Re: [IETF106] Proposed workshop on QUIC performance over high BDP

Joerg Ott <ott@in.tum.de> Tue, 05 November 2019 09:38 UTC

Return-Path: <ott@in.tum.de>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F1B120863; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 01:38:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g4atOR24TqXV; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 01:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-out1.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mail-out1.in.tum.de [131.159.0.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F7631201E5; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 01:38:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix, from userid 107) id B695D1C0405; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 10:38:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: (Authenticated sender: ott) by mail.in.tum.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41EF61C0403; Tue, 5 Nov 2019 10:38:08 +0100 (CET) (Extended-Queue-bit tech_mewyo@fff.in.tum.de)
Subject: Re: [IETF106] Proposed workshop on QUIC performance over high BDP
To: Kuhn Nicolas <Nicolas.Kuhn@cnes.fr>, "etosat@ietf.org" <etosat@ietf.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, "iccrg@irtf.org" <iccrg@irtf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>, "nwcrg@irtf.org" <nwcrg@irtf.org>, "'ippm@ietf.org'" <ippm@ietf.org>
Cc: "'gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk'" <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>, STEPHAN Emile RD-CORE-LAN <emile.stephan@orange.com>
References: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1ECE4F1F@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
From: Joerg Ott <ott@in.tum.de>
Message-ID: <314f4a3c-9e56-26b6-fda3-bc2694f75d3e@in.tum.de>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2019 10:38:06 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F3B0A07CFD358240926B78A680E166FF1ECE4F1F@TW-MBX-P03.cnesnet.ad.cnes.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/5kh5cWaRYo-CqtPpe8jU0zUO25w>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2019 09:38:17 -0000

Hi guys,

great activity -- we also did extensive emulation studies for QUIC
over satellites in a controlled environment.  Would be happy to
share those findings if room.

Cheers,
Jörg

On 05.11.19 09:57, Kuhn Nicolas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> There are multiple drafts related to the performance of QUIC over large 
> BDP networks (draft-kuhn-quic-4-sat, draft-kuhn-quic-0rtt-bdp, 
> draft-ietf-quic-recovery) or related to the performance of encrypted 
> protocols in general (draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-cc).
> 
> The objective of this workshop is to gather people interested in such 
> activity and discuss the best way towards better end user experience in 
> this use case.
> 
> Details : https://trac.ietf.org/trac/ietf/meeting/wiki/106sidemeetings
> 
> Time : 3pm30 – 4pm30 on Wednesday
> 
> Where : Bras Basah 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/floor-plan?room=bras-basah#raffles-city-convention-center 
> 
> 
> Proposed agenda:
> 
> Introduction : contributions that showed performance issues with QUIC 
> over satellite links
> 
> draft-kuhn-quic-0rtt-bdp : solution to let both client and server know 
> the path characteristics
> 
> draft-kuhn-quic-4-sat : what can be done once both client and server 
> have this information
> 
> draft-fairhurst-tsvwg-cc : generalization to any transport and best 
> current practice on internet congestion control at end points
> 
> If time permits: sharing experimental results (interaction between 
> transport and high BDP systems)
> 
> If there is anything you would like to present please let us know.
> 
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Nico, Gorry and Emile
>