IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Rechartering QUIC for Post Version 1 Work

Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org> Mon, 01 February 2021 16:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@eggert.org>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677F33A12CD for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:46:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=eggert.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mE7DTB4KsL1L for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.eggert.org (mail.eggert.org [91.190.195.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC933A12C8 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 08:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:acf1:c447:f5f0:6aa9] (unknown [IPv6:2a00:ac00:4000:400:acf1:c447:f5f0:6aa9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.eggert.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E5CA600057; Mon, 1 Feb 2021 18:45:59 +0200 (EET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eggert.org; s=dkim; t=1612197959; bh=yDHpW5r2b8ZNCy6biCf/m1K6SGCYC3LmANV3DaUFDM8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References; b=SsJMTE5arZ8M0s5NWgK/VEkC6LckBVuyXzkp8IIos8WKix3uEJ4isYopZjU2sb4Wo Lg0tJf4Obh+RM5FDXwPYtC3K2LM3iVWxFvvUqayPDbPukYxGRQddhDLnvTUKLPWMrU c8wsOxDQ3IRPZBkRMTDtVK4hrwH4H1+nOUJMW8lE=
From: Lars Eggert <lars@eggert.org>
Message-Id: <CE6A409A-8850-438D-861F-EC30C4EB82C3@eggert.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EFDF058E-9F2C-4B2E-BC41-BCB7DB428EF2"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.40.0.2.32\))
Subject: Re: Rechartering QUIC for Post Version 1 Work
Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 18:45:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <78FF691A-EDBE-4FC8-8ECD-5D1AF05C5347@sn3rd.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
To: Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com>
References: <CALGR9oaXpZp87ujmkDAO6Tuy=m-s8qKDY9-azpm_PhVAMfkq9A@mail.gmail.com> <20210126170048.GB364092@okhta> <D01160E4-C89E-4DF5-B0A7-C5138E33D9C1@eggert.org> <20210126170932.GC364092@okhta> <CALGR9oaO8Q7TC9zyajM20gZkZPR1cRDSv-SeDqo0MfaQbgfAjg@mail.gmail.com> <20210126184815.GD364092@okhta> <CAKcm_gNXkCko=H3VofwnubMDctCN7Smx0LDbH-ruYcTk7S4kTg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPDSy+4kVyrvmkd8vDOzASV36Y2iR2HEGzrSkxXJaMmED6JDww@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAcc8E3G2r9tzggRgz5t8ZxeqpFu4dwg4bmoLH39DnBHV-Q@mail.gmail.com> <9D6FDFBB-77E1-4AB9-84C2-376690A026DC@eggert.org> <78FF691A-EDBE-4FC8-8ECD-5D1AF05C5347@sn3rd.com>
X-MailScanner-ID: 9E5CA600057.A2E1D
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lars@eggert.org
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/K6Ex1rgrIB_lE21PiHn9ktHYTiY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2021 16:46:10 -0000

Hi,

On 2021-2-1, at 17:58, Sean Turner <sean@sn3rd.com> wrote:
> 
> Maybe I am not reading this properly but the 1st area includes:
> 
>  Maintenance and evolution of the specifications
>  of QUIC extensions.
> 
> and the 3rd includes:
> 
>  The third area of work is the specification of
>  new extensions to QUIC.
> 
> Is the 1st about the extensions that we know about now and the 3rd is about ones we don’t know about yet?

that was the thinking. Do you think it makes more sense to merge the extensions stuff into one area?

Thanks,
Lars

v2.26.15 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status