IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Multipath Milestones

Quentin De Coninck <quentin.deconinck@uclouvain.be> Fri, 16 February 2018 13:11 UTC

Return-Path: <quentin.deconinck@uclouvain.be>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C5D127337 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:11:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=uclouvain.be
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bVlqr1Wf-KiX for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:11:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.sgsi.ucl.ac.be (smtp.sgsi.ucl.ac.be [130.104.5.67]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E089127286 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 05:11:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [130.104.228.12] (1o0-328.dhcp.info.ucl.ac.be [130.104.228.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: qdeconinck@smtp4.sgsi.ucl.ac.be) by smtp4.sgsi.ucl.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E84667DAC2; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:10:59 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=uclouvain.be; s=selucl; t=1518786659; bh=iLyR+byp7dY4EYL0hjIrPXgpqiWuR+rchUsD3AlcCK8=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=FqHRCAree8XtO10/f56BiaBneJCJKo2cch5Z729Sxcgu2onGBm4PY4azkRGJRZTE6 0yUIHhoKL3vhWRc803lHKCG7u3SiKh9Qb/F+V192SpnB8uty/m8A9D1pznqqDS+mN8 9kX1WkZrsursgtOXSCy5FAKjG8/RiEWnQ5uTBb50=
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.3-beta2 at smtp-4.sipr-dc.ucl.ac.be
Subject: Re: Multipath Milestones
To: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc: Lucas Pardue <Lucas.Pardue@bbc.co.uk>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
References: <7CF7F94CB496BF4FAB1676F375F9666A3BAE0BEA@bgb01xud1012> <DE0B9AF2-915C-42A0-85E4-C419782D46B5@netapp.com> <CAKcm_gO4gc-iek4_VKi+ekyUyWTQ0Pt-wmr=zvXdGezzXDBiNA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Quentin De Coninck <quentin.deconinck@uclouvain.be>
Message-ID: <b0a75f19-7033-db77-593b-859004d4110e@uclouvain.be>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:10:58 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAKcm_gO4gc-iek4_VKi+ekyUyWTQ0Pt-wmr=zvXdGezzXDBiNA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------CBB83CD749352F532172DA6C"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Sgsi-Spamcheck: SASL authenticated,
X-SGSI-Information:
X-SGSI-MailScanner-ID: 1E84667DAC2.A2D05
X-SGSI-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-SGSI-From: quentin.deconinck@uclouvain.be
X-SGSI-Spam-Status: No
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/9ApynbGuD3u5KnifxwvTLnnnAW4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:11:12 -0000

Hello,

Le 14/02/18 à 20:22, Ian Swett a écrit :
> I think the right path forward is for those particularly interested in 
> multipath to experiment with QUIC extensions inside v1, once the 
> extension mechanism is defined.  Once some experimentation has 
> happened, we'll be in a better place to have an informed discussion 
> about some of the points Christian raised in his multipath 
> requirements draft: 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huitema-quic-mpath-req-01 
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-huitema-quic-mpath-req-01>

I totally agree that experimenting is key. That's why we implemented the 
multipath extensions that we proposed last year in 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-deconinck-multipath-quic/

This document has evolved and we'll release a new version before the 
London IETF to take into account various comments received. In parallel 
with that, we are finalizing an iOS application that uses multipath QUIC 
to evaluate how this works in the wild. This application will perform 
various measurements to analyze the benefits of multipath. If you have 
ideas, feel free to contact me offline. If there is interest, I might be 
able to report some results with multipath QUIC in the wild at the 
London IETF.

Quentin

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email