IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 8999?

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Wed, 05 May 2021 15:21 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA603A11E3 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 May 2021 08:21:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.92
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.92 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tlch7RGqLxze for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 May 2021 08:21:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA7683A11E0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 May 2021 08:21:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.118] (p548dcb12.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.203.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gabriel-vm-2.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Fb0mM2c02zykf; Wed, 5 May 2021 17:21:23 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.6\))
Subject: Re: 8999?
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <CACpbDcdCw+-gT1N9qJsxwLqn+Pt+3H+u8JdCnPWYF8Uy8OLkFA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:21:22 +0200
Cc: quic@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 641920882.908329-c24b5ebfe433744df88debcb9bbb576c
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <214742DA-FE00-4250-9FF2-48D692161AFA@tzi.org>
References: <e692ad5c-5a1f-106a-a586-3c2573defdab@huitema.net> <56152de9-efb9-f8b0-bba4-b566bc8ef69a@huitema.net> <0fd7e332-67ec-4467-8887-92870cc01f75@www.fastmail.com> <CACpbDcdCw+-gT1N9qJsxwLqn+Pt+3H+u8JdCnPWYF8Uy8OLkFA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.6)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/347V2nywHK6JLp6C3PeKONIeJ0w>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 15:21:32 -0000

On 2021-05-05, at 15:21, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> And clearly, that we were completely coincidentally assigned 9000 is a sign that the gods are putting their power behind this.

Yeah, the number 9000 is a portent of quality in other SDOs (e.g., ISO!) :-)

SCNR.

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email