IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Q and L loss bits: which is which?

"Lubashev, Igor" <ilubashe@akamai.com> Wed, 20 November 2019 02:06 UTC

Return-Path: <ilubashe@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811171207FF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:06:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8bMBv1wnkQJx for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9001:583::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58D5C12012C for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 18:06:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050095.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xAK260ZH030108; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:06:16 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=DoV/mmYPRzRnkUTv5dy0KqBp8ovMdC66QaNQ2fRlxXs=; b=GS9lvcpQoyFGPZ745CHSxrvNpeZ2mMAf927lTBPp48F/IwpMpLZVQJ+X01JE+WpyVyqD tpfNmERdHYS0kf/pe3bKy5BkZmuECOGjqmTmE/v7jV1oJLY5JAGrrrWo3nExIzyJyXR/ Y5woYYiFy7bzkIDZBTsso+HSqOuBNy+knafunBdeb6h+2HzuEJbWi3VlH1YCu5gVA0IY j81RjNwBciCTT+CyrT3JZrAzL3imHywgN67DPEIO9mnins4E4ecoVz8yFkh5BrAnF5D0 7bSb8UOVamEV3VVBa/3TlXkk96Md2+2lLDuOIlDKI0nWxSuUU2IGgcXDlvR1+MgI9hOI 0g==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint3 (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [96.6.114.86] (may be forged)) by m0050095.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2wafwvgam1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:06:16 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xAK22sM6008781; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:06:15 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.116]) by prod-mail-ppoint3.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2wadb1tbk4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 19 Nov 2019 21:06:14 -0500
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) by ustx2ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:06:12 -0600
Received: from USTX2EX-DAG1MB5.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.123]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.123]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Tue, 19 Nov 2019 20:06:12 -0600
From: "Lubashev, Igor" <ilubashe@akamai.com>
To: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>, Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
CC: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, "alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com" <alexandre.ferrieux@orange.com>
Subject: RE: Q and L loss bits: which is which?
Thread-Topic: Q and L loss bits: which is which?
Thread-Index: AQHVnuYxGYRqnRW1T0W5CpBoQ1gaSaeS98cAgAAFaICAAEgOgIAAQQmAgAAp0gD//58nEA==
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:06:11 +0000
Message-ID: <cd2e9389a61d49eabad2b0fac2f4db96@ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <20191119143218.GB2789@ubuntu-dmitri> <24388_1574174932_5DD400D4_24388_372_7_1574174948.30247.49.camel@orange.com> <20191119150829.GD2789@ubuntu-dmitri> <20191119192622.GE2789@ubuntu-dmitri> <a21bc373-1fda-836e-7efc-599832ae575d@huitema.net> <20191120014850.GC16017@ubuntu-dmitri>
In-Reply-To: <20191120014850.GC16017@ubuntu-dmitri>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.216.181]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-11-19_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=903 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1911200019
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-11-19_08:2019-11-15,2019-11-19 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 phishscore=0 clxscore=1011 mlxlogscore=873 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 malwarescore=0 adultscore=0 mlxscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1911200018
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/BJxs-uUWucLHvN0ioS2D8UJrRWk>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 02:06:19 -0000

> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 9:49 AM, Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 07:19:09AM +0800, Christian Huitema wrote:
> > I am willing to do the same in Picoquic, but I would really like to
> > get the transport parameter defined first.
> 
> Once there is a TP and a draft, we plan to include this option into main line of
> lsquic.

Thanks, Dmitri and Christian.  We are getting great feedback now, which we are absorbing.  Plus, there are privacy guidelines to carefully consider and refine.  So I'd expect a draft in about 2-3 weeks.

- Igor

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email