Re: Roman Danyliw's Yes on draft-ietf-quic-http-33: (with COMMENT)

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Tue, 19 January 2021 23:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCCBF3A1885; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:34:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id My3NieRzPqgD; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:34:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AF3B3A1884; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:34:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id e9so7297752plh.3; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:34:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=URne5hYm/5nZQhv7gJBMsIbTt2XYB0o20yMAYuWdxFk=; b=Y7f10zAAOqyGJeApogs6zWeK05lfWblsohm+Iu/S+wWYwGhe32WepMjUMBlxPw0SRK 6m9xk1T5hPEb+xpbyi4yV8vPvcjTxVHhluRUyIss2vJIfH3dOsfKGpSHiabhtXENvb1L D2dLz42EMhM1XZeJ0gpmEY37WZfnn/bTDOEAlbLKM1x5S0zm+3fpWiiR1yAINZugoXL3 Poi+6YjjeeXHi7KcVugpBANU5+bebkCBqNbDkKgr08ur6jakstaJkuYTvJDJpFgM4cNT SfO9VAKnqikGKjQYkv42uaGoozPe/QNaHStndFnw5B6s/oU4bY8Fm355k6XIF6q5Y3UZ ot8A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=URne5hYm/5nZQhv7gJBMsIbTt2XYB0o20yMAYuWdxFk=; b=lBDH5Y3Jzw4ORTBnGW6TnBp0bURt+eBg+kzvZz98IwNmkRoLZnsUbMHsijQClrsUZO tncYDUw9w1nZ47O55SyLQb8hkPNUt6L9uQ6X4UC8QY85mKvN0VcAow3VDZK1MHwJiMZ/ ZMiA9n8f9lch+dazNVgbNd7cpYBJRx96lOMuzs4kTl+Ja91TKCThBIAJv9k4I+6dK75Z 4DEG2FSSb7i0YZpOFnWc/N8hh7CemxtO8K+70nexvNwyWTvfw1cQZQxbXKh5FttLujhd ULnD2MQByIohSZL5vb4HDo53u/g0Uw6VFyLM0h2FIJBq8TsSchm19331a2t4OAn9cWc4 pY1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531lKvZnGim46Tk5RRC1cY7Xm5YsmPN8Kw0w7gUOnXkc4Ot0Yv2Z zmyLGr2kmziTxZRsnIz4Zkklp4UquwLXO3SbF1DKqAa2aD4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzVjyspU14BhRvnhvLegdmQh0SzU+GXORty69oJyPqSJ/rqP2raZSQTTDq2FzPrMEyslWBOMVOir50jJHQLb68=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:517:: with SMTP id h23mr2307243pjh.108.1611099250982; Tue, 19 Jan 2021 15:34:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <161109891722.24613.15942373190818360435@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <161109891722.24613.15942373190818360435@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:33:59 +0000
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZ7Ch5DO4MrrOCuftqtVcMShzp60muNi3i5GdOm7FDdtw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's Yes on draft-ietf-quic-http-33: (with COMMENT)
To: Roman Danyliw <rdd@cert.org>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-quic-http@ietf.org, WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000008d830505b94946b5"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/AxVZXalr2_t3_cSEgTkFg9Cid2o>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 23:34:14 -0000

Hi Roman,

Thanks for the review. I've created a GitHub issue to track each comment on
the QUIC WG repository, see the URL in line.

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:28 PM Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-quic-http-33: Yes
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-http/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> The work on this document and its companions is greatly appreciated!
>
> Thank you to Hilarie Orman for the SECDIR review.
>
> ** Section 3.1.  “The host must be listed either as the CN field …”, why
> not a
> normative MUST just as there is in the next sentence around the required
> use of
> iPAddress?
>

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4763


> ** Section 3.3  Per “Once a connection exists to a server endpoint, this
> connection MAY be reused for requests with multiple different URI authority
> components”, it might be worth repeating here that in cases of https,
> changes
> in the authority components still need to occur within the bounds of the
> certificate validation practices noted in Section 3.1 and in Section 4.3.4
> of
> draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics.
>

https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4764

Cheers
Lucas
On behalf of QUIC WG Chairs