Re: New Plaintext QUIC-LB Design

Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com> Tue, 12 January 2021 00:14 UTC

Return-Path: <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D613A0813 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EO2nIJx0JpK4 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x231.google.com (mail-lj1-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15A8E3A07C8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x231.google.com with SMTP id x23so903091lji.7 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:18 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=HiQenM4HzQvbA6dDB9x5jF3WUi5Iv7U9zuvVgLtHXdU=; b=uk8HqlV902MM0wRR8TNag8A1wpFZXXdFcTq9duGhYvoPtWfTlOZN6XBJzdRHt/Xgfb cn5ZmZKnx2mBL80KA6NYuG6dPabU3tuorBAYYj4Js25vZQUqtpZhK1hkUM6Z4UU0IyBB ZgOttsgdWxw4sbUQSzmfiVdIOxuLK+0YKcc37Sm4Bi1cRfCpHSzqSipsDC0Tx28ErhSn 911LH2u3xlGJ2h5axlRcFr5rLfWs9X8X0YNe8wipZNT9xzb1edGFSbinXIN5SrvXYeGi lHBtMKxxIB8iO536kiK6N2qrvF0q9Xb23PD4DvoOa7EBVCz5QwkTPIuNMi4hURtXzol0 Gkpg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=HiQenM4HzQvbA6dDB9x5jF3WUi5Iv7U9zuvVgLtHXdU=; b=lRBYbtTzIuN6Un3sRip94quEGPIw/GFhO1oj2IZO2nxlPOfaPQzLXW1LkIXcAL5JwG TZOtZtcf8ID8Gy+zUNPhOycxJ/iPwlnqkXYuELelVMBM2H9bA2jGOGKRpaM/eEx+gvN3 Osh2LbvZtOKlJhMeDd0Wr/Vg6oJwqkYz7kEjn3brs+AnCuovXL1WeWg/0Irrmb4b7Qsc 0RkjGRcoUsVl3sOgaQRSgVVM2i2iff7Nu9dme/jJy0KHQ+sA0Pvp4iMhyes45v2qlNuR 6IjDmWOiRuZOssj2sE1heZuZkPMh2clJgFltIufia9bORzDKSVxzcr82WyjwRDl4jtNz Zudw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530HSJUv/6NPw9eglCDESXz6KiqseQ2DOkoXp/0/41vq/vvFF/1l DPj3IwzjvwgsknWexAnROYo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzfiFjDI28g0MpkKabwpxBtnsPIz4ft9W7tRP3igivTrepuWfgQI0iv4ZSMgOi5Y0u/QeZPdw==
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a48f:: with SMTP id h15mr794406lji.180.1610410456959; Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobile.3.dk ([2a02:aa7:4604:5103:1d01:5a1e:a05f:e067]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y26sm149395ljk.22.2021.01.11.16.14.16 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Jan 2021 16:14:16 -0800 (PST)
From: =?utf-8?Q?Mikkel_Fahn=C3=B8e_J=C3=B8rgensen?= <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <EB8897FC-1A57-4C45-ABDE-B87E36E519E8@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_6D28215F-D7B6-41D6-A90D-193B4368C07C"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.4\))
Subject: Re: New Plaintext QUIC-LB Design
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 01:14:15 +0100
In-Reply-To: <B4D950F6-452A-4CFC-9707-DC1C9B3AB49B@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
References: <CAM4esxRRp5=-YvcPsCdsgB=8O=_RAXq05Ldma0smGsjy95T4=g@mail.gmail.com> <6B05568D-1905-4416-904C-2EEC25491920@gmail.com> <CAM4esxSyn7uEiUsYvtiUbQ=4Qt-Bp+yLYBK+re+a+V3ea0BjcQ@mail.gmail.com> <B4D950F6-452A-4CFC-9707-DC1C9B3AB49B@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.4)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/8FlgL6FCEFs-SiUAl7pGw3Z4VSc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:14:21 -0000

Sorry, the following text is out of context - it was a suggestion that I decided not to persue.

> On 12 Jan 2021, at 01.10, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> If the DCID is not understood by the LB, the LB chooses a random target server but does not store any state. The expectation being that the server will assign its own DCID on the return path.
> 
> The LB will understand how to route the server assigned DCID. The problem being that this generally requires shared state - which Low-Config aims to avoid in exchange of local state.
>