IETF Logo Mail Archive

Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 10 October 2021 07:38 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 504CC3A07EF for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.1
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=wYlt4yL0; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=PV+36Hau
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MgacknkBz8ym for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBAB03A07E6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0D15C00C4 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 03:38:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Oct 2021 03:38:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject; s=fm3; bh=HUw8vP4cdY4 f3ZXsMrv7H+VBPOhRcfDpfbENFjBHPZE=; b=wYlt4yL0Ieni+1vCQgs4cmU2kLF wgHltwg+PHlqh51Fet/ixyiJTY4wGl/dh5PFK13KXFelTRvUW5NILitUxLEOpRQQ 7XERl8H9l6n6PXXYiCZRyLIsWFlfdhXDP8irEpEEZqCOVgTu5jHlg8cgoV1Lue8B HQhIVdkeCWIzHz9s5rqdCumwljsltbeErNnW/qfXOC7mU0tMgN2/ZuFIlRmW24Hu nq3h9XQyLNLI1BcRU+5VsxOetLCFMtdD+UNjU4NdKvES5qKLTPCuTHmOs0kfz6ey sECkOgy1M0CIImbrjeNEHh+Oi1LbQmEh8RslKHDLl3hGk0jhebslJRIeOWQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:from:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=HUw8vP4cdY4f3ZXsMrv7H+VBPOhRcfDpfbENFjBHPZE=; b=PV+36Hau bAD+hofcwhWiTtMrrux6wxilql5GXb5lR+89jHu7Mwz+Sh8m9FkVOxPjQQoqwDuE D6MrPs8HY8FrWjKOWHEOvnBavMVCsC6qQeBG8y+VVZL4DHxAm5cHhvZx5vMgt6Hx ah/DV449ZcuiwuihiJedYwG9py4qMn1lGrcOXZ2KkLDmiLQrHjdiNtOemDxLwfLb jxki+PsqXbJmJVzl793mfKUkNHgW8lBjNhfvO8WCL6DIjtJULTcDrX8PBwaegnlg BuoZfFsE2icM1JvLfTdEpLbJAfXvjPM89pAtHKstPQvAZ9wiATfV37shcv1UTfEZ A7ChEolO4jVLRQ==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:e5hiYdahcKvBhZLGk4fkKFd30Zv3B4kEmRbGc_myeHEO54ng356NgA> <xme:e5hiYUZImT1YO1QbcTPGsh7i4wnlGygEMYifUwyGChokiNB1dYTYUCSDfy2X2f3aJ GpVAxwVbJutn7OJPw>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:e5hiYf8BGz3sTvVSNIQwFjNSFetMm9VALTsDzvR95JY3CeAdGQfwXN-pXCz50oJDP1HCYqsCJ56CDqv2SSgDD_3HFXL098bxmSKfszRCSiX1FUjNOuLFI3BzfGKB_qvvIKOeJg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvddtfedguddulecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:e5hiYbpfQoYEce-TtWrUb8l_iJYQWxjwPDw3qu6xD7TFpp2er0mb-w> <xmx:e5hiYYqi_5Pvsy4s7ks5zJjNddN6OZouJ3gAQEuRzWsBpCip1EvYTw> <xmx:e5hiYRTN_rPUDOCnMsrT-gGpNmnoDV9PCEe7go5LRJoXVwHscx91AA> <xmx:e5hiYf22pMqeTiegSvcI0XSsQ9kO0ojphmk8eFIAzGV1ZbRWOEV54w>
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Oct 2021 03:38:35 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============5821387008132856641=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20211010073836.CBAB03A07E6@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 00:38:36 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/E6ST5w_zzOq-friIcUtqkhohXe0>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2021 07:38:42 -0000



Events without label "editorial"

Issues
------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+0/-0/💬1)
  1 issues received 1 new comments:
  - #4939 CONNECT might be under-specified (1 by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/4939 [-http] 

* quicwg/ops-drafts (+0/-0/💬5)
  1 issues received 5 new comments:
  - #399 Caution that there are other protocols that amplify in packets and bytes (5 by LPardue, ianswett, mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts/issues/399 

* quicwg/datagram (+4/-2/💬12)
  4 issues created:
  - What happens if an application wants to send a too large datagram? (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/64 
  - Clarify 0-RTT handling (by mirjak)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/63 
  - Why do IANA considerations duplicate information from the body? (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/61 
  - State clearly the IANA registration type of TP and frame type (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/59 

  4 issues received 12 new comments:
  - #64 What happens if an application wants to send a too large datagram? (6 by LPardue, MikeBishop, mirjak, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/64 
  - #63 Clarify 0-RTT handling (4 by DavidSchinazi, mirjak, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/63 
  - #61 Why do IANA considerations duplicate information from the body? (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/61 
  - #59 State clearly the IANA registration type of TP and frame type (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/59 

  2 issues closed:
  - Why do IANA considerations duplicate information from the body? https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/61 
  - State clearly the IANA registration type of TP and frame type https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/issues/59 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+3/-7/💬10)
  3 issues created:
  - Incoming Stateless Resets (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/140 
  - Get rid of Block Cipher CIDs (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/138 
  - Eliminate Dynamic Allocation (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/135 

  6 issues received 10 new comments:
  - #140 Incoming Stateless Resets (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/140 
  - #138 Get rid of Block Cipher CIDs (4 by huitema, kazuho, martinduke, tatsuhiro-t)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/138 
  - #135 Eliminate Dynamic Allocation (2 by ianswett, martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/135 
  - #130 "server use" length should be consistent (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/130 
  - #124 Server resource exhaustion attack with dynamic allocation (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/124 
  - #122 Retry Service SHOULD preserve server ID (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/122 

  7 issues closed:
  - Eliminate Dynamic Allocation https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/135 
  - Dynamic SIDs and High Availability https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/103 
  - "server use" length should be consistent https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/130 
  - Retry Service SHOULD preserve server ID https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/122 
  - Crypto Agility in Shared State Retry https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/118 
  - Server resource exhaustion attack with dynamic allocation https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/124 
  - Reduce load of Dynamic SID allocation https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/101 

* quicwg/qlog (+2/-0/💬2)
  2 issues created:
  - Figures contain lines that are too long (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/179 
  - support for DATAGRAMS in data_moved events (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/178 

  2 issues received 2 new comments:
  - #121 Allow the logging of Session Ticket contents and stored transport params/SETTINGS (1 by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/121 [design] [quic-http3-fields] [current-version] 
  - #27 0-RTT is a bit ambiguous in -01 (1 by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/issues/27 [design] [quic-http3-fields] [current-version] 



Pull requests
-------------
* quicwg/base-drafts (+2/-0/💬0)
  2 pull requests submitted:
  - Specify CONNECT error handling bidirectionally (by MikeBishop)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4941 [-http] 
  - Negative base values are invalid (by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/4940 

* quicwg/datagram (+2/-1/💬1)
  2 pull requests submitted:
  - rough in shepherd writeup (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/62 
  - Make IANA registrations permanent (by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/60 

  1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
  - #60 Make IANA registrations permanent (1 by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/60 

  1 pull requests merged:
  - Make IANA registrations permanent
    https://github.com/quicwg/datagram/pull/60 

* quicwg/load-balancers (+5/-5/💬1)
  5 pull requests submitted:
  - Try to diagram the Nonce length (by LPardue)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/141 
  - Kill dynamic (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/139 
  - fix oversight (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/137 
  - further algorithm simplification (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/136 
  - Crypto agility (by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/134 

  1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
  - #104 Smaller tables (1 by martinduke)
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/104 

  5 pull requests merged:
  - Kill dynamic
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/139 
  - further algorithm simplification
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/136 
  - fix oversight
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/137 
  - Crypto agility
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/134 
  - Smaller tables
    https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/pull/104 

* quicwg/qlog (+0/-1/💬0)
  1 pull requests merged:
  - Fix 0RTT and 1RTT definitions in PacketType
    https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/pull/177 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts
* https://github.com/quicwg/datagram
* https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers
* https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation
* https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease
* https://github.com/quicwg/qlog

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email