Re: 2 Points of First Implementation Draft we might clarify

Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com> Wed, 28 June 2017 21:13 UTC

Return-Path: <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A20112EA6A for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:13:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM=0.5, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LQCGXF8O0iyG for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linode64.ducksong.com (www.ducksong.com [192.155.95.102]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07BFB12EC58 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:13:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-f169.google.com (mail-qt0-f169.google.com [209.85.216.169]) by linode64.ducksong.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A601A3A0A0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:13:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-f169.google.com with SMTP id f92so60062911qtb.2 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: AKS2vOxktxIj3/4yZ/3nfC/aZcO2iNAOBH4VFXqC7nh1LxW2mW/efL+V U/k7JvIP9tgjxjHdXRg/eziyP3AppA==
X-Received: by 10.237.61.153 with SMTP id i25mr16029877qtf.239.1498684416470; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:13:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.12.183.85 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:13:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnUD3tRdci95TgGqg4xPZeV=knCug=EoNw-S+3oatx_G8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAOdDvNreiyrk1bpGc5Cu0OXyO1KDGk25USYM7jz5GpXQCdUpfQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gMat+zRrBG1WxiE0O7owDqksR8-JAujPxPOT89p3TgtQw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKcm_gNALLfD7fbpLs=bjFP9oOpx_efJndNtsKT21S5ADDYn1w@mail.gmail.com> <CABkgnnUD3tRdci95TgGqg4xPZeV=knCug=EoNw-S+3oatx_G8Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:13:35 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrH6NuFXa0P_kXsOM7+KhyP=pabN2y9nbCPdURgv2Ud1g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAOdDvNrH6NuFXa0P_kXsOM7+KhyP=pabN2y9nbCPdURgv2Ud1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 2 Points of First Implementation Draft we might clarify
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, Patrick McManus <pmcmanus@mozilla.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113b859a46347105530ba841"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/0xWqnvBfihQ5GSh9Y4R0pKVp3F8>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 21:13:39 -0000

and now we see the reason we have a problem :)

On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 2:12 PM, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 28 June 2017 at 14:10, Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com> wrote:
> > Would only supporting 18 cause problems for anyone?
>
>
> Anyone using OpenSSL would have a real hard time.
>