IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: QUIC v2 and Version Negotiation Needs Your Deployment Feedback

Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> Fri, 02 December 2022 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <mt@lowentropy.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23BF8C14CE58 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:23:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lowentropy.net header.b=P87JOf0/; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=hKwl0uW0
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i-LDcenmsrBN for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout2-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.25]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 824ECC14F74F for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 17:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AED320093B for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:23:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from imap41 ([10.202.2.91]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Dec 2022 20:23:22 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lowentropy.net; h=cc:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1669944202; x=1670030602; bh=OV7XJzZfvs 9CG+ObAi6id9ULCtlIJHPw+Ewg95q2qg0=; b=P87JOf0/L0WUXTZN52nt9gJpmw uWVS7YSYhMtdUIQbTnJy+alIMDt3UTwavp5JqcDjQoDxQgCwUkThy2yE2Raf8pcH ETy7cs/w1uPdOBzXm50GU/ahRga/TdZzmcBDK0v3LqTyeN6dyJ0H0+bapY9qrgLK XWdiYgqm+88P5v3Wk3mBZD3YQ/DmL6FxUBRLm9QX0Wj9XxtsiuO5cEY06aSwqbTE PdGlB7s4frpvVHvl34Q8M7Rv5DblNxYlGYgCg0bIy2hLIxLCOHOb/w1qIp38acqa R3tqfYwAB+Mf287UqNAHYBFFFhjXNVwuy0ud5P5VFNOqMNRlmjRQyab0ZS2g==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1669944202; x=1670030602; bh=OV7XJzZfvs9CG+ObAi6id9ULCtlI JHPw+Ewg95q2qg0=; b=hKwl0uW0DG0UjINRy+F8X+N22egW1B4H3DLOzgmOyUZO 5KkvWvYUgdn48qCmO+HZS2j9FEHqGubfqfKccChtyd9cOdW6aieTquwf2Ro1VTRd tGET2ZLPbMzRqnuhh5hm+kToq9pO2/65WrL9h3Gj+YLsXYD+DdeFU+32RJ/7P5Du JUcL4DGa40jYN7FIGsFuQOCkniDatYfVE1E42vzZgbPs1aKW0gjoWSQS1NhQkFCF KPNzJMvuOPkNkiHlrZh39aWcvtrSTJcbUaWnX4920gknK0i8R1sX4GY5e3rCRRjw Pq1OYpzPq93d4kOaks2Oc2ic6p6B0zCku1ae7I45KQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:ilOJYxjQo58pPGpEXTqiZJ3RdiTYHqfz9Jjz2JlY_dIZAkFOTDbrMA> <xme:ilOJY2BGyxN7OGB-eaCKZVxEYRd47arulzQVpjedH1frHaETDtlf19ruXjKVUMlfU -NmuTB4BDHSknLlMzU>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvhedrtdeigdefhecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgesthdtre dtreertdenucfhrhhomhepfdforghrthhinhcuvfhhohhmshhonhdfuceomhhtsehlohif vghnthhrohhphidrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeetueeikedtkeelfeekve fhkeffvedvvefgkefgleeugfdvjeejgeffieegtdejnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgep tdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhtsehlohifvghnthhrohhphidrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:ilOJYxGPpybAtaU0YNJVTzIfYC78IwyIM3yB4GQmV538rHNE5Xr4HA> <xmx:ilOJY2SccOaAgdIL5ZNozvT_-nj_enyg3nsvqEzyGofvEu08oUEfmg> <xmx:ilOJY-wy6GpL-2TpN1vbxp89WnY7OMOZwnnKwUlocxUZF0algBpTZg> <xmx:ilOJY98lJdpHQI4a08UyV1cY_BQ3qIihgx7Y8JzpO7kQCfrdN8C4yg>
Feedback-ID: ic129442d:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id ECABC234007B; Thu, 1 Dec 2022 20:23:21 -0500 (EST)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.7.0-alpha0-1115-g8b801eadce-fm-20221102.001-g8b801ead
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <1f1f6075-c1df-4529-8028-647b37a47265@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxQuzW6GA4WK0s=ieh_7Krsdj1G12K=stepJBUQ4M34tjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADdTf+hGE5LGviD7py+3j8SDLUZY9dA=OUkiLQ=DrgcnVK815A@mail.gmail.com> <CAM4esxQuzW6GA4WK0s=ieh_7Krsdj1G12K=stepJBUQ4M34tjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 09:22:56 +0800
From: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: QUIC v2 and Version Negotiation Needs Your Deployment Feedback
Content-Type: text/plain
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/0BeW2yHAfkJ_FwU7GiEhImLT4oo>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 01:23:28 -0000

On Fri, Dec 2, 2022, at 03:41, Martin Duke wrote:
> Relatedly, if I roll a new QUIC version field, should I also rev the 
> salt, retry key, and so on?

I'd say that is up to you.  Though some people are concerned about crashes, it's another opportunity to break ossification.  I give neither position any particular weight.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email