Re: Rechartering QUIC for Post Version 1 Work

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Thu, 04 February 2021 14:48 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E48413A154D for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 06:48:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HFRRIHS0ZlNa for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 06:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:211:32ff:fe22:186f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6613A152E for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 06:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:3d97:6c98:c783:b1ac] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:3d97:6c98:c783:b1ac]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5E129600066; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:48:05 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1612450085; bh=iSWL5N9ZL1u0Mb9yYfM6ykWTqqfRHMJJMwp8kqMV2E0=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=bbQj0dCX+7JKmfr6yrO8TmsDbc7W8v28TZVZLpBeQg9QkvzVwDyOlAQpRL98gIzfV I66P5/7/1ydMPdZggzrMrxj0/ByPcDxz3UewPpiUHUXIYELNz7mq/9d+tMFAF/EeV+ S2M8WP4swyaw51Elpms1nKVYRf3wgx11Nt5oKycA=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <B0E5626F-3019-4F22-9CB1-5BB5E3807E4A@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1D6BB62F-0D17-4A16-B089-F24A11F27608"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.60.0.2.21\))
Subject: Re: Rechartering QUIC for Post Version 1 Work
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2021 16:48:04 +0200
In-Reply-To: <46B17BC6-242F-4BE2-B8C6-5B180C9DDF55@sn3rd.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
References: <CALGR9oaXpZp87ujmkDAO6Tuy=m-s8qKDY9-azpm_PhVAMfkq9A@mail.gmail.com> <20210126170048.GB364092@okhta> <D01160E4-C89E-4DF5-B0A7-C5138E33D9C1@eggert.org> <20210126170932.GC364092@okhta> <CALGR9oaO8Q7TC9zyajM20gZkZPR1cRDSv-SeDqo0MfaQbgfAjg@mail.gmail.com> <20210126184815.GD364092@okhta> <CAKcm_gNXkCko=H3VofwnubMDctCN7Smx0LDbH-ruYcTk7S4kTg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+4kVyrvmkd8vDOzASV36Y2iR2HEGzrSkxXJaMmED6JDww@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAcc8E3G2r9tzggRgz5t8ZxeqpFu4dwg4bmoLH39DnBHV-Q@mail.gmail.com> <9D6FDFBB-77E1-4AB9-84C2-376690A026DC@eggert.org> <78FF691A-EDBE-4FC8-8ECD-5D1AF05C5347@sn3rd.com> <CE6A409A-8850-438D-861F-EC30C4EB82C3@eggert.org> <46B17BC6-242F-4BE2-B8C6-5B180C9DDF55@sn3rd.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 5E129600066.AEB41
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/A7eypCFsOj3kYQ7lQWyN3hBbTSI>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 14:48:15 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-2-3, at 18:39, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> Not sure you need to combine them because the WG should maintain it’s work product, but maybe do this in the first bullet?
> 
> Maintenance and evolution of the existing WG-specified QUIC extensions.

thanks for the suggestion. A slight rephrasing of this is now in https://github.com/quicwg/wg-materials/pull/196

Thanks,
Lars