Re: [Wish] [AVTCORE] Video ingest over QUIC

Nils Ohlmeier <nils.ohlmeier@8x8.com> Thu, 15 July 2021 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <nils.ohlmeier@8x8.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C683A12BA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:10:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=8x8.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8iDy3Zy8NjyC for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x430.google.com (mail-pf1-x430.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::430]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5878E3A12B8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x430.google.com with SMTP id 17so6569312pfz.4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=8x8.com; s=googlemail; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=cY0SGrHwZXii8EcZsIVOMoFiGoLGI1kjyX9D/D0o+AU=; b=AWyrZ/vbU7xnxkJiKjgqyUbmq3dSo2SDpP5dEA8UjhrTzip9FnQNE4FyYbXlDGmDE6 140q5HNEzloVXxTATcLpG6JwGcGng0jiNoTrcVdwu6/LFnkWXjldlChqA9Ax+TrRh4sw h4bj8BZjRo0SwGocr1Cgk7/Le35qO7el/m5MA=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=cY0SGrHwZXii8EcZsIVOMoFiGoLGI1kjyX9D/D0o+AU=; b=Li2GG3ZcnY1gXtx6Rs9B5tWqYAgfKyjFzSIgUjJTcvngZDkKs4orfJKtvw/YHm/lat wnmZ07pK4eFNrSmXLkFYENWXS3+UnIv8hgKxw+KX8RkUSwnIB6ag7S+5QbXFY1cQYPxQ gocj2Art5lhiF5698CuxkeMX6TOVOS38bDFEr50vKjW3M+ZLdjRGE/uAp0wsZood+kLS 8oEPfXWmuF929qsmnzSRosYVo3vFtpFdICkmkR6RWXnc7S4fSJaKmavLzGxHotSkM1La DbGTLpwUSgjA08VCjfvCw6DqiJzSNQTlwijCZOxhCIh5jfR7OL7oOBROsqp6u083o/7t Ay7g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530ZQhKu7ZxfA/fTI/V2AxdrEKAHnBQoLlBi85XxC68sIOI4kpub ArXl6ZcBeMUim0+OEBkbJygNRw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJya7uhvkoo+wJeN2MQL6tBChlLrdQjtQ9GCianKUkNKVz9L6N5lGqmWB5YZtC+9yj2JH9QjyA==
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:1307:b029:308:1e2b:a24b with SMTP id j7-20020a056a001307b02903081e2ba24bmr6373581pfu.57.1626379835159; Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:10:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:647:4600:3f31:6c2a:797f:2799:9523]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm6053563pjv.57.2021.07.15.13.10.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
From: Nils Ohlmeier <nils.ohlmeier@8x8.com>
Message-Id: <217D311C-35EE-4AD2-882C-30D337CB4B0F@8x8.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_92AC468C-F968-4517-8E70-500C2AA266AE"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\))
Subject: Re: [Wish] [AVTCORE] Video ingest over QUIC
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 13:10:33 -0700
In-Reply-To: <CA+ag07YWXPGMoMd7Qfhc5Y1bKPmq3EWEijyMMYHRZKSr4NGU5w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: "quic@ietf.org" <quic@ietf.org>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>, "wish@ietf.org" <wish@ietf.org>
To: Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com>
References: <YQXPR0101MB090336C0926E15E86F5BC3F9B2129@YQXPR0101MB0903.CANPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CA+ag07YWXPGMoMd7Qfhc5Y1bKPmq3EWEijyMMYHRZKSr4NGU5w@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/0wjZle2Kfc4xtIsQloeKqYhrSoo>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 14:23:09 -0700
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2021 20:10:42 -0000

Yes I think DISPATCH would be right avenue for exploring this further.

Best
  Nils Ohlmeier

> On Jul 15, 2021, at 10:53, Sergio Garcia Murillo <sergio.garcia.murillo@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Wouldn't it be best to present the draft at the next DISPATCH meeting to create a WG/mailing list/etc? 
> 
> Best regards
> Sergio
> 
> El jue, 15 jul 2021 a las 19:29, Maxim Sharabayko (<maxsharabayko@haivision.com <mailto:maxsharabayko@haivision.com>>) escribió:
> @Alan, cool draft, thanks for sharing!
> 
>  
> 
> @here
> 
> It would be extremely interesting to see a dedicated mailing list and a working group established to discuss options for live contribution over QUIC.
> 
>  
> 
> We at Haivision have started evaluating QUIC Datagrams as an underlying transport for the Secure Reliable Transport (SRT) protocol [1].
> 
> In such a combination QUIC provides a network transport known to CDNs and ISPs, allowing to route and load balance the traffic, while SRT is used for latency-aware live streaming at sub-second latencies and loss recovery based on ARQ and/or FEC.
> 
> An RFC draft preview "Tunneling SRT over QUIC" is available here [2].
> 
>  
> 
> We've also done a PoC using the quicly [3] library to assess the approach and check for technical difficulties like possible conflicts between SRT's and QUIC's CC. The results are exciting!
> 
>  
> 
> We would be happy to present our work to the IETF community.
> 
>  
> 
> [1] - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sharabayko-srt-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-sharabayko-srt-00>
> [2] - https://haivision.github.io/srt-rfc/draft-sharabayko-srt-over-quic.html <https://haivision.github.io/srt-rfc/draft-sharabayko-srt-over-quic.html>
> [3] - https://github.com/h2o/quicly <https://github.com/h2o/quicly>
>  
> 
> -- Maxim
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: QUIC <quic-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:quic-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Mike English <ietf@englishm.net <mailto:ietf@englishm.net>>
> Sent: 14 July 2021 19:09
> To: Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:vasilvv=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>
> Cc: Roberto Peon <fenix=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:fenix=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>; avt@ietf.org <mailto:avt@ietf.org> <avt@ietf.org <mailto:avt@ietf.org>>; wish@ietf.org <mailto:wish@ietf.org> <wish@ietf.org <mailto:wish@ietf.org>>; juberti@alphaexplorationco.com <mailto:juberti@alphaexplorationco.com> <juberti@alphaexplorationco.com <mailto:juberti@alphaexplorationco.com>>; Alan Frindell <afrind=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org <mailto:afrind=40fb.com@dmarc.ietf.org>>; quic@ietf.org <mailto:quic@ietf.org> <quic@ietf.org <mailto:quic@ietf.org>>; Kirill Pugin <ikir@fb.com <mailto:ikir@fb.com>>; Luke Curley <kixelated@gmail.com <mailto:kixelated@gmail.com>>
> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [Wish] [AVTCORE] Video ingest over QUIC
> 
>  
> 
> I would personally be very interested in a "video over QUIC" working group or mailing list.
> 
> The directness of this draft is perhaps what's most interesting to me. 
> In particular, the absence of out-of-band signaling / session establishment stands in striking contrast with another UDP-based media ingest option: WebRTC.
> 
> The signaling needed for session establishment (and the diversity of implementations for such signaling) has historically been a barrier for WebRTC adoption as an ingest protocol outside of the browser context. WISH-WG is working to improve that situation for WebRTC of course, but a new QUIC-based ingest protocol presents an opportunity to sidestep some of those known-issues by making an architectural decision up front about whether that style of session management is necessary in a video contribution workflow.
> 
> I'm hoping others with more experience on these lists can speak to the history and tradeoffs associated with those approaches, but I just wanted to call attention to the aspect of the draft that seemed most notable to me as an operator of a low latency streaming platform where WebRTC egress and ingest capabilities are provided, but where RTMP is still the de facto ingest protocol of choice for many users.
> 
> Thanks for sharing this work!
> -Mike
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Maxim Sharabayko 
> Senior Software Developer                                                 
> <logo-h.png> <https://www.haivision.com/>	
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Wish mailing list
> Wish@ietf.org <mailto:Wish@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish>
> -- 
> Wish mailing list
> Wish@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wish