Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 13 December 2020 07:38 UTC

Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0864401082787303364=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20201213073828.3F3EC240057@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 02:38:28 -0500
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/DLmm6VkUynSRueI9EqLQc7Kq9mE>
Precedence: list



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+2/-9/💬41)
  2 issues created:
  - Clarify header protection sampling  (by larseggert)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc] 
  - Pakcet loss problem in Quic (by LyraWang)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4433 

  11 issues received 41 new comments:
  - #4435 Clarify header protection sampling  (7 by PaulDance, janaiyengar, kazuho, larseggert)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4433 Pakcet loss problem in Quic (7 by LyraWang, larseggert)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4433 
  - #4393 Idempotency and replay (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4393 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4380 IANA review of -transport; overall correctness (5 by gloinul, larseggert, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4380 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4379 IANA review of -transport; question 4 (1 by janaiyengar)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4379 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4378 IANA review of -transport; question 3 (1 by larseggert)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4376 IANA review of -transport; question 1 (3 by LPardue, gloinul)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4376 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4369 IANA review of -tls (4 by DavidSchinazi, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4369 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] 
  - #4336 Error code for illegal field composition (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4336 [-http] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4280 No IANA version registry (2 by LPardue, gloinul)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4280 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - #4257 Path Challenge Padding and Amplification Protection (9 by DavidSchinazi, MikeBishop, huitema, ianswett, janaiyengar, kazuho, larseggert, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257 [-transport] [call-issued] [design] [ietf-lc] 

  9 issues closed:
  - IANA review of -transport; overall correctness https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4380 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - Clarify header protection sampling  https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc] 
  - Pakcet loss problem in Quic https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4433 
  - IANA review of -transport; question 1 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4376 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - Path Challenge Padding and Amplification Protection https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - Idempotency and replay https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4393 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - No IANA version registry https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4280 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - Reserve fewer codepoints for greasing https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4387 [-http] [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 
  - IANA review of -transport; question 4 https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4379 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready] 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+12/-5/💬17)
  12 issues created:
  - In prose, it is "connection ID" (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/152 
  - Connection ID linkability is missing a premise (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/151 
  - Delete QoS and ECMP (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149 
  - Should DDoS section talk about Retry Services? (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/148 
  - DDoS guidance is inaccurate about QUIC-LB (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/147 
  - Add Considerations for NAT (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/146 
  - Ask people not to drop new versions? (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/145 
  - Does the length self-encoding scheme actually work? (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/144 
  - Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/143 
  - Integrity Protection is not quite right (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/142 
  - Double check security considerations sections (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/141 [-applicability] [-manageability] [final check] 
  - Rewrite QoS and ECMP section to actually talk about DSCP (by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/140 

  9 issues received 17 new comments:
  - #149 Delete QoS and ECMP (2 by martinduke, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149 
  - #148 Should DDoS section talk about Retry Services? (3 by martinduke, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/148 
  - #147 DDoS guidance is inaccurate about QUIC-LB (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/147 
  - #146 Add Considerations for NAT (1 by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/146 
  - #145 Ask people not to drop new versions? (2 by martinthomson, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/145 
  - #143 Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? (4 by ianswett, martinduke, martinthomson, nibanks)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/143 
  - #142 Integrity Protection is not quite right (2 by martinduke, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/142 
  - #139 Normative language in applicability statement (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/139 
  - #131 QoS support and ECMP section (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/131 

  5 issues closed:
  - Delete QoS and ECMP https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149 
  - Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/143 
  - QoS support and ECMP section https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/131 
  - Normative language in applicability statement https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/139 
  - Double check use of normative language https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/85 [-applicability] [-manageability] [final check] 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-4/💬4)
  2 issues created:
  - PCID without SID configuration? (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/64 
  - Add Acknowledgments (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62 

  4 issues received 4 new comments:
  - #62 Add Acknowledgments (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62 
  - #16 Giving the client more information (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/16 [needs-discussion] 
  - #12 Configuration ID might be too small (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/12 [needs-discussion] 
  - #8 Unguessable connection IDs (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/8 [needs-discussion] 

  4 issues closed:
  - Add Acknowledgments https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62 
  - Configuration ID might be too small https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/12 [needs-discussion] 
  - Unguessable connection IDs https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/8 [needs-discussion] 
  - Giving the client more information https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/16 [needs-discussion] 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+3/-5/💬8)
  3 pull requests submitted:
  - Define pseudo-code of header protection using packet number offset (by kazuho)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4436 
  - Add 'time' to latest_in_flight_lost (by ianswett)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4434 
  - Final salt and retry keys (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4431 [-tls] [design] 

  2 pull requests received 8 new comments:
  - #4434 Add 'time' to latest_in_flight_lost (7 by ianswett, janaiyengar, larseggert, martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4434 
  - #4431 Final salt and retry keys (1 by ghedo)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4431 [-tls] [design] 

  5 pull requests merged:
  - Apply the 3x amplification-limit to migration too
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4264 [-transport] [design] 
  - Idempotent is not the standard for 0-RTT
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4394 [-tls] [design] 
  - Add Versions registry
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4345 [-transport] [design] 
  - Don't DoS the IANA registry server
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4428 [-http] [-transport] 
  - handling of KeyUpdate in other epochs are specified in RFC 8446, do not override
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4412 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+2/-2/💬2)
  2 pull requests submitted:
  - More applicability edits (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/153 
  - Editorial Pass on quic-manageability (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/150 

  2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
  - #150 Editorial Pass on quic-manageability (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/150 
  - #134 Remove QOS support and ECMP (1 by britram)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/134 

  2 pull requests merged:
  - Remove normative language from the drafts
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/132 
  - Edits, first batch
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/135 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/💬10)
  1 pull requests submitted:
  - Paragraph on SNI routing (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/63 

  4 pull requests received 10 new comments:
  - #61 Add ECMP CID algorithm (2 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/61 
  - #59 Aead retry token (6 by huitema, martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/59 
  - #58 Added transport parameter (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/58 
  - #37 One more config rotation bit. (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/37 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation

Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot