Consensus call for two multipath QUIC issues
Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com> Wed, 05 June 2024 14:47 UTC
Return-Path: <lucas@lucaspardue.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 191FEC15199B; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 07:47:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lucaspardue.com header.b="kXaGi4Cf"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="CTMBqjZ/"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SWJFztPBAk62; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 07:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh7-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.158]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A7C1C1519B4; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 07:47:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfhigh.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964C71140156; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:47:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap53 ([10.202.2.103]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 05 Jun 2024 10:47:36 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lucaspardue.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to; s=fm3; t=1717598856; x=1717685256; bh=Y014zOtPvzyI4CRhaSlaF rpBi2O9PhHsDPxspbGW74U=; b=kXaGi4Cfhj3OLR0YclQcHkkuGEasU4gjjVIXE pPJJwTt5wcNmjxqBmxSful07GJO4M4fog5eEwG85qnSsO9Bju9f7tHOBYchaSQLz 0ucoq0Zm6yTv6ZXpLIOxbF4cIK1XPrWrKz8mMGsNI5nRtxaMuZGa6p084/G4qhbd q10/GPkIvzMChyj/EXt43BGxkDJ3TaIua4u2y0DvB10Xk9pIMSoQT4K4ts9Dmfkv YM7jg4E63WJ5EX8xEzJxCQO+mhCBSSJdXwr27jaSy1Dg5CZjMtyz978da9kx7dXU n3Idm+dqvWuLg5uykeOHuM8xy55x4CZyZdNml0nbgm59Xs2Qg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1717598856; x=1717685256; bh=Y014zOtPvzyI4CRhaSlaFrpBi2O9PhHsDPx spbGW74U=; b=CTMBqjZ/WwNz3aMIJQzGvrens9D9Pc1lsA64isbAQZM7FUCqpqw XCE2Z8eBmSOVDmid7LVJdZ+2IObA/78tXtEXnCA+SbYC+BlYTSm/8zcgx+Qx9kZn JntypzGSsaxqZ3MnSFsPZfqisxc42V1irbidnr8MmZsUhvvBnQN2LQXe/LezWCjz 1i5FzquXlbrpHoAsthSI0lDGTBU7zuhgXB8Q40pIQRdIwNHysRIWeKH+DBh+08p3 RxvCAd9cycRe//BqZO1JtWaGukZgXjWG8OiDcQBjgEPhh2+KIAfjR6J1mIKY03vc 6z9D5qsbNwc/3ytaVDW6HfIk30fYnWBSiPw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:iHpgZmp3yEdl3Ymw1FzL6DAJXdhC7UeABKyhh-bL8eL2ICubCa6eBw> <xme:iHpgZkowUvVz96f7CZ3jpUqJsGAHnrnWjPl3uQ4KyugoBmE59dwAOMoWU6Bk3B_F2 SmFtlLsG-aD6ihvppY>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdeliedgkeduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkfffhvfevufgtsegrtderreerredtnecuhfhrohhmpedfnfhutggr shcurfgrrhguuhgvfdcuoehluhgtrghssehluhgtrghsphgrrhguuhgvrdgtohhmqeenuc ggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekgfejgeegkeeijedvgfegfeekjeehjeejffetudegieeuiefg vdejteefgeeiueenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrh fuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhhutggrsheslhhutggrshhp rghrughuvgdrtghomh
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:iHpgZrNj-fK-pAmxImNfvRFUc4gxbhftljw0ifU6zO4bvRuTZ6KPYA> <xmx:iHpgZl6xqet39brfKZwqwzNI9QWSdGK4I_BdJ_8EjyesTVKup3EFmg> <xmx:iHpgZl69hg-_-SuPy07d_nmhr0kruhUFYli7wl8_osNlOzaAWhLs-A> <xmx:iHpgZlixD0LMuiqlP5QUOZjmtflsJ4sHFsmcnBoJkwtXmC0xBry80Q> <xmx:iHpgZnRK9uXqwNQYyHj7hk806sNSJ410BPz63Nr0gLlE3lWUB3qrCX_6>
Feedback-ID: i23b94938:Fastmail
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 38AA83640070; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 10:47:36 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.11.0-alpha0-497-g97f96844c-fm-20240526.001-g97f96844
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <80f71b32-6e80-4406-b33e-03b54b31a1bb@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 15:47:13 +0100
From: Lucas Pardue <lucas@lucaspardue.com>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Consensus call for two multipath QUIC issues
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="431b9b33776941169929f18e407505c5"
Message-ID-Hash: KY3G2JY5DQQT6PAUZQPC4O5UFA3HNNB4
X-Message-ID-Hash: KY3G2JY5DQQT6PAUZQPC4O5UFA3HNNB4
X-MailFrom: lucas@lucaspardue.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: QUIC WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/5lw6k90HHlnP6_H2wccsjMxOnvU>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>
Hi all, During the interim meeting this week, there appeared to be emerging consensus on two open issues: * Designing odd/even path-id, or not - https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/328 * Should active_connection_id_limit ve per path or per connection? - https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/332 This email starts a 1 week consensus call to close both of these issues with no action - ending on 2024-06-12 anywhere on earth. If you have comments on either issue, please direct it to GitHub. Cheers Lucas & Matt QUIC WG Chairs
- Consensus call for two multipath QUIC issues Lucas Pardue
- Re: Consensus call for two multipath QUIC issues Lucas Pardue