Re: HTTP/3 Nits

Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Fri, 16 October 2020 17:07 UTC

Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6ACC3A0FD4; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:07:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id y-qDIncTHduK; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:07:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x634.google.com (mail-ej1-x634.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::634]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A073A0FC3; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x634.google.com with SMTP id t25so4172334ejd.13; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:07:23 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bet0seEGzPY/iaMWZdyQKC1dGkBjRhmf695U5oLvufE=; b=Y9MQ8m6QUv36o4TzfO/bL5pGL/fYz2BwHzMCRzUvGA0D3Z9cJaUcS10mdT7qOGj6+K UNvRVI1yyPQNUKJMi6AYwzsVFijjMaoXlPx5Y7P7d/JANXG0Dz7ICosyCo0QBtcIEnwr SoKYlR5ah4jsXSNrRH43h0e4/1a949+KBoH8SWwZ2kJJebKay115k7fsOS6SzDipwGQz h5zGAT7tmTlXuGGOZv5uj9qEC0/H8ZKHIk0zPesXiTkkKkbtoeKp2yrTtmpahofeeNhw sjoNh0Fyx/ONlMFmEWzXJn5zOQWnb5WveTFOU7xjTEYn3ZvVs2Bllc2t4cn3uLd8LOd4 Cjdg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bet0seEGzPY/iaMWZdyQKC1dGkBjRhmf695U5oLvufE=; b=Ec7g6L8eB/I1Kydd/zPd8zws1TeNoukiyg63giKUd6WI6sQ/EZTDXtFcKpQrrTpQM3 09fRzdmoCiGG1+qSNt7a09D17cGvKEt0lo8DxaLdOxvaAcYGRoDeFj/MZbzFX9T7kVUi jO5/35KotLfsk/fZ64jZbhHohlZA6JgP/fKzYUjFORO6W4cGU/YgObcm5v+Hxdz74GeN ZsBTH+j3S591xodyRq6sp6TYdNAVcN79NW3A9mPOw3+0SJ8OvtpoNqz2fMKKevaHXcVp j5lU49brwiodPzO25/ZNfap+0gSOcdS/3HoqPoPcCRdBEIEsUjJPmDgKSZYDpmj1cSfJ Y+MQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530POW/e99Ksemh5R7odMnhKcZi113uUENMhoqBsOp1XxU8xJLzw brD7txfPPaTzUhIQXt3lwkwm0ifADnDziL/1am+q9gXxWIQgnA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJ4aORQYZJoLIA8tAgZj8kA3Fc3h0Nvo5S7Bj2vFAE3o0R8PHf2De4Y5noY5pnI/c9TPOnQPIW2fmr3NENpuw=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5249:: with SMTP id y9mr5025192ejm.440.1602868042161; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 10:07:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxRLivWuyJQ8=JeEn-XZq6WaYkw_WWxqMNBbprx6S=fU6Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxRLivWuyJQ8=JeEn-XZq6WaYkw_WWxqMNBbprx6S=fU6Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 18:07:10 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9oZ33NyLF9StLL=jb=ot-r4+5=Vh=oMhsbcG5N1bT=Yr2A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: HTTP/3 Nits
To: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000046625405b1cccc39"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/FDREXhUwtd0NoGObHDUmItXtKGw>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 17:07:26 -0000

Hi Martin

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 5:33 PM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> If 4.1.1.1 is accurate, then shouldn't there be a registry for HTTP/3 pseudoheaders? IIUC pseudoheader extensions are not possible in HTTP or HTTP/2, so this is an H3-specific registry.
>
>
>
HTTP/2 does allow pseudo-header extension. See RFC 8441 which defines the
:protocol pseudo-header[1] to allow WebSockets over H2.

We follow H2's example, maybe there was good reason not to have a registry
or maybe it was an oversight?

[1] - https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8441#section-5

Cheers,
Lucas


>