Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 20 December 2020 07:40 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E9A3A0B91 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 23:40:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=LZ5xPpzh; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=IPdUxr2e
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nXZ3LwxL5HhJ for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 23:40:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39C483A0B8F for <quic@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Dec 2020 23:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 047105C0067 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:40:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:40:28 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=Vlsi8RtTCvlduGRNeFdH07rQJYGZY5s03KSSzf0LZg8=; b=LZ5xPpzh SLEeCjT1KdJylx43FG4k/vXYNeWGa8Q84sUTWliki3Uj2ESRd8Z8xniopIwO0uCg ncWrratGnNxPwaYhHU5uz2d3HbPaTSfWZEHU1pzrTEXK6Bcv5hmknLbu2a/4Lbgp scMsugrjy10r4Oe/3b1fhUTrbmJnIqvV4HI8lBUOh74CgIj4xshT6FSXxFJzHoWm ulUk7s5CegIzhXCoXX7jGbvHNXt29JN5dNxBuvIHGmCm5m9OW3X4yJJT12fav2Z7 VwSMV9bVqwThKdCVKmeAoSuFuOniq8TLA5nbBGgi29xwhPGV4z0FP3xReGrTEDn/ 1x3SaiFKYOANwQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Vlsi8RtTCvlduGRNeFdH07rQJYGZY 5s03KSSzf0LZg8=; b=IPdUxr2edKVEo48CRodoOaLTWHPzdMOMrV0ZgQ5WBsKrq f6DYBGGBcDvmTODxY1GcsRO9QXG5BfEPPoeDLmRHekL/Mck4VHeBNpA8OO9UN5Rk U4iaq3bhbCSmKrEN7SZmwIQIR9NwMPqyBxUuNARrRjG2WuwzwtK094ULNUqsNl7d eHQwhcAGuaNLR8BL+EgoQUxvNIzPZsi7Xj401cR1T/MrX4TlYPzt+Nu/KPQVupsJ UyO/2c/IBi4M+uITzTLhucOS/fiHqTxJdS0PGmx2uWxsJcOGaJBo01tvza5dIuQf CaVBgB7zk3ObTe805r8emfgErj+U18OP8QJoJ4xXQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:6__eX0_c9w18JoXNhUUMPn4BEkrcZCdIaTTsS4zGFZbIHfJpbKQrsQ> <xme:6__eX8vjQYW6J44YtZQ5oGD7Y2s4diOJ5go9jVtz-w0HIS5Vxp0q-PE89sASUPpus WdZaYwYS8ACm01VUQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudelledgudduudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeegtddrjedtrdejuddrud dtleenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:6__eX6C3OvCjiJxZ6ctZdDt8Ey9AA23NkBOafbRIZMv1Q-UMEr3IlA> <xmx:6__eX0dbXVYfSPhVb3dhlEuUKkOQYAnpxsTs3Q-1hDHQ2ZWaZ2idCw> <xmx:6__eX5NreZm6zg5nk45I3dHDW--P6-Bbgqk9UMuFB1CSrQCzG2A9KQ> <xmx:7P_eX33oU4N1BuOk9R4iR0O6qV-OwdQ8az4FqQjBNES-tFf8Tl1NFw>
Received: from fv-az59-708.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [40.70.71.109]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4ED501080057 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:40:27 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============5369001000230101294=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20201220074027.4ED501080057@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 02:40:27 -0500
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/3CPpWXyEXBQTRxWkT3GePksTqaI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 07:40:32 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+1/-3/💬2)
  1 issues created:
  - Acknowledgement or acknowledgment, not both (by mikkelfj)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4440 

  2 issues received 2 new comments:
  - #4378 IANA review of -transport; question 3 (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4336 Error code for illegal field composition (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4336 [-http] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 

  3 issues closed:
  - Error code for illegal field composition https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4336 [-http] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - IANA review of -tls https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4369 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] 
  - IANA review of -transport; question 3 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-0/💬17)
  6 issues received 17 new comments:
  - #152 In prose, it is "connection ID" (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/152 
  - #151 Connection ID linkability is missing a premise (3 by martinthomson, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/151 
  - #147 DDoS guidance is inaccurate about QUIC-LB (4 by martinduke, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/147 
  - #145 Ask people not to drop new versions? (3 by martinduke, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/145 
  - #144 Does the length self-encoding scheme actually work? (3 by martinduke, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/144 
  - #142 Integrity Protection is not quite right (3 by martinduke, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/142 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+4/-1/💬8)
  4 issues created:
  - Rules for Resumption Tokens (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/68 
  - Packet Number in Retry Token (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/67 
  - Security Considerations for Shared-State Retry Keys (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/66 
  - Cryptographic agility (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/65 

  1 issues received 8 new comments:
  - #66 Security Considerations for Shared-State Retry Keys (8 by huitema, martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/66 

  1 issues closed:
  - Using ECB for retry tokens seems sub optimal https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/35 

* quicwg/version-negotiation (+1/-1/💬3)
  1 issues created:
  - Editor's Copy link is broken (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/9 

  3 issues received 3 new comments:
  - #9 Editor's Copy link is broken (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/9 
  - #8 Client Offer Version-Specific Transport Parameters (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/8 
  - #6 Should "Compatible Version" mention 0-RTT? (1 by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/6 

  1 issues closed:
  - Editor's Copy link is broken https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/issues/9 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+8/-6/💬0)
  8 pull requests submitted:
  - Fix transport I-D typo: s/amplication/amplification/ (by dtikhonov)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4448 
  - Add a few missing transport-33 changelog items (by dtikhonov)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4447 
  - replace remaining use of "octet" with "byte" (by kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4446 
  - qpack-20 changelog (by afrind)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4444 
  - http: update terminology and ref for new http core drafts (by reschke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4442 
  - qpack: update section refs for new HTTP core drafts (by reschke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4441 
  - Recovery changelog (by janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4438 
  - Consistency tweak to persistent congestion definition (by janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4437 

  6 pull requests merged:
  - Fix transport I-D typo: s/amplication/amplification/
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4448 
  - http: update terminology and ref for new http core drafts
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4442 
  - qpack: update section refs for new HTTP core drafts
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4441 
  - Malformed could get its own error
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4346 [-http] [design] 
  - Final salt and retry keys
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4431 [-tls] [design] 
  - Consistency tweak to persistent congestion definition
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4437 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-0/💬1)
  1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
  - #150 Editorial Pass on quic-manageability (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/150 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+0/-2/💬3)
  1 pull requests received 3 new comments:
  - #59 Aead retry token (3 by huitema, martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/59 

  2 pull requests merged:
  - Aead retry token
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/59 
  - Paragraph on SNI routing
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/63 

* quicwg/version-negotiation (+1/-1/💬0)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - fix link to editors copy (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/10 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - fix link to editors copy
    https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation/pull/10 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation