IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Differentiate between GQUIC and QUIC packets

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Tue, 01 August 2017 03:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C61131CEF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:28:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BdoPbzv8ok_x for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x232.google.com (mail-qk0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B33B131CE4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:28:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x232.google.com with SMTP id u139so2421372qka.1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZxyUja4jvwDJ+Sd9vBfO/1dWPq3Epi6AgpHzgFwgUHs=; b=vn1JwJ6Fkii2UTL+f5dxl1cKPPGgTewwKUEl51Y7YPuFK+J9o9bug1+/wzv1dCDtcZ 8TSg2AwZC2lEghESQ9iO4yQtwhcuOn83x2fwGTWIlwwYmRSWrNzxQf96AcDHcuEMMMLq GvZj9dtuKi4oXFVgZbVDBn1rywFWH8UDo+H9NMmDiolNJ9loIc1NVXJV4r4zPI2XiCjq hiS3IBPT4YYw7eV6Lj+525T0MR+vi4hvkwGOvuaR4ONUVpI1gqXYRar6iOzBLRvp7qpW sx7/1w5OvccJeVVmLR5HRWGwGM7DxujBV8XCzlIkOjggqjLLc7PGKAN6FhJ+pTBw/Tfx vA4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ZxyUja4jvwDJ+Sd9vBfO/1dWPq3Epi6AgpHzgFwgUHs=; b=U8Med9jBoBzPT2LbRyxv4B/4VZoEEsge08GltKZpAwN5JkygoGu16/ez5UQ/Q4Pu8O zB9MPUr9s9O2tCdRguzDr165paAuF7BV6QbeQ6WFwtfmilXMf2hc+yklcs9LctLjcxd6 52R8FBT5cBGcUdOGSlc9Eep8ENOfKIUSPNalocMgfnPa8zkPafOQ6zliEiFF8GSaquXg NXcx6ZvymIlO7hfsmD/2m/jErDOQrHle/5hPSpraHTsL27fEJMOQZqymcirfZcqDspeg JJpgV4hDUD6tIHNyU5UMFjb6eTTLZY5CyGiKOPeY5s7VbzvSW0jPMf074SKMjROIpmuY FhQw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw113L2qH9xGjys1TtEZnAHN+jgaw2+9KuM8DQjOGPFCCoFU8AqkJS 8sCpoqNT/HN19o4Tfhc=
X-Received: by 10.55.27.154 with SMTP id m26mr22106204qkh.135.1501558092928; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-45715890.dyn.optonline.net. [69.113.88.144]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 131sm20851150qki.23.2017.07.31.20.28.12 for <quic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 20:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 23:28:05 -0400
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Differentiate between GQUIC and QUIC packets
Message-ID: <20170801032805.GA29894@ubuntu-dmitri>
References: <20170801032502.GA28788@ubuntu-dmitri>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170801032502.GA28788@ubuntu-dmitri>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/DCTMPpnSabY1tTTYIrZ6ky3E2Qk>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2017 03:28:15 -0000

On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:25:02PM -0400, Dmitri Tikhonov wrote:
> 1) GQUIC vs QUIC long-header format packet
> 
>     This is straightforward: the first byte in GQUIC must be zero,
                               ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>     whereas in QUIC's long-header format packet it is set to one.

This should read "the high bit of the first byte" -- sorry about
that.

  - Dmitri.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email