Re: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues, week of 2 September

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Fri, 13 September 2019 03:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9369C120033 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=bSGFS0wU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=EQ+2ZuqA
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MYdep8iylgmq for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7D0A120013 for <quic@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 20:49:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE2F20CCC; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:49:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:49:09 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=O FIbQPc9yKBhXhw3Ew0FLZTUuVI3UqxBDdk8v9K3QjQ=; b=bSGFS0wU/9pTZlrM1 GVNk36d8Y+zIjnqBWWQs6N9hkMssjp3Fhd9yaF1uM3QpMEABRUvBmYY7YD7QWE+M 9kkC5FVYfMsST0vvCK4/j+5Pni3Uf0Vs0ngB3Obx+HvQwVmHmrUMdcnTOA5D/6PY ccLG7LWPK77W6LxN21UE54qPT4v6kh0JPcY0hzpoVtaxCauMQ6QBjeRd6oyWS1uU xiUtoEE7se5o1SUfB/1074WneCcgUJ1RM/pBd1Klj6qgt4DNhTGiQv/Q4eO92asX KJIG55NOboCY0bRobmdRzp+0MlkepnLGJxzV18lb/Am4tzM7TNrZ9xWLLiBKDBYa mfNQg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=OFIbQPc9yKBhXhw3Ew0FLZTUuVI3UqxBDdk8v9K3Q jQ=; b=EQ+2ZuqA11q50E+FvSWT0sKDmbBXH0jEVOLpMEewFgGJC6GRt3ruUSulV fnxgQA8SEWve3PeI5ptboWhaSdWtDnEG7X1i4x5c8izKdcQu9xZE8MtSFyPXpMCg lyVpyLyE3C7NShGrg2j0dlBTmXMLHkw+1qw6NP75Gv9jWawqcgV/esL2gWVs2k47 DjSh/F7rUJ5zBUY84OQoygqMwpvWcyoXgxyUduskr8VR2JRyeESNSOBtJC42Skue Su6G5HDZNhC/hb95GH8rq+9iagBp2XqdKxUCSwT7dYhNC64AOTpKo0t80n/o3u4t 0FtX2iIiTa781BlYPO6K+wxbFomoA==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:tBF7XeTue9Zzyju0HLc035ZEk_CF2C0eUaV_U2vJwgtPv7bGly2mCQ>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrtdeigdejiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghrkhcu pfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrihhnpe hgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppeduvddurddvtddtrdejrddu geegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehmnhhothesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecuve hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:tBF7XRdIARl3JMEqTg4xdOW9QFAm8VQk-vbOu8kXJjxPOHxxt2c-Jg> <xmx:tBF7XWTy3_N4XK9NwuFDemcRacvjZV2D04nrnd3HrXQxYQal1AaAOg> <xmx:tBF7XSMuGkAst96jTTXvj9lv5dqX6kC16KWUZyVdfmtpVCSb6OpBTA> <xmx:tRF7XQEuHextaQWmaKhKu-Y_sQyIhJRkHDwkdIuil-6nyttlFaV0PQ>
Received: from attitudadjuster.mnot.net (121-200-7-144.79c807.syd.nbn.aussiebb.net [121.200.7.144]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id BF23380060; Thu, 12 Sep 2019 23:49:07 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues, week of 2 September
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <B6ED2EFC-BBA2-4A51-AEE5-4C1C0AC17BB1@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 13:49:03 +1000
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <45F0BAE9-722B-4733-9042-C7D1CADC9B1A@mnot.net>
References: <B6ED2EFC-BBA2-4A51-AEE5-4C1C0AC17BB1@mnot.net>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Bkav1K9JnhA0ajB65ImtgOek3XA>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 03:49:15 -0000

Consensus declared.


> On 3 Sep 2019, at 6:59 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them next week.
> 
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
> 
> * #2978: Empty NEW_TOKEN
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2977>
> 
> * #2778: CID change still required in response to migration?
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2969>
> 
> * #2171: ChaCha inputs
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2990>
> 
> * #2153: Increase the odds of a stateless reset?
>   The proposal is that the resolution to this was implied by <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/2869> (i.e., close with no action)
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/