From nobody Sat Dec 12 23:38:35 2020 Return-Path: X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C033A158B for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:38:32 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -0.197 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.197 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=S4pv+7QZ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=iU+Af7Gx Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wViFE2lyu9OT for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DCA43A158A for ; Sat, 12 Dec 2020 23:38:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C26B5C00A7 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 02:38:28 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 13 Dec 2020 02:38:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=IoSPN6285u1RKKC2RGM7Zt0Xq/WYEr1bLZ6//ZWmzxg=; b=S4pv+7QZ l7Jx/9S9KypQ7aatD/f+q0zAF5fDWuDkhtkfYUrwylA7bDBbt3+ak+dtGsd7d6RH SiB109uHGp3OT8zvLMYJEiSgDg2C2miT4cuZWM4YFPrkZt6Ei9z8nDE553hVBe8H XO+dEozppCWavNwsJVUUb6PTEVL0g3QT0QAMH+7MWryJTKh2u+XypaFzSwrPHSWt PtSZvZqy8hnobZW50Zr9bFtjNuvo1Wyi5Ggcban1X4GigGnRqy4+49eyh1hmsRsz KZ6DjT6sbX0Rjf5Xq6lILyvNBrTqgqDNfuh47NVOwDquXZtg5qF93cdxaHrbJB/D /Wd5ow+ENo/Cxw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=IoSPN6285u1RKKC2RGM7Zt0Xq/WYE r1bLZ6//ZWmzxg=; b=iU+Af7Gx9/rEiWLlMVn+s4UvbZA3p7TFdNme5y1yQCae+ wd+oJAeSB0GPkTjAZBk7PvLpSrqnwQTJkj5yiGPbNsoMy43p5JSGcidYkwvRh4Ho 0kiBXV/umgRB1uF6yVUyaXmmgYI9/LUV6+PBxW2NUiyWcjlRZADoZbO2mHN14jzL uTmkfchCmuJBLjPN4Rvo1NoXRVFVRUE48kwrtq4SK3rF3+VCgfJA2P2OwAR9QrV9 AMtO4VK9DMB3QcCm4UGaTEHP5N5TeTgEk4El2ZEZZSG5GWwYOoIDdbHxQduBvSTo XfL0Ch92Fd6VomhI024MR7yD+CROt4BoAuKTJmpiw== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudekhedgudduudcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppedufedrjeejrdekuddrud eileenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from fv-az184-911.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [13.77.81.169]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3F3EC240057 for ; Sun, 13 Dec 2020 02:38:28 -0500 (EST) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0864401082787303364==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Repository Activity Summary Bot To: quic@ietf.org Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Message-Id: <20201213073828.3F3EC240057@mailuser.nyi.internal> Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 02:38:28 -0500 (EST) Archived-At: X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2020 07:38:33 -0000 --===============0864401082787303364== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Events without label "editorial" Issues ------ * quicwg/base-drafts (+2/-9/=F0=9F=92=AC41) 2 issues created: - Clarify header protection sampling (by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc]=20 - Pakcet loss problem in Quic (by LyraWang) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4433=20 11 issues received 41 new comments: - #4435 Clarify header protection sampling (7 by PaulDance, janaiyengar,= kazuho, larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc]=20 - #4433 Pakcet loss problem in Quic (7 by LyraWang, larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4433=20 - #4393 Idempotency and replay (1 by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4393 [-tls] [design] [ietf= -lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - #4380 IANA review of -transport; overall correctness (5 by gloinul, lar= seggert, martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4380 [-transport] [ietf-lc= ] [proposal-ready]=20 - #4379 IANA review of -transport; question 4 (1 by janaiyengar) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4379 [-transport] [ietf-lc= ] [proposal-ready]=20 - #4378 IANA review of -transport; question 3 (1 by larseggert) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4378 [-transport] [design]= [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - #4376 IANA review of -transport; question 1 (3 by LPardue, gloinul) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4376 [-transport] [ietf-lc= ] [proposal-ready]=20 - #4369 IANA review of -tls (4 by DavidSchinazi, martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4369 [-tls] [design] [ietf= -lc]=20 - #4336 Error code for illegal field composition (1 by LPardue) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4336 [-http] [design] [iet= f-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - #4280 No IANA version registry (2 by LPardue, gloinul) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4280 [-transport] [design]= [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - #4257 Path Challenge Padding and Amplification Protection (9 by DavidSc= hinazi, MikeBishop, huitema, ianswett, janaiyengar, kazuho, larseggert, mar= tinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257 [-transport] [call-is= sued] [design] [ietf-lc]=20 9 issues closed: - IANA review of -transport; overall correctness https://github.com/quicw= g/base-drafts/issues/4380 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - Clarify header protection sampling https://github.com/quicwg/base-draf= ts/issues/4435 [-tls] [ietf-lc]=20 - Pakcet loss problem in Quic https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issue= s/4433=20 - IANA review of -transport; question 1 https://github.com/quicwg/base-dr= afts/issues/4376 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - Path Challenge Padding and Amplification Protection https://github.com/= quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4257 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-re= ady]=20 - Idempotency and replay https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/439= 3 [-tls] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - No IANA version registry https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4= 280 [-transport] [design] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - Reserve fewer codepoints for greasing https://github.com/quicwg/base-dr= afts/issues/4387 [-http] [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 - IANA review of -transport; question 4 https://github.com/quicwg/base-dr= afts/issues/4379 [-transport] [ietf-lc] [proposal-ready]=20 * quicwg/ops-drafts (+12/-5/=F0=9F=92=AC17) 12 issues created: - In prose, it is "connection ID" (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/152=20 - Connection ID linkability is missing a premise (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/151=20 - Delete QoS and ECMP (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149=20 - Should DDoS section talk about Retry Services? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/148=20 - DDoS guidance is inaccurate about QUIC-LB (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/147=20 - Add Considerations for NAT (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/146=20 - Ask people not to drop new versions? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/145=20 - Does the length self-encoding scheme actually work? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/144=20 - Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/143=20 - Integrity Protection is not quite right (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/142=20 - Double check security considerations sections (by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/141 [-applicability] [-mana= geability] [final check]=20 - Rewrite QoS and ECMP section to actually talk about DSCP (by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/140=20 9 issues received 17 new comments: - #149 Delete QoS and ECMP (2 by martinduke, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149=20 - #148 Should DDoS section talk about Retry Services? (3 by martinduke, m= irjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/148=20 - #147 DDoS guidance is inaccurate about QUIC-LB (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/147=20 - #146 Add Considerations for NAT (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/146=20 - #145 Ask people not to drop new versions? (2 by martinthomson, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/145=20 - #143 Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? (4 by ianswett, martinduke= , martinthomson, nibanks) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/143=20 - #142 Integrity Protection is not quite right (2 by martinduke, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/142=20 - #139 Normative language in applicability statement (1 by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/139=20 - #131 QoS support and ECMP section (1 by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/131=20 5 issues closed: - Delete QoS and ECMP https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/149=20 - Do clients really use zero-length CIDs? https://github.com/quicwg/ops-d= rafts/issues/143=20 - QoS support and ECMP section https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issue= s/131=20 - Normative language in applicability statement https://github.com/quicwg= /ops-drafts/issues/139=20 - Double check use of normative language https://github.com/quicwg/ops-dr= afts/issues/85 [-applicability] [-manageability] [final check]=20 * quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-4/=F0=9F=92=AC4) 2 issues created: - PCID without SID configuration? (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/64=20 - Add Acknowledgments (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62=20 4 issues received 4 new comments: - #62 Add Acknowledgments (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62=20 - #16 Giving the client more information (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/16 [needs-discussion]=20 - #12 Configuration ID might be too small (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/12 [needs-discussion]=20 - #8 Unguessable connection IDs (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/8 [needs-discussion]=20 4 issues closed: - Add Acknowledgments https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/62 = - Configuration ID might be too small https://github.com/quicwg/load-bala= ncers/issues/12 [needs-discussion]=20 - Unguessable connection IDs https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/iss= ues/8 [needs-discussion]=20 - Giving the client more information https://github.com/quicwg/load-balan= cers/issues/16 [needs-discussion]=20 Pull requests ------------- * quicwg/base-drafts (+3/-5/=F0=9F=92=AC8) 3 pull requests submitted: - Define pseudo-code of header protection using packet number offset (by = kazuho) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4436=20 - Add 'time' to latest_in_flight_lost (by ianswett) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4434=20 - Final salt and retry keys (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4431 [-tls] [design]=20 2 pull requests received 8 new comments: - #4434 Add 'time' to latest_in_flight_lost (7 by ianswett, janaiyengar, = larseggert, martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4434=20 - #4431 Final salt and retry keys (1 by ghedo) https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4431 [-tls] [design]=20 5 pull requests merged: - Apply the 3x amplification-limit to migration too https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4264 [-transport] [design]=20 - Idempotent is not the standard for 0-RTT https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4394 [-tls] [design]=20 - Add Versions registry https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4345 [-transport] [design]=20 - Don't DoS the IANA registry server https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4428 [-http] [-transport]=20 - handling of KeyUpdate in other epochs are specified in RFC 8446, do not= override https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4412=20 * quicwg/ops-drafts (+2/-2/=F0=9F=92=AC2) 2 pull requests submitted: - More applicability edits (by martinthomson) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/153=20 - Editorial Pass on quic-manageability (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/150=20 2 pull requests received 2 new comments: - #150 Editorial Pass on quic-manageability (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/150=20 - #134 Remove QOS support and ECMP (1 by britram) https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/134=20 2 pull requests merged: - Remove normative language from the drafts https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/132=20 - Edits, first batch https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/pull/135=20 * quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC10) 1 pull requests submitted: - Paragraph on SNI routing (by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/63=20 4 pull requests received 10 new comments: - #61 Add ECMP CID algorithm (2 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/61=20 - #59 Aead retry token (6 by huitema, martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/59=20 - #58 Added transport parameter (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/58=20 - #37 One more config rotation bit. (1 by martinduke) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/37=20 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/datagram * https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers * https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation --===============0864401082787303364== Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Sunday December 13, 2020

Events without label "editorial"

Issues

quicwg/base-drafts (+2/-9/=F0=9F=92=AC41)

2 issues created:

11 issues received 41 new comments:

9 issues closed:

quicwg/ops-drafts (+12/-5/=F0=9F=92=AC17)

12 issues created:

9 issues received 17 new comments:

5 issues closed:

quicwg/load-balancers (+2/-4/=F0=9F=92=AC4)

2 issues created:

4 issues received 4 new comments:

4 issues closed:

Pull requests

quicwg/base-drafts (+3/-5/=F0=9F=92=AC8)

3 pull requests submitted:

2 pull requests received 8 new comments:

5 pull requests merged:

quicwg/ops-drafts (+2/-2/=F0=9F=92=AC2)

2 pull requests submitted:

2 pull requests received 2 new comments:

2 pull requests merged:

quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/=F0=9F=92=AC10)

1 pull requests submitted:

4 pull requests received 10 new comments:

Repositories tracked by this digest:

--===============0864401082787303364==--