumAlh4uKfv2zRIH8OZxthghEmbACoi45cHpP53SoibcNjc3hC4MOEDAZ u9cg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAW/AI91hWVvnrtK/sxsV39sW4TqQR3mlKIOWeeAchlMMzAQUvU0 VEkalALiTilXBe3W4KlZqA7VH4Cqf3VBHRx9790=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxesVf/emeNH/xbIp188w8qcSlpWcpiM5XklgC5AOPKnDfA7uJMkvxvX1hV1YJzeMawiQnKBISRVqn+JgzWKhA=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:7d0c:: with SMTP id y12mr3861773ljc.39.1576105807813; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:10:07 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <080BEA58-D52B-4552-A11C-03D5BFCDFAE3@mnot.net> <CACpbDcfYExjOEsTcHs01tLKp5Stk8mhx2to53dv4oqedhF+o7g@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ_4DfSQ3eo4g8785t+qi=6Yrv1kVafuJT4-Y-+Dafgi42rA8w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJ_4DfSQ3eo4g8785t+qi=6Yrv1kVafuJT4-Y-+Dafgi42rA8w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:09:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CACpbDcdD0FgBRH+uqQjKn4K5Best7HWvZa3uu8cAL-zcopa=+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Call for Adoption: draft-schinazi-quic-version-negotiation
To: Ryan Hamilton <rch@google.com>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000cda02d059975bac3"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/-y_2PGoVkKjOvK0mjxDHTqQbQqU>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:10:11 -0000

>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 1:50 PM Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Not having a mechanism means that any work on a next version (even local
>> experiments) is effectively stymied,
>>
>
> Eh? That's a bit overbroad isn't it? If you want to locally experiment
> with a non-standardized QUIC v2, surely you can experiment with
> a non-standardized VN mechanism, right? Or you can even do no VN at all if
> your local clients can learn out of band (alt-svc) that your local server
> supports your new v2.
>

Yeah, fair point about local experiments. I'll take that back.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email