Re: Removing packet number gaps

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Tue, 02 January 2018 23:03 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEB912D811 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:03:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nG0oxeIm91Gv for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22f.google.com (mail-oi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E671200C1 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:03:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f69so34200743oig.10 for <quic@ietf.org>; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:03:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NH6j4jAu312zqXoHXlQxtMZ1NsDj9qENW9b7Rf5Z3vE=; b=KubOxD0sJwdFk+wCgg6i6kgDxRfpxfZWNLIHzuikBHi++UQgaXDXwvCp3BUKurK4rx ajG11iEnuXbM9WX1oLLMYptLl8TdwCjADp+8ibJfhN/vS3VWXcLPkOaMAZOm0LKoaMbo SZQ05hH79E36Fs6zlEXXke3IIEaL64Gt+W0GJRS3IfK6RgEIUOWdOeZk0dBcfGAWEpma 1Nqn8QDHQKURyzO/p68b6H4YmN8lZacGb5CEK7SMYA2mqHvd/J4fvJ/Bc5LN3OUAe+F0 c3iQScszL7NA9GmsRy3OEI/8/UQOmZXGvQRyE6y2eUe6Qf89TV2FgSqWE/jHyoj66m5a fdoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NH6j4jAu312zqXoHXlQxtMZ1NsDj9qENW9b7Rf5Z3vE=; b=pUQTvHQqiBSLSpiRuDcDRtyPrAG0G5JZ0QiXEKsRwckki85acFxyFfYCtzu8JA5T/9 X/1Q3kwyWs5egyGC14syio4PIUAAZEVTFdf0IQ3yR6OtgBswimcKrsjVy+kaMhtYDaNr SQhI4SMF5EeS/BtcE+6Nfi2xNCEsVgbVxPmmm7ta/f7tSLpqsTy4wrZIq6UgBKGOEHRy rMM65y5Nruo/EfdB34GMmgJ7EOBmOTHRQnRTr5KPTVhkquhU39qVDm/qwhXhVrbESlUt FY0QXFDlMFsVTi36REDauYzzFzkT67SRoJiswQN4hScbcI34Nz98plM7WeMHfwzUPr0H DgRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKJbLkfYNI9OMIio85dH04aolySPl4W79X7hE4LADhwbOpp3cGT 8CWW4Bum5jY1tsPDzSREx2svjvcpK2/c4GixJvE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot0Cv8/fua33XBvi7GJ6HzqMaAjspj9r98X+NhLpgssmpHUBQa74SfyYH8drprR2WFIurLzaI6vAugUerwKYEA=
X-Received: by 10.202.48.8 with SMTP id w8mr31440490oiw.284.1514934196485; Tue, 02 Jan 2018 15:03:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.46.182 with HTTP; Tue, 2 Jan 2018 15:03:15 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAAZdMac_HjK+R-0_8i9GDvO_QjeRjciE+=ZharpP697NJYDc-g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABkgnnW89B+5Qo0u_+Wr5K0wCRZ3Wp-+CTWJbHRGGwD06hn-zw@mail.gmail.com> <CAAZdMac_HjK+R-0_8i9GDvO_QjeRjciE+=ZharpP697NJYDc-g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2018 10:03:15 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnVJduSvaJz4vETfF81LGXgMpk+yRx=iM+PL5KeTeSFjXA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Removing packet number gaps
To: Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv@google.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/L5PIAeED3-wDl9Ou6qS39xdlOQQ>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2018 23:03:19 -0000

On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 1:43 AM, Victor Vasiliev <vasilvv@google.com> wrote:
> Why not just have different gaps for the client and the server?

That fixes only that issue, and there have been several other issues
identified.  They are each on their own relatively minor, but together
I'd say that a more principled change is justified.