Re: Spin bit discussion - where we're at

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 22 November 2017 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7360129439 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 04:35:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hhPwEZEPnS7q for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 04:35:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx143.netapp.com (mx143.netapp.com [IPv6:2620:10a:4005:8000:2306::c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DCB3129438 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 04:35:26 -0800 (PST)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,436,1505804400"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="229339924"
Received: from hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.122.105.36]) by mx143-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2017 04:35:25 -0800
Received: from VMWEXCCAS01-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.11) by hioexcmbx03-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 04:35:24 -0800
Received: from NAM03-BY2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (10.120.60.153) by VMWEXCCAS01-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.122.105.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1320.4 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 04:35:25 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netapp.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-netapp-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=w2CMJeMU1XmDle7oVqDoCrGp7pZruVLL/idzuxwZA5U=; b=dfqIduQiu+yp2apDY/X/q5cs6ha53ksoNyR2sDCLRsi/VOgqXCK630WHqVmaZDUYqVzM+BIlKDLisO3GN+oP8WE8+ASF690pI7EE7YS49JRbhBI9QSGD/+n8V3i1iTJtt63n9iPCyOlhxeEeiU1BSxqfdhe+aon7YnrK/XWag7M=
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.260.4; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:35:24 +0000
Received: from BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) by BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.150]) with mapi id 15.20.0260.004; Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:35:23 +0000
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>
CC: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Spin bit discussion - where we're at
Thread-Topic: Spin bit discussion - where we're at
Thread-Index: AQHTY2jqp1VdukIM2U+G9HAjuBI8daMgHeUAgAAyYACAAAWjAA==
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:35:23 +0000
Message-ID: <ACB9B7B7-CEAD-48E8-B8CC-0FE4F660DC79@netapp.com>
References: <AFEE7BBA-E5DC-4064-AA19-33921EAF4C01@mnot.net> <21B07D8C-C4A1-4321-9E43-61C9DB9DC4CA@trammell.ch> <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD846139@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD846139@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=lars@netapp.com;
x-originating-ip: [217.70.211.15]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR06MB1764; 6:eoqUm0HixP2e1eKW7u/56WIPSrlI/n/S0bn0JauzbirtRkEQrvdGN8jw5rWxTXtf+TC0ZZytlacn839t8jcqt56RBMwTqAcbsHdgX7C/tnZGlUfgnCDz+P0mD7Et0Nz9FQVElesLV4fBmZ6GJPocPvJtbkzaMdTZkoeVS9nz+zkhuwq4E2XXQgBevrlZOV8L3CAXErIoB/xyZ5CSNDTruy6tQj6VRkr4UAQEc7DEqSmbtAb2qqNDssI5cbKdvgdHh5ujLjsZKmiixSV7d9nVbwjqecrQ0r5g/la0gKqTzK8X79L4elK2rT+hYXDvd3UUR75OnMlC/d19ircprXzfwTubf2fhhxaUFya3aG/xnP4=; 5:I0BqW8A6XiUtObtij8YoyNE7xrSwKS9O80cGgIPqtXitxE37B7azmgg42kh4vB/xelBIs9l+44/r6WfLN18skgvaRb8+XXY+tN5iJlvG5nQb5ttscvqwX9YxsXGklVMaY7ok2zW20IVZiWlRxytiCl/57y+jY8cx6hKVLJjBLo8=; 24:GiXA7MwFd+T4y5oBbWp9QNMkP2kZXCv9PF05wZsXy3Htd99gxNz7jqUkJG7+PxxgajQcnhcIbIOQTI7L7o00RGUHHbhpOKfaFbEv8Mq1BUQ=; 7:E+TF4ZSb7XZI9ab1N+vBloqZPyWKvg6Yjq6f4fO6QsoPSVCCAW+NgnR/3ggePkEG8YrEaxtr5f/dHAIjFQnjrdEEoEooz7eAdAckFin827XXxYFrSwwVk/PlOK9K4aVNYkkkABMSEDgIm9NHSHCYi5q7EBq7UAJbmmfs7wYArov7CwwcPp+G8OktrcDKF597i8TrW9Rcio/Vbf61kJUyVS/bJ/2HMJY8uqoJ2QLrXn7IW2DNd+NBQijN9XXTFi5E
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c4f9ec3d-8f2c-489a-bf8f-08d531a58097
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(5600022)(4604075)(4534020)(4602075)(4627115)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603258)(49563074); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BLUPR06MB1764:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR06MB1764EC6AA860C587FBF48661A7200@BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(50582790962513)(100405760836317);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(102415395)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(100000703101)(100105400095)(3231022)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123555025)(20161123564025)(20161123560025)(20161123562025)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558100)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764;
x-forefront-prvs: 0499DAF22A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(376002)(346002)(199003)(377424004)(24454002)(189002)(3280700002)(99936001)(6506006)(229853002)(478600001)(2906002)(99286004)(68736007)(33656002)(4001150100001)(6916009)(2950100002)(8936002)(50986999)(966005)(6436002)(6486002)(77096006)(76176999)(25786009)(3846002)(83716003)(102836003)(6116002)(53936002)(305945005)(316002)(106356001)(6246003)(8676002)(7736002)(50226002)(4326008)(86362001)(3660700001)(66066001)(82746002)(6306002)(36756003)(54906003)(97736004)(2900100001)(53546010)(189998001)(81166006)(6512007)(561944003)(5660300001)(14454004)(57306001)(101416001)(105586002)(81156014); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR06MB1764; H:BLUPR06MB1764.namprd06.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: netapp.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_223976A5-7A66-43F9-9F47-6C90D88D995E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: c4f9ec3d-8f2c-489a-bf8f-08d531a58097
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 22 Nov 2017 12:35:23.8805 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 4b0911a0-929b-4715-944b-c03745165b3a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR06MB1764
X-OriginatorOrg: netapp.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/DjJFFlRsvh04myB9hGjFsER71Pg>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 12:35:28 -0000

Hi Roni,

On 2017-11-22, at 13:15, Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com> wrote:
> I was surprised to read the chairs email and agree with Brian's comments.
> My impression is that the email reflects a view that manageability is not important (and not blocking) and this is the reason for not doing the spin bit based on issue 609 as a PR.

there hasn't been a consensus call on the Spin Bit proposal. Contributors have expressed their views on the results presented by the DT on the list, as requested by the chairs in the session in Singapore. But that is not the same as a consensus call, and I apologize if it was misunderstood as one.

In order to hold an informed consensus call on the Spin Bit in the future, we're asking for a more comprehensive writeup (as detailed in the original email.) As I've said before, I think the material for that already exists in some form or other, but it's currently in several places, not all of which may be public (e.g., the DT mailing list.)

For *other* proposals that intend to address manageability by adding information to the cleartext wire image, we're asking for a similarly comprehensive description, so that the WG can begin discussing a concrete contribution.

> My product development experience is that lack of tools to manage and maintain a product will prevent its distribution. I understand that the developer  of the protocol care only about the protocol and not about making it easy to support in the field. Yet the network product manufacturers and the service providers gave a clear message that RTT  is crucial for deployment.  I provided use cases from TCP in service providers networks in https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-even-quic-troubleshooting-video-delivery-00.txt
> I expect that the WG chair and AD will treat protocol maintenance and management the same as the protocol itself. What emphasis my point is the effort the WG does on https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-quic-manageability-01

Lars