Re: -16 drafts

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Wed, 24 October 2018 00:29 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABkgnnXBM-TXyfddDKEEqis3d+rsdjYRAWsaJtPNWjaN8jJbxQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnXBM-TXyfddDKEEqis3d+rsdjYRAWsaJtPNWjaN8jJbxQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 01:28:46 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9obh3PKCDKBcLYmEmw+A5T-hL-K0UbxhuwBx4FPknip0VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: -16 drafts
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000767cbe0578ee927c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/DC56B3VZJJaxm8DODNFeQacnK-k>
Precedence: list

Great stuff, thanks editors and contributors!

On Wed, 24 Oct 2018, 01:26 Martin Thomson, <martin.thomson@gmail.com> wrote:

> As you can see, there are new drafts.  There wasn't going to be, but
> we took advantage of the deadline extension.
>
> These drafts look a lot different to the -15 drafts, but there should
> be no substantive technical changes.  But there has been a ton of
> editorial work done.  The editors are of the view that the structure
> is now more stable.  There is still a good amount of cleanup to do to
> make things stitch together more coherently, but it shouldn't be
> structural.
>
> If you had been holding back on editorial comments in your reviews of
> the docs, hold back no longer.  As always, pull requests are the
> preferred form of currency (short of actual currency, that is).
>
>

-16 drafts Martin Thomson
Re: -16 drafts Lucas Pardue