Re: Consensus Call on #2344: Frames that are allowed in 0-RTT packets

["Martin Thomson" <[e-mail]>]

I responded to the suggestion (it got lost in the noise).  If you have specific suggestions about what text might be removed, that would be great.

On Wed, Mar 6, 2019, at 16:39, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen wrote:
>  
> There is a pending suggested change on TLS impact on state. I’m fine 
> with a negative list in 0-RTT, but would prefer a positive list, 
> possibly in a table. I think the discussion on replay could be trimmed 
> a bit.
> 
> *Fra:* QUIC <[e-mail]> på vegne af Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>
> *Sendt:* onsdag, marts 6, 2019 4:51 AM
> *Til:* IETF QUIC WG
> *Cc:* Lars Eggert
> *Emne:* Consensus Call on #2344: Frames that are allowed in 0-RTT packets 
>  Regarding: 
>  <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2344> 
> 
>  We discussed this in Tokyo, and then continued discussion on-list. The 
> editors now believe that this PR resolves the issue: 
>  <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2355> 
> 
>  ...... and discussion so far seems to support consensus to do so. If 
> you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message; 
> absent any pushback, we'll declare consensus at the end of the week. 
> 
>  Regards, 
> 
>  -- 
>  Mark and Lars, WG Chairs 
>