IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: More on demultiplexing

Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com> Wed, 06 December 2017 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06DA1127909 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:17:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v6AuG2Ckk2jm for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:17:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com (mail-it0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94F71127977 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:17:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id r6so8773737itr.3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:17:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=ZYshykN6WgvTl8p6LKgYhtWYwuohS7hmCGGb+ghV6EQ=; b=HefDSm6IfeY6T8f3fqt6k6EJV5U7hRIbO4W9zWkvRSWdRglkvGWiPFCmZjWZJfxquP YUtGTx31q2yDlITJb4/kR2I8hQ654N5aIz9HK8aJ/ZdzRaXrgD/MVB9yQ+RMWt7B8V2i H2I0Afv1m7Ur5BjMbPEFcb9VUPFgYDEBcGHBpA2L268cgUV3CUb4kBIYcywoCP2eFrxr hrie11V3wCF4v3J91BWJjTTDLxmrFyLB6zb3+aGC7ERJmArOfKb4zIxgrxs32kyM7nUO yFwx/hAPrrdH9VzvpNTbdLkd4b/YoQleimaV20Ty8EziYsBr24ykG67h7hptWzZpL9vU 0cRA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=ZYshykN6WgvTl8p6LKgYhtWYwuohS7hmCGGb+ghV6EQ=; b=D04V4h1+YrnatKMl/ktsXfubHWVYoboKU1bJ0J7TRYoSfivZYHdEqa044gw/kjeL3a yhIjmoUlXR3ZHYkI2rKZlUK43fc3HHdsGJRjM+h5s4lAAfGJ5IQsvDRWfBUs5w6JF3HL R7U34bN1Wc6TLbNHB6wwtju9GUuXpnjm/YJrFnBEspU5y91bsaEtKPicRt9h4tSXXGH3 r45GOea0Zg1iDjzeOXqt+e7d3nj9kLA5w0XcCQfgojSR/hCKIfHwYxgx49F8pqMjBTz8 363LhCbp7p374111NqUIJQsXPuWr0ZYsz+5zLIFTtCxwcM++g8mjwmWhBkdd59rbydeb zyvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7TGHRL5ZoR/bQ0jYPlx732sEdFswMAhkTINfxDPUpKlWWJdPii MW86DIpkLnLJDR4AJ9j9Fof6maycuehxySHDBMQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbA2cfC3iKCKj7hCer1u63Sqg5bf5SGcXmYyEhrXjxLg7zmft4jHVcwUhFuqi80F8JxFdTN0B5NZJZnVzBlcrI=
X-Received: by 10.107.3.86 with SMTP id 83mr36416876iod.297.1512587848916; Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:17:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 1058052472880 named unknown by gmailapi.google.com with HTTPREST; Wed, 6 Dec 2017 11:17:27 -0800
From: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABcZeBO=WCTLuuxaOJXKzQdiBduOxLdoqNtMpvPatBOAwNjZkQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBO=WCTLuuxaOJXKzQdiBduOxLdoqNtMpvPatBOAwNjZkQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Airmail (420)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 11:17:27 -0800
Message-ID: <CAN1APdeUpVf5HTg549O5nn4dhPre1hm=WShUi+_ZKGx8aG-Zbw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: More on demultiplexing
To: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a113eb83a6d21e0055fb0cdc9"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/IooAxDlg4qa3HTnNaHNbvG2COA4>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2017 19:17:31 -0000

On 6 December 2017 at 19.42.37, Eric Rescorla (ekr@rtfm.com) wrote:

I've been doing some thinking about the QUIC muxing story. It seems
like the case that everyone has in their head is WebRTC, so I'd like
to focus on that.

Well, the concern is probably that QUIC might not have a routable UDP port
otherwise, and WebRTC is likely available.

Another case could be port 53 for QUIC/DNS.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email