Re: IETF hosting vs. Github
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu> Tue, 08 June 2021 08:40 UTC
Return-Path: <w@1wt.eu>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6D23A2821 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 01:40:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.096
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, MONEY_NOHTML=2.497, NA_DOLLARS=1.498, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rtxPgC38KSoN for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 01:40:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 1wt.eu (wtarreau.pck.nerim.net [62.212.114.60]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728BB3A281B for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 01:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from willy@localhost) by pcw.home.local (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 1588edq9021489; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 10:40:39 +0200
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 10:40:39 +0200
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF hosting vs. Github
Message-ID: <20210608084039.GB21317@1wt.eu>
References: <20210607123854.GA16312@nic.fr> <CAC7UV9bkqOeCgDsCH+Hdq0v=zmRKNNDtpfiq6Ap_vzm5zUzGVg@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oZiUe5TyY3Tv432__GH=v+Lpv2EZah0G4ZD+g3E2FkaMg@mail.gmail.com> <20210607130422.GA27971@sources.org> <EE723B6D-7B6B-4B68-A4A1-F1809CF68F1B@gmail.com> <20210607142015.GA31240@sources.org> <C1B56269-0EF7-42EC-8824-70F7485807B2@gmail.com> <20210607190027.GC5394@sources.org> <7CE3F7FC-21C1-4519-AA60-A2FDFFC512EE@gbiv.com> <20210608074216.GA23743@sources.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <20210608074216.GA23743@sources.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/CGBHF1h_jQlapFMKcNbta47p-Ro>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2021 08:40:54 -0000
Stéphane, On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:42:16AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 12:42:40PM -0700, > Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote > a message of 45 lines which said: > > > > (And having important discussions on a Microsoft platform not > > > controlled by the IETF is a bad idea, anyway, but I digress.) > > > > The IETF does not have the resources to provide a comparable issue > > tracking system, let alone one that manages PRs and version control > > for authors, while providing extensive search capabilities at the > > same time. It's a tool. > > The IETF has a budget of ten million US dollars > <https://www.ietf.org/blog/ietf-2021-draft-budget/> and cannot > self-host a Gitlab or a Gitea? It is hard to believe. Like Roy said, it's a tool. I personally don't like it much essentially for UI concerns which I find difficult to use and sadly, these trouble were replicated by their competitors, but what I like even less is having to deal with plenty of accounts everywhere. Github, like it or not, has become a de-facto standard and plenty of people active in the HTTP ecosystem already have an account on it, which fluidifies interactions compared to another approach where one will always have to ask "what's my account again?". I personally don't care about what tools the IETF (and the WG) are using, I'm pretty sure that the various tools run on servers built by large companies, running processors, RAM and storage designed and built by other large companies, and that data are transmitted over wires/fibers also operated by various large companies, maybe even encrypted and signed using certificates issued by large companies. As long as the service is delivered, that's what matters to me. One concern could be that all discussions in issues would need to be archived though (I don't know if they are nor how to do that). Because my personal feeling is that while relying more on issues has significantly improved the focus and reduced bikeshedding, it has also significantly reduced exposure to certain points, and we don't have the archives of these discussions anymore in our respective mailboxes. But this is something unrelated to the tools but to the process, and Gitlab or any other tool wouldn't change anything to this. Regards, Willy
- A question about user tracking with QUIC Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Robin MARX
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Lucas Pardue
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Töma Gavrichenkov
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Christian Huitema
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Roy T. Fielding
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Lucas Pardue
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Christian Huitema
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Lucas Pardue
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Christian Huitema
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Roberto Peon
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Behcet Sarikaya
- IETF hosting vs. Github Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: IETF hosting vs. Github Willy Tarreau
- Re: IETF hosting vs. Github Lars Eggert
- Re: IETF hosting vs. Github Willy Tarreau
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Mirja Kuehlewind
- Re: A question about user tracking with QUIC Mirja Kuehlewind