Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues

Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel@apple.com> Mon, 13 September 2021 00:15 UTC

Return-Path: <vidhi_goel@apple.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28F93A0AB2 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.452, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=apple.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id igsPa4atVFuu for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp34.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp34.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CACE73A0AB0 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp34.rno.apple.com [127.0.0.1]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp34.rno.apple.com (8.16.1.2/8.16.1.2) with SMTP id 18D0Bvkx010938; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:32 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apple.com; h=from : message-id : content-type : mime-version : subject : date : in-reply-to : cc : to : references; s=20180706; bh=dpeyNtrKuRbB40PF1MZSpHZoGoRxcXtofTJBpvF0ZRU=; b=GceVS0ra7iow+OZKMjVrvHXUKvF1RL8ksiX1jLlRFzVg9RnP0NTVVs5NOvDZLSAUfyTB YtgCEV8FBxSExzaKhyW38EWynUd9yfKtKLM/1WKi2cBzSCGl0FNoDDS6Sa6qq/5uYqBB m1fVH4xhcq0hMiAj6ykRHRlVi83HmQxtazqOFE2NNv/ZL3g7nIY83RNXcBNOlOq6pnFl Wf1L2RbzuPW0wL9Y8DmR8ECywO1RGwFTKWsvxHF6GkZyxDM9d7hk26iyvXwaNKkjnKYP rZ5cgoU3+cVEJBQ2EHid2uUVfhsqw9rBRXCHo3JNjmM5hq1BI9/A7nQp2Ihvc2RPJzCg iw==
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com [10.225.203.151]) by rn-mailsvcp-ppex-lapp34.rno.apple.com with ESMTP id 3b0ra0sg09-5 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:32 -0700
Received: from rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com [17.179.253.14]) by rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.9.20210415 64bit (built Apr 15 2021)) with ESMTPS id <0QZC0044OJDU4300@rn-mailsvcp-mta-lapp03.rno.apple.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from process_milters-daemon.rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.9.20210415 64bit (built Apr 15 2021)) id <0QZC00300J6R8700@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Va-A:
X-Va-T-CD: 8154b23b3511e33f7d3c4e1c60118686
X-Va-E-CD: bf56dcef6b871f13a54b6fd9c8d5204c
X-Va-R-CD: 18271e72beda2ae0ae55aee66ec60300
X-Va-CD: 0
X-Va-ID: 8818a711-c34a-4c06-b34f-260c02acada2
X-V-A:
X-V-T-CD: 8154b23b3511e33f7d3c4e1c60118686
X-V-E-CD: bf56dcef6b871f13a54b6fd9c8d5204c
X-V-R-CD: 18271e72beda2ae0ae55aee66ec60300
X-V-CD: 0
X-V-ID: 05c0cfd6-e458-4cb1-86c9-b581ba1ef21a
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-09-12_10:2021-09-09, 2021-09-12 signatures=0
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [17.234.23.36]) by rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 8.1.0.9.20210415 64bit (built Apr 15 2021)) with ESMTPSA id <0QZC0116KJDU7000@rn-mailsvcp-mmp-lapp01.rno.apple.com>; Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:30 -0700 (PDT)
From: Vidhi Goel <vidhi_goel@apple.com>
Message-id: <57EEEB0A-8003-4057-B205-7CADD94EEAB9@apple.com>
Content-type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_C710EE84-4055-4890-A475-78B0983C085A"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha-256
MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.11\))
Subject: Re: Two Notable Ack Frequency Issues
Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2021 17:15:30 -0700
In-reply-to: <CAKcm_gPe_0E3Yje=qT07hC2uSt+srWT7EwbhiYNsPq8Q+pFFiw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <CAKcm_gPe_0E3Yje=qT07hC2uSt+srWT7EwbhiYNsPq8Q+pFFiw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.11)
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.391, 18.0.790 definitions=2021-09-12_10:2021-09-09, 2021-09-12 signatures=0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/BkTh1bBrncK6iRYJUppopis8VVk>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 00:15:39 -0000

Hi Ian,

> One issue not discussed(#48 <https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/issues/48>) regarding ECN CE
Left a comment on this PR - https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/pull/68 <https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/pull/68>

Vidhi

> On Sep 11, 2021, at 4:50 PM, Ian Swett <ianswett=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Most of the outstanding design issues were discussed at the last IETF meeting and had clear resolutions.  As such, I think we're close to being ready to ship this draft.
> 
> One issue not discussed(#48 <https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/issues/48>) regarding ECN CE and a new issue(#65 <https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency/issues/65>) adding a NO_ACK frame are notable changes and have not received wide discussion, so I wanted to publicize them here before merging any changes.
> 
> I think both changes are heading in the right direction, and both have PRs you can comment on.
> 
> I'd like to merge these in a week or so if there's no pushback, so please take a look when you have time.
> 
> Thanks, Ian