Re: Implicitly opened streams and exposing stream IDs

[Dmitri Tikhonov <[e-mail]>]

I feel I am in some sort of discussion hole -- where was it first
discussed to get rid of relying on Stream IDs in the application
layer?  I'd like to get some background.

  -Dmitri.

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 01:48:10PM -0400, Dmitri Tikhonov wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 11:43:23AM +0000, Marten Seemann wrote:
> > In this case, after accepting a stream, we first have to check the stream
> > ID, since there's no guarantee if the control stream will actually be
> > received first.
> > 
> > For this stream mapping, it seems like the removal of implicitly opened
> > streams implies that QUIC has to expose stream IDs to the application
> > layer.
> 
> I don't see a problem with that -- HTTP is the application layer, and
> the draft specifies that streams 2 and 3 are the control streams.
> 
> > I'm not sure if this was intended when making the change, especially
> > since we're considering to change HQ such that it doesn't rely on QUIC
> > stream IDs any more.
> 
> Are you referring to a specific pull request or an issue on GitHub?
> (I must have missed it.)
> 
>   - Dmitri.