Re: Draft: QUIC Throughput Testing

Tom Jones <> Wed, 22 September 2021 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B2613A13D4 for <>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 03:06:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e4FYXylTl48O for <>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 03:06:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF9C3A13C5 for <>; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 03:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AFB0F1B0022C; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:05:25 +0100 (BST)
Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal []) by mailauth.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C86527C005A; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:05:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:05:23 -0400
X-ME-Sender: <xms:4v9KYQru4yQMy9WnePYLfCim125l5vehyR-3SJouiOAZ1VDQEu_Gew> <xme:4v9KYWpyF-KN1TBS76uzQVCsu-QUIfGDM4C3jcutOooxy_KJrc9gIJUWjCkRuaKvP IiXzTa1xHmV9ykr1A>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:4v9KYVNL37HOG8jLZyfTCJOHpiQ-uZWjjvxgMwmpWpDbPt6NyjDqAbcqx2qVBDt-l7fy9rtd95tFc_SCNU6v5DLKvKfP-pXv3g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudeijedgvdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtugfgjgesthekredttddtudenucfhrhhomhepvfhomhcu lfhonhgvshcuoehtohhmsegvrhhgrdgrsggunhdrrggtrdhukheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepteffteelfeevfeeiieeufffgjeetvdeuhfehveefiefgueelffeiheeivdfgfeeu necuffhomhgrihhnpehivghtfhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurf grrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehsohhmvgdomhgvshhmthhprghuthhhphgvrhhsohhn rghlihhthidqgeehgeehtddujedtqdduheehgedvgeehkedqthhomheppegvrhhgrdgrsg gunhdrrggtrdhukhesfhgrshhtmhgrihhlrdgtohhm
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:4v9KYX4QJwlJI4ium0FPQ_ns5mm6HYsXJ4xdgqwm6NjIW4DfrH3F-A> <xmx:4v9KYf793rLesqxVAbNC3pvddY5G3CskjM8c1o11FGXgFnrSkgJelQ> <xmx:4v9KYXj1MmzgZyMTrQKXKQqbYwhiB2-pn64BQUVaFLx9RGKzbL00PA> <xmx:4v9KYchf3TXprGWXDE5k-T6BJs535WEsXnPFjd27GD_UQICi9ZCUMw>
Received: by (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 22 Sep 2021 06:05:21 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 11:09:25 +0100
From: Tom Jones <>
To: Kévin Corre <>
Cc: "" <>
Subject: Re: Draft: QUIC Throughput Testing
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <>
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 10:06:19 -0000

On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 09:15:58AM +0000, Kévin Corre wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Our team at EXFO is working on adapting the TCP Throughput Testing methodology described in RFC6349 to QUIC. We just published a draft that can be found at
> The draft follows the same organization as the RFC6349 and discuss what should be changed to support QUIC Throughput Testing.
> The methodology is interested in measuring the achievable QUIC throughput and efficiency of a managed network when the connection is at an equilibrium. Although, it could also be used for un-managed networks.
> We are particularly looking for comments on the way we use the protocol to measure the network's QUIC Throughput but also feedback from potential users of such a test.
> For instance, our draft closely follows the RFC6349 methodology, but since QUIC introduces new features, it would be interesting to gauge interest in extending the methodology to test features such as 0-RTT effect.
> Comments would be gladly appreciated, so let us know what you think.

Hi Kévin,

Have you seen draft-banks-quic-performance? I don't see a reference to
it in your document. This protocol has implementations using a number of
quic different libraries.

There is also a perf channel on the quic slack, please ask off list if
you require an invite.

- Tom