Re: Consensus Calls for Late Stage Documents

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

Correct - sorry about that, my jet lag is obviously not quite finished.

Cheers,


> On 7 Jan 2020, at 9:30 am, Ian Swett <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the call, all these resolutions look great to me, but I think the PR is incorrect for the two Retry issues.
> 
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 10:57 PM Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Happy New Year, Working Group.
> 
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them late next week.
> 
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
> 
> * #3274: Encrypting Retry token
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274>
> I believe the proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120 
> 
> * #3247: I am concerned the congestion control text is too permissive.
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248>
> 
> * #3245: Make RFC 6928 normative
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3287>
> 
> * #3244: Can we make a normative ref to  RFC8085?
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248>
> 
> * #3243: Add caution when using IW10 and fragmentation 
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3280>
> 
> * #3152: Client storage of tokens should be independent of other stored state
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3150>
> 
> * #3142: It is unspecified how a server sends Handshake packets during / after migration
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145>
> 
> * #3094: congestion window increase on every ACKed packet could result in bursty sends
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3232>
> 
> * #3014: Handling of corrupt Retry packets
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274>
> Also https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120 
> 
> * #2863: unrecoverable loss pattern leads to deadlock
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145>
> 
> * #2789: Use a higher seed RTT for new paths
>    The proposal is to close with no action.
> 
> * #2744: Idle Timer Can Fire Even with Outstanding Data to Send
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266>
> 
> * #2602: Idle timeout needs more description and a recommendation
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3099>
> 
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/