Re: transport-05 stream blocked

Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> Thu, 07 September 2017 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <jri@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67572132F6C for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id og3XgdmyLtMe for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8AD6132F6D for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id s62so3088977ywg.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=y9RrfuXBQMua2EkYgKv7/69fqM0FxYbDaMPT+jun+j8=; b=gAklHQXX2dmp0ISouTDaenUoM9Thn1aI7b84HU7IiIdJLquGk2RxeN2KQp6pmGyN0b YkmpYItpmyLzSVydcyNKazPM4XJmJuMFV1xNlpnx6E8SpfxJ5zn4oqG0DaLvgkjeddhY 0/7Xik3LFyBFJnL/MQlS1UFj1b83fZWFFj4nKuFUrSAQPNaIpgrNiOEz4sO5CikY5Xml wIYJx7CKYHGQvJvxL5RZPavpGVloDYEo37s6bVAXrtFebla8ox1LdQ+llpTE6rtU3cw1 ukIvzTcH1NlkFHPjx6ZE6TZwmD9Y7UsWE3tEFb0aVY4RtXCL5kEAeS0+FKhDJtE3FIXY OAFg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=y9RrfuXBQMua2EkYgKv7/69fqM0FxYbDaMPT+jun+j8=; b=pAoRqsFkxuf0lTOZc/sljMx2CaWBluN90bX8M1vKYuX9cRHElzPS5YvxYbTDWS7DHa ZvrGEHFEgoe1jyPnodV1Z2qerBNsGGSCfNHUSirOhUU5iV+QK9LOwqDuiRNKmHDFmDKE JmW3sXTGrHiZcEnfcpNwxfo6q4KmTTe7j0wn1WkReTrjOGOc8NBi8zpMW30sD1N4jSUZ hB5yjj0PxrwjXhXHikxs9X9uYmgzwyOYFvQeRTUti/PBvGfqy5OOg0KQ3q9+37m6tx+h kv5CuFF4rvBXKToZYnmIGsqp+6ShPREZfPTq8V24pStG1qXk5I0wflYxTV9KVp6n4i2j NQMw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUiydSBmqhbdCf3N1PbM30dAVGf8/qrvQCbvxFjIf9KdZToxlCvq Os19ewD40mqtYxEtsnWv2e9AQUkyDee7JdE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb4jYmkEe9uHkOdVhGLHVq50mHhu+tjPqXUUWi+19vzQGqh635WCUtAhAZbzUNkk1ovRuaU+w3y4AkT4mTXgJWY=
X-Received: by 10.37.171.202 with SMTP id v68mr799455ybi.258.1504823351723; Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.118.133 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 15:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD801A86@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD801A86@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 15:29:10 -0700
Message-ID: <CAGD1bZbE5iCQaEz8KpDSN9fVHvMResS=FH4FoUuv=RV0o8+Ahg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: transport-05 stream blocked
To: Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11e67b3454ee2c0558a0fd29"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/51bk9Qg41pOEpUR65zSa22sKOgE>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 22:29:16 -0000

Thanks for the catch, Roni. I'll fix this.

On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 11:12 PM, Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> The following text is in 8.9 but should be in 8.10 describing
> STREAM_ID_NEEDED
>
>  “An endpoint MAY send a STREAM_BLOCKED frame for a stream that exceeds
>
>    the maximum stream ID set by its peer (see Section 8.6).  This does
>
>    not open the stream, but informs the peer that a new stream was
>
>    needed, but the stream limit prevented the creation of the stream.”
>
>
>
> Roni
>