RE: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption

Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com> Tue, 01 May 2018 00:32 UTC

Return-Path: <pravb@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E6C612D965 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=microsoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q1XONWw9aynP for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from NAM01-SN1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam01on0119.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.32.119]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072CA12DA18 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Apr 2018 17:32:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=mLEgY69oc4JqGCkDvPmOmC+sxkFGKjiTiwaOUi1dqYY=; b=QdVRqWE1mKpPyoZUjFb1R+BaYhumvcLmdB9/t+Ph4Fnt6rf7PPOmusaM82VlPhPp1CDqzb/Gv4nRbMw0udw2YQ2o/v9vkyHnFyIovQOuOwhRBKk7Y1A4Ug2SEe1A6LRm5bsSWiMO9LtnDytBXvc6/mtJpqF9mzxJbPYzQ67T2Ww=
Received: from MWHPR21MB0638.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.175.141.139) by MWHPR21MB0797.namprd21.prod.outlook.com (10.175.135.151) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.735.4; Tue, 1 May 2018 00:32:18 +0000
Received: from MWHPR21MB0638.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d48:f7af:d267:2021]) by MWHPR21MB0638.namprd21.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::6d48:f7af:d267:2021%7]) with mapi id 15.20.0735.006; Tue, 1 May 2018 00:32:18 +0000
From: Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com>
To: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
CC: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>, huitema <huitema@huitema.net>, Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>, "Lubashev, Igor" <ilubashe@akamai.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>, Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>, "Deval, Manasi" <manasi.deval@intel.com>, Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption
Thread-Topic: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption
Thread-Index: AQHTy9GYaiUVNrU6h0aiyBQtEo3l9KPwZ0sAgAC4ugCAAARcAIAAFTbwgAALYgCAAAAgYIAAEcIAgACR+YCAB09lAIAFXyIAgAVK+oCAAJlSAIABxdSAgACOHICAB/EyAIACo7YAgACiMICAAADPgIAAIs8AgAAm/YCAABExgIAABpMAgAAK5wCAAPIgAIAA5wcAgACzcYCAAHHMgIAEe1cAgAABEACAABL8QIAAIkOAgAAINfA=
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 00:32:18 +0000
Message-ID: <MWHPR21MB0638343B80FE5342860ADD4CB6810@MWHPR21MB0638.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
References: <7fd34142-2e14-e383-1f65-bc3ca657576c@huitema.net> <ae7a63fe-0a32-893f-aa6b-e8d97b8ba87a@huitema.net> <1F436ED13A22A246A59CA374CBC543998B60C6DD@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <SN1PR08MB1854FD2461597D81BEE31ED6DA8F0@SN1PR08MB1854.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAKcm_gMRPXgCoZ958Oj4_Pnkvmc9a7PgNVS0iae0hCW7bLKqng@mail.gmail.com> <SN1PR08MB18545D0554DED1F83862EBFBDA8F0@SN1PR08MB1854.namprd08.prod.outlook.com> <CAKcm_gNMTQg-pV8vTXkMCTh48QPZ_ujyFSEKRYf+WurUFytaWw@mail.gmail.com> <CANatvzwCYrOZULG3iVmDFp97nr=M5=Gufo8TZjOGQVFUpsn0bQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxqDcPXJUE83KVnDiU23PvqDcTCrc6rRMw09FexjJA-Y6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CANatvzwjYE6EdvFtOXJMVQnutbVQ4YY+=XsQFzKwHzqWzZ4U+w@mail.gmail.com> <d32ade7b56bf4651952659307c08893b@usma1ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com> <CANatvzwHtCn8rLB8npf3i7PGyYZhVDRd2uojh5hv3uxtFPEsSA@mail.gmail.com> <58447D8E-782C-431C-8FC3-71124B10A047@trammell.ch> <CACpbDcdfF9w3qqrH1eB0sGU_4vheD9aMP5EXnp1o3Y19N19NUg@mail.gmail.com> <e8b4931a-3931-5b8d-8dad-3ca1939d5542@huitema.net> <CAKcm_gPaj3o-VTdA_0+Kk+nTcVJrYcs_BMyOiDGXKub3gB=GLg@mail.gmail.com> <MWHPR21MB063869878060E850137210FEB6820@MWHPR21MB0638.namprd21.prod.outlook.com> <CABkgnnWLnKYeein9ptdCOkVhMq13M1HLxubHugOaybhMQTnkOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABkgnnWLnKYeein9ptdCOkVhMq13M1HLxubHugOaybhMQTnkOA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:80e8:7::316]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; MWHPR21MB0797; 7:9pYlYWEbNAjVaVTnMkN1idATSNpOGD64JcqZBeebgSz0bjqu1wG893MfY6TvI4I5jue9hfWc9/wtlD58sREC1M4K3rdPjl59rNwg3vABMvPm4ryNFqQwxzvvjwoyW/+nREotp5lI8p8HHfo82LXaO2KR/M1zPWqJNLDWM7VCCC/Emg7xY4pkljfYYsoxiKOdKjIPuzUN1uuqNsqQiCNnGyEy7/xydd9jiOzu3hhU7w4yxvSIZ2s80aRsmmRYt0UG; 20:NsN3m6ZZyaliBQ0JIuHzfaWrjhphZbov0MeCVE+nuWTYCHHhwsdvX/0O+Jfge6Z0h9jzSQgnIrF8zusDwEyEafPPonUnWORt4NP64uiiGyYfiRqZRup1HEx/bcF4M4ttA/Dxb7rTOLEJVDYZFZHq+xc8LJhRa7T2iINFtIGVmJk=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7193020); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0797;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: MWHPR21MB0797:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=pravb@microsoft.com;
x-ld-processed: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47,ExtAddr
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <MWHPR21MB07976F3296C0BB40702D0188B6810@MWHPR21MB0797.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(28532068793085)(89211679590171)(85827821059158)(211936372134217)(100405760836317)(153496737603132)(228905959029699);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3231254)(2018427008)(944501410)(52105095)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041310)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:MWHPR21MB0797; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:MWHPR21MB0797;
x-forefront-prvs: 06592CCE58
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(396003)(366004)(39380400002)(39860400002)(346002)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(99286004)(6916009)(74316002)(93886005)(446003)(6116002)(81166006)(81156014)(102836004)(10090500001)(59450400001)(86612001)(7696005)(97736004)(11346002)(33656002)(476003)(53546011)(486006)(6506007)(39060400002)(86362001)(5660300001)(4326008)(5250100002)(6246003)(8676002)(7736002)(305945005)(7416002)(53936002)(8936002)(14454004)(22452003)(316002)(8990500004)(55016002)(54906003)(2900100001)(105586002)(106356001)(478600001)(3280700002)(25786009)(68736007)(10290500003)(46003)(6436002)(186003)(9686003)(3660700001)(229853002)(76176011)(2906002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:MWHPR21MB0797; H:MWHPR21MB0638.namprd21.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: RSuKiZJ4m7pH/a6TM8rp5aCw5Yo7byukY+6J1smF9uy6V25SuTwzsKnZuegShcOiR1WfCl1P2bpuf0HIcTmyDaekhP43nlGVI5FVeyuyzliXglWttRdeJpdwHJhtil7LqyxeMSj2N4LeZU066A294868PFBwO5mC8KaNr7y1VVV0YP5V2EvAuv78ik2ZoKvN
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: 36342167-aef5-4219-33cc-08d5aefaff36
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 36342167-aef5-4219-33cc-08d5aefaff36
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 May 2018 00:32:18.8401 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: MWHPR21MB0797
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/KZ6srTBPvUSmzCjbjcFI_aNwi-A>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 00:32:23 -0000

What are the examples of issues that have a dependency on PNE? This is a transform that is applied post constructing the packet and then before decryption on receive, so I was assuming its very decoupled from the core protocol and could be added at the end. If any part of the protocol adds a dependency on PNE, then it’s a cause for concern because it precludes the no-op transform for datacenter option. So stating any such dependencies is important IMO. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Thomson [mailto:martin.thomson@gmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2018 4:49 PM
To: Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb@microsoft.com>
Cc: Ian Swett <ianswett@google.com>; huitema <huitema@huitema.net>; Jana Iyengar <jri.ietf@gmail.com>; Lubashev, Igor <ilubashe@akamai.com>; Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>; Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be>; Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>; Erik Kline <ek@google.com>; IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>; Deval, Manasi <manasi.deval@intel.com>; Kazuho Oku <kazuhooku@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Getting to consensus on packet number encryption

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 7:55 AM, Praveen Balasubramanian <pravb=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> Also, what is the urgency behind getting PNE adopted – is it blocking 
> progress on interop or other issues?

Yes.  There are a considerable number of issues backing up behind this now.