IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Packet number encryption

Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net> Thu, 01 February 2018 00:44 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@huitema.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C3F112D835 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:44:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YkmgG5GdgZQe for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:44:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com (mx43-out1.antispamcloud.com [138.201.61.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC17A12E899 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 16:44:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xsmtp03.mail2web.com ([168.144.250.223]) by mx12.antispamcloud.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1eh2zM-0006dY-57 for quic@ietf.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2018 01:44:28 +0100
Received: from [10.5.2.14] (helo=xmail04.myhosting.com) by xsmtp03.mail2web.com with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from <huitema@huitema.net>) id 1eh2zI-0000xy-JI for quic@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 19:44:26 -0500
Received: (qmail 3515 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2018 00:44:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.200.68]) (Authenticated-user:_huitema@huitema.net@[72.235.171.77]) (envelope-sender <huitema@huitema.net>) by xmail04.myhosting.com (qmail-ldap-1.03) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; 1 Feb 2018 00:44:18 -0000
To: quic@ietf.org
References: <CABkgnnVyo3MmWtVULiV=FJTnR528qfY8-OmKGWAs0bCvri-a_g@mail.gmail.com> <1F7FB3B8-A94C-4354-9944-FB09FB8DB68B@trammell.ch> <CABcZeBMbwdwyC9TxxHBLYaZKfNB-FG2wCGjqUZ_mNR-A1R47FA@mail.gmail.com> <9096e5ec-581e-875a-b1dd-bff0b05206fd@huitema.net> <CABkgnnWRQSAufwPss+qf=xAzCwRYeNNH8XLPm3yFaHxOb+ba4g@mail.gmail.com> <BF80500A-6277-45DC-8525-9C3FE138B76D@tik.ee.ethz.ch> <827BA6F8-5CA8-420A-B18B-60D8BC134A46@fb.com> <CABkgnnUD5CfhNiRhB897pjbi2MQMbcar89SKEgEJepgOsuUc2A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+9kkMCU2VuaOesXjqa44A48KyLV-KRGhV6uXrtmMkpLpJyiBA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@huitema.net>
Message-ID: <7502d843-d164-1846-064a-d214325ddfe2@huitema.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:44:19 -1000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CA+9kkMCU2VuaOesXjqa44A48KyLV-KRGhV6uXrtmMkpLpJyiBA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: Packet number encryption
X-Originating-IP: 168.144.250.223
X-AntiSpamCloud-Domain: xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-AntiSpamCloud-Username: 168.144.250.0/24
Authentication-Results: antispamcloud.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=168.144.250.0/24@xsmtpout.mail2web.com
X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Class: unsure
X-AntiSpamCloud-Outgoing-Evidence: Combined (0.18)
X-Recommended-Action: accept
X-Filter-ID: EX5BVjFpneJeBchSMxfU5gmGh8xhScR3GQeG/UsE/mMXv9krsgRhBn0ayn6qsUc7A2kcKDr1fzRm ksYYe0sWHrgNzB/4Jkrw1eDLcif59ftjlCLaU+2VAPNwxKB1g+mPB98yDTitFWvbHwz9vKZpm4b3 Kv7PcFSfRyFbnU/eNYd851TaRAUkTN+SrghOjOYzZsQEbaxxISMHgJxrdMdSS4B6hVJPXxgisa+g wkHvC+PVG1YjIrFRKhESMT/tU1Dx+IHaAZrg1ulFniksjLYqZxdG5bOwa1rOgT+89+/XFrGt2tce crpXRY6fm8RXptyzavERpop5LF7RavHozgbn9XzprFRbpFQTOcEGeQOY3IcDlgJpEbxunV7tCPNi PQvHQpVRoYcix47lJTuKsG8TgnDHFRDF834rtLc6Wv9Yj+vBPX9bzGJi0ycLbiOUDEySIK/1NH5T HMtlYvyHAYGOGheVSH7cGoIH3Vd41lbD31Vm3SIdO3BpR97t9bfBi5FxwJWxe4AVanuu6Qx5p47D Rdeg5FXAoSVmuTiBe7bp0P/GvVLPSj+Hlyh2mculO/W8NktFVcl6hrIDm43UklXgo0rGkb5OztVl OoF8rUUHwR1JLObs/ksVBOHvEAgSr8kAN1Mi/5oPXF0IaYXV2I96ukONoJfh+XjGSeeT90H/uIEs fgSnSGa2hcOygD/l+1E1G4dsgIjOglxo7PfKvIvqBmbjO41FyBEqIaDudcVplPEfgkCmu0AbpCDt lYGBUhlW87eqULwgkV+w1Dqc0gmbgvfFcHV2tQAVqGdj/zM7G/FqHXIoSsvffuCdDqwWbJR15ft9 Iz0WDtXlRni5HCCJM9Qvlo9UV7vdWttsewtXKowaEO652uo+6xHVEn43gl09gN9PtOEBx/RKpFEr HkJ0VfjEzm1SsR8v3aJbN/NZfa/pGyl0Yc/hSh4fhbFqiL7w
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@quarantine5.antispamcloud.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Cey3p71uYZIwrnXNqtX1n74J968>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 00:44:49 -0000


On 1/31/2018 2:32 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
> I still like this design, but I think we have to be careful in how we
> describe its benefits; it's not going to break all linkability and
> it's not going to make connection migration or multipath that much
> easier.  I think that means we should take Mirja's comments on the
> implementation costs seriously.  Ekr has already given an estimate,
> and I would appreciate estimates from other groups as well.

About implementation cost, maybe we should wait for feedback from the
actual implementations. Only Lars commented so far, and his feedback was
"no big deal". If Lars is correct, we ought to be able to demonstrate
interoperability soon after draft-10 is published. In any case, we will
have some good feedback on actual implementation cost.

-- Christian Huitema

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email