IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Implicitly opened streams and exposing stream IDs

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Mon, 02 April 2018 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B473E127010 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:48:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id By53Cra_Fyfv for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 662E1126B72 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Apr 2018 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id o64so15824795qkl.7 for <quic@ietf.org>; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 10:48:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DmmoNWUKXXGHYh8DlsAR5ETwa72MCKx8ENGFhb/BKUY=; b=kzUTc0coje8wT22hLDlS7arbuoltRzv5OFdfR1Xw9Ca+PCSMcFtN2QaX2BylZfV/5r dRgW7B1sibHAsf5Gu/J42Lfxv2BVb8zHM3fPralTtnAFBlVh6PN/ypeNS5x6AVSJQPIM LWJ+Q/ar54mx02BndSOawUC3oB8hiZvV5Ftxx2Ol264mPnfNlRCLWb9nJTIbeLDzwxV6 wQ2ERrHhJy3egswmPfvktodl0Zae/Qx4GLw5u+kLIl8RbW0hkDuAqLh5fYpe6yU+k7Vl OaDqE7bnGRHCNRHklN/k/5+YmuCkS6wELalSprXoOPFJCGTCX4tncFkAZ2v4P+8U42Do czZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=DmmoNWUKXXGHYh8DlsAR5ETwa72MCKx8ENGFhb/BKUY=; b=M/8hWyGSYNc34GEHIEIEiGO9m6GZf0ZjqEhXYTOQ7gMfHd06kc33weuoMighr62IsK f8QxgPOhvmXVtL5754PutioJLYfGiql3hKT4ohuPfdv0xOo7O3A6R9FS9yrnUpPXnjMl ZJ00/hSZpnH7qUl1XhjSEYrqU9YRP2epUcgln204tEm4xZDkHFFqLGP8iazXDBv1ijg6 ZZahcP9AUvkb7RUERnMTakRRb/s6C28PdKlAF4eRApIOJzfRqVoB+HBsgkUt1RKD9Aw2 5MxWLN4+fP3kfJvQ9Bg8eJmZYFZKdZKCGlTjv6xudDw1M93C/mOnroyrzJwJFY1Nsvxl XhIA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tC5736RdWzvMQOcH1kL/K8Sr6l0SOQbb0C9lxiBq42CqxgIlp/O NKfXiugxvyLapbdpSkjXeDRVKA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/l/el7oVqtRNGmkoVVUnkGjPts1eHKq6eKHdDl6g4kUXiYj7LQrB9L+En+ptRuNcbCdnKBJw==
X-Received: by 10.55.214.211 with SMTP id p80mr14232613qkl.1.1522691295479; Mon, 02 Apr 2018 10:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-2f1636b6.static.optonline.net. [47.22.54.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f6sm648547qth.44.2018.04.02.10.48.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Apr 2018 10:48:14 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 13:48:11 -0400
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>
Cc: QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Implicitly opened streams and exposing stream IDs
Message-ID: <20180402174810.GA2015@ubuntu-dmitri>
Mail-Followup-To: Marten Seemann <martenseemann@gmail.com>, QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
References: <CAOYVs2qp3L-dTdFfBNDQT0Q=nCu+6Ew3gmF=0GMS2vVw1JfWCg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOYVs2qp3L-dTdFfBNDQT0Q=nCu+6Ew3gmF=0GMS2vVw1JfWCg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/Lq__0zo45mHNBJZUOKaGEhNivz8>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 17:48:19 -0000

On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 11:43:23AM +0000, Marten Seemann wrote:
> In this case, after accepting a stream, we first have to check the stream
> ID, since there's no guarantee if the control stream will actually be
> received first.
> 
> For this stream mapping, it seems like the removal of implicitly opened
> streams implies that QUIC has to expose stream IDs to the application
> layer.

I don't see a problem with that -- HTTP is the application layer, and
the draft specifies that streams 2 and 3 are the control streams.

> I'm not sure if this was intended when making the change, especially
> since we're considering to change HQ such that it doesn't rely on QUIC
> stream IDs any more.

Are you referring to a specific pull request or an issue on GitHub?
(I must have missed it.)

  - Dmitri.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email