Re: Greasing the QUIC Bit

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Thu, 02 July 2020 12:57 UTC

Return-Path: <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998E83A0857 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 05:57:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gmZOOmwHT1Up for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 05:57:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (mx4.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:2218:2::4:12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8C253A0852 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 05:57:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx4.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id AA1BB280668; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 500) id A3BF42806AB; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay01.prive.nic.fr (unknown [10.1.50.11]) by mx4.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C505280668; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from b12.nic.fr (b12.tech.ipv6.nic.fr [IPv6:2001:67c:1348:7::86:133]) by relay01.prive.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97F6364C6C03; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by b12.nic.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 85D9E3FCDB; Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:57:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2020 14:57:35 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net>
Cc: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Greasing the QUIC Bit
Message-ID: <20200702125735.GA31502@nic.fr>
References: <5943e1bd-fba9-473b-a20f-7992ad0579ab@www.fastmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5943e1bd-fba9-473b-a20f-7992ad0579ab@www.fastmail.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux 10.4
X-Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-9-amd64 x86_64
X-Charlie: Je suis Charlie
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.2.2
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.0.2142326, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2019.11.5.63017
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/BKZtJiSfuFXksSoosfLPsF9JaNA>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2020 12:57:40 -0000

On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 09:01:08PM +1000,
 Martin Thomson <mt@lowentropy.net> wrote 
 a message of 7 lines which said:

> That's a shame, so I wrote a draft explaining how that might not
> need to be true forever.

Isn't it the point of draft-ietf-quic-invariants? If it is not an
invariant, it may change.