Re: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues (again)

Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Mon, 26 August 2019 07:06 UTC

Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E90BC120829 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=hO9+TYwJ; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=qxNh14aP
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E6tjiY5r6-CA for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout3-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83D54120827 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 00:06:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F2833E; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 03:06:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 03:06:24 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; s=fm3; bh=f 0eizRNiMEKC+ZnihDPyNq1fKg80HU6wYQvKDr7JbzE=; b=hO9+TYwJ2Jy/e5eXB xa/jqML1jAlT4CTssBvFDooHcNbaM7alEcXUmwUWkwx8arpC9s9nN9AUR6xovOs7 TvWTcpI2Ju0020rkJNzCfYa+LfE/l+yKRUcjjAXVwXNM2Ew5NQq7v9jS8+Zk0nUH tDJeMg99CO2WaahORdl/mL7FgWOUtMYZ2a5I0kICH1Y+VAnl6UzwkPtQ5d40Lyf3 Hywc2OQBkjRmt/FwGOjzu5OM+G4KB02Ft08Oa87/GAnYudSLeOPo5+VWYw54W1BG NAr+/Fa36lyC1914W8h+r8yVvUQN7wlUTwK6vCwkIYi78XPSJKk2AGPaxukjlyHP BnvZw==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=f0eizRNiMEKC+ZnihDPyNq1fKg80HU6wYQvKDr7Jb zE=; b=qxNh14aPhYiW4dbjEtH7bCDG8l5rPQQMg2bxoMSVjiYg2ISIN7faC3SbT R8EjR5y3o1YUzs5bSBHPlX7TOJ3Lcnbs9hx4S4M4WTHXRmaoz+OP83RZ8Yrtqn0K k09DRbuL70jf1TlfxC0C+2r6zNc+JQopi54QBaspHI9BtOxfzhdouPVM9MCxsFhU 50HBqyaCvXPm9tWq76TtQH3TBXIcb+MlXHq46Bn9wEA37IeIjUB8Y9ZcNvG+PC5J kmLYvcejPOT6wE/rSORiODKm9qnfhORF6a+BoIAnv3KYsBEIAYZN0g4kIEsMj+gy P7JIKL3WbENy0Mhlr+4C/q5SKGhlw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:74RjXRZ5RbY7uQUzjs1iJPXeFB28-5FyusCX2mhq8M7xrX7b5A7UZA>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrudehfedguddujecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpegtggfuhfgjfffgkfhfvffosehtqhhmtdhhtddvnecuhfhrohhmpeforghr khcupfhothhtihhnghhhrghmuceomhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuffhomhgrih hnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpmhhnohhtrdhnvghtnecukfhppedugeegrddufeeirddu jeehrddvkeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepmhhnohhtsehmnhhothdrnhgvth enucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:74RjXXuAz9ubgWWK7oUtAYMgBKmHVpDIdh56fbakYyG17SOF0-a8ew> <xmx:74RjXa7wdFSP_BxU4W09thftFCAHbbFP_e7EWFyUwSbPzburc6CXvg> <xmx:74RjXa-TE-quAvWx6rvCFOIYL3RhSRPXyj87xJaO4HpecB0NhW7KFg> <xmx:8IRjXfCqPltOHBD0qf1A-yu2s1LNtGUi3l83mImQ7XipUV7lLBnH1A>
Received: from macbook-pro.mnot.net (unknown [144.136.175.28]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3D4D3D60057; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 03:06:21 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: Consensus Calls on Recent Transport/TLS Issues (again)
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <8EDCB64E-68BC-4D3C-83CD-7455B3155E88@mnot.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 17:06:18 +1000
Cc: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3F6294F5-3AD0-4238-9E95-EE383E939E94@mnot.net>
References: <8EDCB64E-68BC-4D3C-83CD-7455B3155E88@mnot.net>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/DQBEHApchSZ99p0P5A8igO8nj0U>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 07:06:28 -0000

Hearing no pushback, consensus declared.


> On 16 Aug 2019, at 2:18 pm, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> 
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate them next week.
> 
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
> 
> * #2869: Stateless Reset packet sizes should not depend on the maximum connection ID length
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2927>
> 
> * #2834: Long Header Packets and Routing Connection IDs
>   The proposal is to close with no action.
> 
> * #2770: If you want a Stateless Reset you need to send a larger packet than before
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2927>
> 
> * #2656: Discarding connection state at server on unvalidated client
>   The proposal is to make this an editorial issue.
> 
> * #2541: Clients cannot abandon Initial packets while server can still send initial close
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2688>
> 
> * #2534: ECN text disables ECN too aggressively
>  The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2752>
> 
> * #2205: Largest acked in ACK frame MUST NOT decrease
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2752>
> 
> * #2151: Where can you send CONNECTION_CLOSE
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2688>
> 
> * #2084: Discuss requirement that connection IDs not be correlatable
>   The proposal is: <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/2929>
> 
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
> 

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/