Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension
Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> Mon, 04 October 2021 21:52 UTC
Return-Path: <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6443A0C0C;
Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:52:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.847
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.847 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1,
FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id FgB2dWX8dV8m; Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:52:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52f.google.com (mail-ed1-x52f.google.com
[IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52f])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE3023A0BF0;
Mon, 4 Oct 2021 14:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id r18so70261252edv.12;
Mon, 04 Oct 2021 14:52:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112;
h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to
:cc; bh=dxr5cn14+q+myywl+DN8l9xA57oEr8sEsGlxOWRx/7s=;
b=okmwBsvib8ZCzf9ofjju+zouELojUd+BJk8wQDzSLTXr5vzJpdQ92U/Lg2IR45JJBg
BbLjv/Vlsgk4P9rbukXjiYXiW+5bMOVk8w10aFY05GinYs8n0RvYqVpdPxAQbY+MUVqS
KOr+5lBAFRbRQjDnvBJbDvbpuE4JE6QN2LZyQtmnZJaVfAqbM16nZaWQfwle9zSUMPMu
zoNb8O1kkPySDEcnGzC+3XWESLQaCd94MdCKaBXiMtBy7wdVnjiWfDycghTs/ZgokPqS
dcfebaH2FtwLP+2ddO0KSDP9H7YNqlmB/TuDguYq/cN65VbxdnE+4/K1Izg6oYZaCL40
z93Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date
:message-id:subject:to:cc;
bh=dxr5cn14+q+myywl+DN8l9xA57oEr8sEsGlxOWRx/7s=;
b=3n3ZUPKTyHueZ92h8aQsu2CdOhqbjuYv9kVCCX0zQsOqiho5rJrRtQnK5GozBL9oQM
Y9detYdqm3Pagq0kUjaYb7QWw8U+Y4mlaXNUId6LG6OdZ2G7ChY7ql502Dn2iH7GYJpC
3q34KV7ehcHi7G/DIngAfwVhOtiM7BYXavWlkS3zYwiYiU30odw3NCrZwPbFRbpramoG
V6GY18JgA74yuPCyHU/Yx5LI4Ry7B7PzDAsnMsA+24yK1a8EM5YTvBGC4EM/7UzqdEMg
+nWh0Z7SxKNM+T8lL6evde90suxE+aVy2H2chpX/jppH5yqLocWG7yUxFbG5aKP0ooDA
xQOg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531yh7XS5eKAP1hXOru6ZWnvO1o9M/d8uxx+5tOHnXwqmR2OuB60
DshJTPT9XDMv2y/Gm4sc5CfVfl9jd9lPE6Fo/mXRwAkEElQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwCLOdMZwlfGKK8xXfPxU167WVP2cRatLXwyGflm6gTVRs5N+jwR4Z+eeNmLOaOH3IQbMT7J4zuDAA0etZHw1A=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:784:: with SMTP id
d4mr21391480edy.116.1633384356719;
Mon, 04 Oct 2021 14:52:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CALGR9oaZ4L_yJPhm11Gym8Rxc0nq6H=mCpLGsH_eMGVHer0uEA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKKJt-eDmpNX4EE73s0nm0X8rrXXz1GpEup22Zfu4KDYVsmRmA@mail.gmail.com>
<CALGR9obyy0gmWrnmzrWaM-Cjgp1ofNTnN7Y+QbwU2u37mZU_ig@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKKJt-enVHks1F-yvh9_bEKkP0znY+5m-hjVpS_sR7A5SNsFiw@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPDSy+5k7xO-UEBq7eTg1nTzsTx6-=kPqMVjNDoAbUSKa3-ipQ@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKKJt-dG9inej0GU0ZWHJBORgzz35870Dhbm0EWQjjaFY7ig0g@mail.gmail.com>
<CAPDSy+7CPrPwkOj5f8RJ+SoeTCt04_udiK8Wdbg-WY1MiL7RwA@mail.gmail.com>
<CAKKJt-fXLdEUu3b1D1xN-E2pE3NWV87+QKAr0drKcpvZdaUvUg@mail.gmail.com>
<CAM4esxTAOVmNCR+2886fgs4jv3_tbs5qXzJmuqFL6kfnjhpPmA@mail.gmail.com>
<CALGR9oYNkd9b5_M9rXrRd35NaoMeLTpsjX9ztS9ka9670B4umg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALGR9oYNkd9b5_M9rXrRd35NaoMeLTpsjX9ztS9ka9670B4umg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2021 22:52:25 +0100
Message-ID: <CALGR9ob5jxS19vuavHGEwctvBc948wSrnyv1WLT3W5csFLdfsA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension
To: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Cc: QUIC WG Chairs <quic-chairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005d308505cd8dee56"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/LZFU_YTZlxCBRYaeiuPfrpBpWFc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>,
<mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>,
<mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2021 21:52:44 -0000
On Mon, Oct 4, 2021 at 10:50 PM Lucas Pardue <lucaspardue.24.7@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello all, > > Thank you to everyone that provided feedback. The editors incorporated a > few editorial changes to address comments and cut an 05 draft [1]. I > noticed a couple of IANA-related nits during my shepherd review writeup > [2][3]. We’ll get these fixed up in a new revision and start the ball > rolling on progressing the document to the IESG. > Whoops, the link to the 05 draft was wrong; it should be the adopted document [1] (not the pre-adoption I-D!). Apologies. [1] - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-quic-datagram/05/
- WGLC for Datagram Extension Lucas Pardue
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Eliot Lear
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Paul Vixie
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Martin Thomson
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Tommy Pauly
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Christian Huitema
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Eliot Lear
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Ian Swett
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Eliot Lear
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Lucas Pardue
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Christian Huitema
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension David Schinazi
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension David Schinazi
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Spencer Dawkins at IETF
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Martin Duke
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Lucas Pardue
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Lucas Pardue
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Tommy Pauly
- Re: WGLC for Datagram Extension Mirja Kuehlewind