Re: QUIC paper at ACM IMC

Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com> Mon, 11 December 2017 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <jri@google.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53561128854 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:59:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R2CEr8XqlwRb for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yb0-x22b.google.com (mail-yb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 617DE124D68 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yb0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id 69so5003591ybc.6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:58:58 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XaZkKZH7R1o8UczrpYH6aqmDGla2frUlJPrZZF4j0v0=; b=ju+mSOeGf8uD7bt3BH/VsDbK+Cys6rF1+7bkGmiWtdWfZi+EOqE5VGPRc0Bc/XuiFi p0Qzf+blyBGNKlzArqlKbRglIt1ZfebvC96ukLtwEVU2VZGua6mTco5jeev7aT31+Fxr jcowt2t/aEkqk9ueQz2+dN/Pl57ycuJT9v8u8Sf78dzMS0TXM4LgBCZkfcIbAPYYztnW /n5CslFi8PV+GiIBv0zvhpwAXO9kCuow/gyTq0ugUsQKPzki7zpXilmuEKnOoeBCH2Np WbevrXxHVTeOCEAsPs07f3POvjrJwGzxSlJGLFq5nEN8qsW2H05jShbqWXwi4gL7ghqc ZPaA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XaZkKZH7R1o8UczrpYH6aqmDGla2frUlJPrZZF4j0v0=; b=Bi7I2nxcEwSM4nVTcedgHNmzZMwp5N/99hVyoxxIj/WS1GKDYInQVC0EXAjQ7IXRlN wG+shq7HRseLdmplWh6vZG2Lww6syv6CfuQ370rnkIszwcaEDhgtH2zrAPE1EWuG8Gl6 hCkfYNYkFyxRc6C9y+3MR8qi5um9UziWII3vOSL60I8Fsi1pYX3d6gmhFflw0UA7wR1d FSl6ST8n8zREwuwSZw1kbCnw2XEu7ffRorRMJOQi51OtCe7JtvqDCzujOKKC9XfvCGhO bSrC4HdEAoaEyFTCbsvpJmLxxW4mRjhZ42clzVCFkLvWOr/SAcCW/u/DPWS7v7UwuWx3 0Vbw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJaIb/RCc0BWblDhu/oeVVOSbi4fPHRXhiCNZJ0viuGQx7SW0u3 SPooAlmZZDyk5QiPN61Ln2aHEr+uOrD5vneKkda4Rw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBotlmsVqjhjwrNMh0Cr8X9kJxxGri89izPRsSi9JrkzUdQu5L9FGNW6lvXydz3QaToD92P0ozgSr3dpDNCuwg/U=
X-Received: by 10.129.82.79 with SMTP id g76mr1199951ywb.94.1513022337375; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:58:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.42.78 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:58:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAGD1bZZ2sLkufNqCxxaMBWebLD8fuwCvav2YFG2XARyGSAKLOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <9F467123-CC23-4BB1-B784-0DB7B72ECBD7@netapp.com> <CAGD1bZZ2sLkufNqCxxaMBWebLD8fuwCvav2YFG2XARyGSAKLOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:58:56 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGD1bZYJ4KPWHZfEzkmzKBV_zM6S4az_TfUFOASeyc+dZMPjhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: QUIC paper at ACM IMC
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114dac02f5864c056015f691"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/AUyjaWXbP6oIyJJ6RqNxoUnWw6U>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:59:00 -0000

(Sorry -- didn't mean to spam everyone's inbox by sending that response out
to the IETF list.)

On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Jana Iyengar <jri@google.com>; wrote:

> Yup, thanks for sharing -- I've read earlier versions of this paper. The
> results mostly agree with what we've seen and published with GQUIC
> performance IIRC, but it's a good piece of reproducible work (as against
> our work which was basically numbers out of Google). It's a good read.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:09 AM, Eggert, Lars <lars@netapp.com>; wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> in case folks hadn't seen it, there was a QUIC paper presented at this
>> year's ACM IMC conference:
>>
>> Taking a Long Look at QUIC: An Approach for Rigorous Evaluation of
>> Rapidly Evolving Transport Protocols. Arash Molavi Kakhki (Northeastern
>> University), Samuel Jero (Purdue University), David Choffnes, Alan Mislove,
>> and Cristina Nita-Rotaru (Northeastern University)
>>
>> Go to https://conferences.sigcomm.org/imc/2017/program/ and search for
>> "QUIC", paper and slides are online.
>>
>> Lars
>>
>
>