IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-30 non-implementable, please

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Tue, 11 August 2020 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D893A0B75 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:55:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ubf94ZlFCqR for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:55:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD8523A08FA for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id f12so12302538wru.13 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:55:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uS7hM5SoUaw/C1Wm2Em/Nr+UpIqn3STYAsq1ZtmTwfk=; b=kXie/wtrb5azvMOuQcKy5Kpe0uYTAT1aLJWYvH3LlbvFwnYCW0c3xYFdbXUd9csmZ/ i/Xpv9Zjcgi81Lm2Y5rWkOn8W2GSQkVimchDGw0vXNJZlnJvIoyhbRxmb+WS8mP9j4TO 6UsV2ZmJZomWunGvUWnjKg77Y2TaSoyEZMZRPxwbBg2i1jCmREFS/gb8S/6w+lCPKdf7 1vfwyGSJvxVO61May8xKChtzEM2LX6cQoHDpWbALuKXjP/8qxZ8JdNUd7NzshpT72Kdw Otbj7RvW1vTdPCdZHrcqrIIiOxdK6Fc2qTIjnWMQIQPevCBgFC0s7i9J7R7INNN/B5vu BUaw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uS7hM5SoUaw/C1Wm2Em/Nr+UpIqn3STYAsq1ZtmTwfk=; b=ZQ+oJ3iPX3VsC4Lql4ZPUTC9tLAoo8n+KYPGg+VhL88CInTZ9LfGpyi/EFGTTHfPaf O2YLd1hALtv9ieqY5q3CIYKRevjERLdigfmKAMlq51PDAfWeFRB+O6dSEUsvYrio1a47 7pN9XI2MZr9ZO9TiAYv8AfjKxJUZ9UpkgFgyZ0Jblozf+gBjuSwIi5cyek5aZpLc7pwh LK5i3lWbnkmaIyTeCC+72wNWqzJdZJAkYPtffjeAf4Y+X6x9LRzgp2GyTjkE9+/TIll7 KJ4kj33QnlDUgJKhClM599xwuQEHWbDvvhcK20MmmWmUP9Bipsvf/bwF8nH7wpQwX6m7 Ongg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532RbMtV+mu4U9LKC1y17A8Qq2Hw4xQ4dNC35YFzVi8pH/V0uiy3 SLKrf8xTDufAAmC51uSYj8xNYwoz3E/mwBA8nt0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzuFz+h9+4+3ezKUQe2B1FBc2Iizheiyte+Zjdsi9r7t3gaZKp4f2D/GZIOMnfQUpMCUt5GKeMWFglmwOWX5WM=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ba05:: with SMTP id o5mr30339329wrg.7.1597168506106; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 10:55:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxQ3zqBxLgPpFnCvnJM7WACGoOaMHHZU2NfS1uqH1rv2+A@mail.gmail.com> <CAKDhxQq7Y9qb9-JaOEoStYSy8VdxcUj5jg6V7ZHhNpo3rv3Rmg@mail.gmail.com> <CALGR9oZUOuW2BJgQ5_oF_Y1=MCH=+se6CZRxsq0N2nCFCRz3tg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oZUOuW2BJgQ5_oF_Y1=MCH=+se6CZRxsq0N2nCFCRz3tg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 18:54:54 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9obGp7JXHYPEMgJ+i81ehwZmvkC9fLBTfboLYt1ANwXfLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-30 non-implementable, please
To: Ryan Hamilton <ryan@optimism.cc>
Cc: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000073f73805ac9dc5c6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/D80ObhgbKwBchhJkUpw997mwtCY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:55:26 -0000

whoops [1]

[1] -
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-quic-transport&url2=https://quicwg.github.io/base-drafts/draft-ietf-quic-transport.txt

On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 6:54 PM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 6:46 PM Ryan Hamilton <ryan@optimism.cc> wrote:
>
>> Completely agree. If -30 is compatible with -29 let's keep the same "on
>> the wire" versioning so that we can maximize the probability of successful
>> communication!
>>
>
> Speaking as an individual, the struggle I have is that 29 to 30 is not a
> no-op. You can look at the current diff for transport [1] and see that
> we're sarig down the barrel of 10 design issues with proposals. So as an
> endpoint that implements 30-not-30, if I speak to an endpoint that is
> barely-29 and I have issues, what is my recourse? I really don't want to
> get into UA sniffing to build in branching code...
>
> Lucas
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email