Re: Consensus Calls for Late Stage Documents

[Ian Swett <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for the call, all these resolutions look great to me, but I think
the PR is incorrect for the two Retry issues.

On Sun, Jan 5, 2020 at 10:57 PM Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Happy New Year, Working Group.
>
> The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far
> seems to support consensus to accept them. If you object, please do so on
> the issue or in response to this message (changing the Subject
> appropriately!). Absent any pushback, we'll direct the editors to
> incorporate them late next week.
>
> See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current
> state of issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at <
> https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.
>
> * #3274: Encrypting Retry token
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274>
>
I believe the proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120

>
> * #3247: I am concerned the congestion control text is too permissive.
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248>
>
> * #3245: Make RFC 6928 normative
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3287>
>
> * #3244: Can we make a normative ref to  RFC8085?
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3248>
>
> * #3243: Add caution when using IW10 and fragmentation
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3280>
>
> * #3152: Client storage of tokens should be independent of other stored
> state
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3150>
>
> * #3142: It is unspecified how a server sends Handshake packets during /
> after migration
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145>
>
> * #3094: congestion window increase on every ACKed packet could result in
> bursty sends
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3232>
>
> * #3014: Handling of corrupt Retry packets
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/issues/3274>
>
Also https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3120

>
> * #2863: unrecoverable loss pattern leads to deadlock
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3145>
>
> * #2789: Use a higher seed RTT for new paths
>    The proposal is to close with no action.
>
> * #2744: Idle Timer Can Fire Even with Outstanding Data to Send
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3266>
>
> * #2602: Idle timeout needs more description and a recommendation
>    The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3099>
>
>
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>
>