Re: Need your help: different connection IDs in the same datagram

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Thu, 16 July 2020 00:11 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A21D23A0BC6 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:11:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YQd1CQ284b7I for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com (mail-qt1-x82b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99E873A0BC5 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id 6so3487223qtt.0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:11:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2THC7MsV6uIT1faT0q7GHOQLCtezBe3FPjT+NSI6Hyk=; b=VNVRzHtR23PDi+66u3Pum8AIlFyJ88PYad5QqqT6mnbgfrtdNtCIFemp3VmgmmKppL yBhzqUXdX3FoSFTEv+c/Xz2j+kWX815P1wJYmEIm71KGTvKMyTIXTXcuxdH17TzET6cS 3t32MYDFhcuYjG+/D77q47uOWZV1NGuBObR15F77Kk9J+yTYnq3yaSDd38fd+zNLacJo hRugZxbzRilXA+XEAyoPYWfLnVzCDVijmwlKRGxglo4eP8uwne4tCUXUEkWERKx371Rg YCPKldGHGtHShBaSg2EzUbgz/CeTYx9J932PL6CiYbf06BfTA4An/8iykKTDjZiPkSjF Bctg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2THC7MsV6uIT1faT0q7GHOQLCtezBe3FPjT+NSI6Hyk=; b=h/Zarxxy0nT9TIGj8D1OjPuP+sYsflAFILfrnC3LbUzJyEbC4hsdRoYhvdDxY+Ge4S zznaUxZvWNfBy6C9hAEuU/CKzhoGSfnE5PwgvvnXas62HwB84JaRAeNq61ajMk+ChrsW 2J6GwlT5pCgbSPCl8FNfA4t6qmzC8Nf+WZhj8p9z4lXrr66uJFiOfhO1CfJivXcJVfrA KXdQjdTlIRWV04ejghNjQpWKQriBtI5N+b5FXLQS1ynYErwy2DypnsEzUPxbFTqzIk9p X87HiFuJ6LOCvpnPdP6hTydzWuHuoD5cPgelxDR5SibbM2poCTvCZ0EbReJ7FNdSwAlI loIg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kzFI8teZpRgt3/BKrqytj5+koFttZKuLpnBDHsE8aUnX6yS4c bxi0aHki9ACwEGG3CjJSB7HCFGz7E8f3mw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy7bRdXs//eOUhR3ooIuHMMNs898PFpD3v8txQiUlDXI1uu+Kp8OswkWoffBhi4pQBz3xBc7g==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:664c:: with SMTP id j12mr2635536qtp.232.1594858301334; Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:11:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lubuntu (ool-44c1d219.dyn.optonline.net. [68.193.210.25]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 140sm4271672qko.98.2020.07.15.17.11.40 for <quic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 15 Jul 2020 17:11:40 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2020 20:11:35 -0400
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Need your help: different connection IDs in the same datagram
Message-ID: <20200716001134.GF9808@lubuntu>
Mail-Followup-To: quic@ietf.org
References: <ae21cc02-3357-40c8-a1e9-3966fdf575a5@www.fastmail.com> <20200715180231.GB9808@lubuntu> <CAKcm_gPfc3sFy0kuyTzUFk2XFMZ8NdXTd7CuNf0o0v+RXDG=xg@mail.gmail.com> <CH2PR22MB20861D3BEA06EE61AA882245DA7E0@CH2PR22MB2086.namprd22.prod.outlook.com> <CAKcm_gP24=x64QwcCdki-jxFXsLKiTPH8UYFdGOG3H1YJgEbOQ@mail.gmail.com> <9b265aef-d1bd-47cc-9a1c-677eef223c73@www.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9b265aef-d1bd-47cc-9a1c-677eef223c73@www.fastmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/8S4rxOQ-17J1w7r0unTMVYT2Xxg>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 00:11:44 -0000

On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 08:49:20AM +1000, Martin Thomson wrote:
> * Receivers SHOULD discard coalesced packets if they are for a different
> connection than the first; senders MAY discard coalesced packets that
                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> contain a different value in the Destination Connection ID field than
> the first.

I don't understand this.  What do you mean by "*senders* MAY
discard packets?"

  - Dmitri.