What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution?
Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Fri, 08 June 2018 15:39 UTC
Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9163130EFD for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 08:39:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lSOLvq3OORwy for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 08:39:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x234.google.com (mail-qt0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1BAE130EF8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jun 2018 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x234.google.com with SMTP id p23-v6so13846972qtn.6 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:39:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=0huvE4sNNvtzSQ4RYv+c/DCipYOmiATMkGGcyGzmkFI=; b=xFPdjJRxSritu0Tn9Qgs0m3ta5AlM/oWfcBPwyNo/tXHUmUTEnj3QUwadslOjn01x7 QWn7PN1pb2hV3YVbNAUT/jhgNxrCqSR9WH73AVO8xwEZS/GW752LaaemV0HaCZEM03bm ECyPFFswSa7q8pXeRjZPDoXBEXzxOKO6GJ6dDEtYw8E1RXGvVNSj6XxPKZijWyhDD/8E nyYrXiXEa5FUI8ziOPw00x5KZUz89gbRRbUwivdBLiQOYXRWcRXIc1t4gpqUuwMFgbYB W4M6cXwiu4VF6eNJ3CcAYu9fQIBCr+ZS2cll8lZuFsVttBHGVd366YvVuN9UsCHdRpj4 qYTQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to :mime-version:content-disposition:user-agent; bh=0huvE4sNNvtzSQ4RYv+c/DCipYOmiATMkGGcyGzmkFI=; b=LUHrLH9buXMhjiG61WK6+ZVImEAaagLqcokubTsvFjOpOtJAadIapPkRMY+wemF1Kn TvYawjxhgYIUdOogg/O/imd9y+9oWddvNmzsMaMwQWIHEaHXsNRuSHz/0/v73wSRItK/ VBNeZh0MxIk04Qgkzdv8aMH0dLHgsdeYuhE1uqf3/KZbB8bq7YqhEkoQTqPk7WSSssIb Kb5ONeVoKZjwxnpn7NlYQ6q1iRsgI8q1He3fku/SpSgzoeDUL4BrA+cJvtYPcyRIFR/6 kpsIUevm05DM+SWRgKC5kxRTaKVH/higxqT1itchoT8bxVoNh9ztOoBLvRvdVSDiB9tZ 5TIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E19XUFfx7t83eZI7y4wGvScgqVN78SCJQZnbCmt3Q5rFPoGuTgO G4/tkpMVokmx/zOQ6tU9b+84RM0V
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADUXVKJWRg56JkQA9kRunSBq7FfcCgYpTNVcF5zaFOXf77QXLldH3/0aoLJ/2zt3Y272XMTZKKTS+A==
X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2f2c:: with SMTP id j41-v6mr6372043qta.366.1528472360488; Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-2f1636b6.static.optonline.net. [47.22.54.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j7-v6sm37377214qth.35.2018.06.08.08.39.19 for <quic@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Jun 2018 08:39:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 11:39:18 -0400
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution?
Message-ID: <20180608153916.GC13418@ubuntu-dmitri>
Mail-Followup-To: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/H9KpoVEDEea5NVmM3ju3EJdKs4c>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2018 15:39:25 -0000
All, What was the WG resolution with regard to the QUIC Load Balancers proposal? I failed to grasp the outcome of the discussion and the minutes [1] do not have it. Thanks, - Dmitri. 1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-2aBorKh9WVE3jM5mBlYNliJH0Ef_gp3dJo0RBe9y4c/edit#heading=h.jlkx7yo7rr9h
- Re: What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution? Dmitri Tikhonov
- RE: What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution? Mike Bishop
- What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution? Dmitri Tikhonov
- Re: What was the QUIC Load Balancers resolution? Martin Duke