Re: Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions"

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Wed, 09 December 2020 16:19 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDACA3A0EA5 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:19:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.848
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.848 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ydJBXHQIQGW for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71F7A3A0EAE for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 08:19:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb2a.google.com with SMTP id o144so1311668ybc.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 08:19:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=IdY+QKgCqWqbypZAZranAuse6NxePOxy0ZrmLS5/2gI=; b=UcXuu3cmEGW4f1tdEyWSsISu1V/OBSWWiAhPRmEpYSlHVbDWoNUdH8IlGjTJVzIp1x hOrYMH2GjzwPd1MhFWN9/j/dwENkuPDFtiO7h5l/wT61pwXzQI8OteNvrdBkiLM0MZ+f x02KxVJRvNSMX5zcR+VTbFzocFbs/or0kV9Jt6MKdHaedwskhG0gS1cnzRqn+5T297Sn in0mHdLfnBSHGD4Ol/ZVku1o+sRiVrQLO7mP0RU0HKBHBSCYLbC0gyXYass5UB2jwlSy 9pFhqwrQVggHtv0qjpYRObKevV9sb+f/BotWfDgu/00A/iQMCVJODSLvsh15Cidx1UFf ZsVw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IdY+QKgCqWqbypZAZranAuse6NxePOxy0ZrmLS5/2gI=; b=D9zjXiGtjLAiEOzlaFAvPCmMQv8JiF4q0K3TaTZAX0ke4jVfk0SxSsZkhmT7W0S3NU rG8QfWTlxzwDCYfr0Q99HtJXNlzGOImG/rsLx7YJzsRuzxwguzYBDE1KTLPiB9FJZxym 40YwUNySbvLQ/LDE1s2hhXY4ClIRdNETGsZmwYIOsJQiMZOve0RMOeX947/lEMIkQ9yK U2/9Q6fsSat2KXtQJDoVartJPmS01g+a3RuBd9V7Yb30M7/CwdwkLI5G29THaU6hUljQ Dqj2igFcGh/EhaRWdRiWGoy6OzpkWHnNdfBaIyAT9T7SYRxqprop0tWXZR2ZP3lX1Kzi TsWg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339n9wNE4RC5YAHVwFFRPFz9j8mTS1uk7GBIQf3izQTWxrdHLeT IkzeWUwBYa6YcVar8Ujm6mh5TNYuBo36KNhTECFxAuCGhv8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3X5MoZ8zCSaRHnb6xfG8edRxgL53h8S6Gl9eM6hiS6iFUpzRApoHkybXQIeXzPlV5Ua4maB19uMDO0fJZCrQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:8608:: with SMTP id y8mr4692204ybk.324.1607530797719; Wed, 09 Dec 2020 08:19:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160675082221.16479.6130039061469494989@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAOYVs2ogM86kasog5T7-XG3Nx3kZGx6Vi1id=O=0yK6WK3LHOg@mail.gmail.com> <7047_1606815783_5FC61027_7047_384_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E3A64B1F1@OPEXCAUBM41.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CANatvzwjyfrzoX6vA4S81hABQXcpYCJ7DWEDYBnNnRLFGWMgXg@mail.gmail.com> <LEJPR01MB0635396C6C147F869AFDCD14FAF40@LEJPR01MB0635.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <1927_1606850062_5FC6960E_1927_422_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E3A64C3E8@OPEXCAUBM41.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <CACpbDceeYDNV7mDcj1x4w21UE3nJggoxp0vNTd8M-yn3ShhYDg@mail.gmail.com> <BYAPR02MB5176090F48871DD8E9FB9904F7F20@BYAPR02MB5176.namprd02.prod.outlook.com> <LEJPR01MB0635AA0C1EF193B23922FFDFFAF20@LEJPR01MB0635.DEUPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.DE> <CACpbDccetebMK26uxGVVkn2HpONDoyTYSp0s=BApRN-FOr1SmQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAcdMu0Dd89X7dFrbaLjs8+QQ8nnkdTgxKuhacBBw7e7SpQ@mail.gmail.com> <5F4378EC-A74A-4445-80CF-DE00F5F847DE@eggert.org> <CAC8QAcdwGyCym=xD-P-ds+B8vBsEgG_R3Eqz-BxujBp9vgjEJQ@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oaC-ygW7SUz3=DoPNY8gzTYovBRHNmKh1m311tJNSQp_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oaC-ygW7SUz3=DoPNY8gzTYovBRHNmKh1m311tJNSQp_A@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 10:19:46 -0600
Message-ID: <CAC8QAce36OUD3vGH5eqZ3g8zC-157mcuJrLM4BbQKx8Us_=EwA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Draft response to New Liaison Statement, "LS on ATSSS Phase 2 conclusions"
To: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000029e26b05b60a6e44"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/0NnGIwyVKytbpswyqxxAvzm8F2I>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:20:00 -0000

Well, I wrote my personal views on the proposed reply.
Was expecting mpquic enthusiasts to speak up, it seems so far no one else
did.

Behcet

On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 3:25 PM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Behcet,
>
> On Tue, 8 Dec 2020, 21:07 Behcet Sarikaya, <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Lars,
>>
>> Sorry I did not understand this email and found it very negative.
>>
>> You mention individual proposals, I saw 4 listed somewhere before.
>> However, the one by Huitema is not a solution perse (no offense intended)
>> it addresses one issue it is based on his view that multiple paths should
>> have one packet numbering.
>> I thought that deconinck draft was the main one which already has been
>> revised so many times.
>>
>
> The propose liason statement is based on our understanding of the WG
> following the multipath-focused interim meeting and subsequent discussion.
> This highlighted different use-cases for multipath and different possible
> technical designs. For example, we were presented with Alibaba's use case
> which decided not to use the design in draft-deconninck.
>
> That there is more than one possible design, and that there is active
> discussion about philosophical design details, is a signal that the WG is
> still forming consensus. And we should provide the time needed to explore
> these aspects further.
>
>
>> Also I am not sure if it is a good idea to be not so cooperative with a
>> very important organization like 3GPP.
>>
>
> Consesus is participant driven, we encourage folks to participate in the
> QUIC WG and continue the discussion, in line with the guidance Lars
> previously sent out.
>
>
>
>> So I suggest a deep rewrite of this reply.
>>
>
> We welcome specific suggestions from you or other WG members.
>
> Kind regards
> Lucas
>