Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 23 June 2024 07:38 UTC
Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC6AC14F69E for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="rnJ/i/1X"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="cuGHMGgX"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xDfrbrjE26Mm for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wfout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.148]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E81E7C14F615 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D1A1C0019F for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:38:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:38:33 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1719128312; x=1719214712; bh=7jjhe/xw5squR3ry6AUjwe86/of52PNWDf8 Q+7NHcXw=; b=rnJ/i/1X6944jwWJqks2C43s/PuS1OvlylviNSFw+zEYoo6kM+6 FmvoitAjqPUluv0oTfj8oYIFxXQG+LSBf4HcVMrVJydUZ0xTlOsrjqIJfeuPu2bJ l4RFcRfj565/nmSdlmf09hjhTS4FoqkAXX4R12YDCFxL2ORGUwvgwrHTVpwiJWAy mdbZaZrjWARwEP41IE3XR4k7BxVutEZxIxMD24IOdV3muRI0pBK7irX4TRUFoqpd YfXxGY5piRuEgq9Bhdj/76X+fpR/D1JFiX+RpFGEXnicXOlH8dUhYBcKxX8cDoL/ rq4bO0L3UQ+OyJDtpz8XMfWROLyD/hquSXQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1719128312; x= 1719214712; bh=7jjhe/xw5squR3ry6AUjwe86/of52PNWDf8Q+7NHcXw=; b=c uGHMGgX1TNNCrKUeBJvWeRVkjGCZAZzgkmJjBUNYOracmbOB9Q6BqCXBw/FCREYA Px+OlU+mYo0/eZHcI1fyP4/Yc71NMZW22+QslkzMJAPRW2qN5yVBvPArxXOIaJFH UvPguO5JfUznJW7wACsgEYiLXMrPeRQ0TKWKwL4UNRXddNPU9C3kRGTV+SwRvtMJ QuImTJTj3jD+julCjOQp/MPJYCANA+5lId8BUxHMkNUdvXHUdEsyBirkQA5F/wtu 6SRqhBUSjn2eSyR7OqwrKDhajdQOd+zvFSDnOWdkyRcvVJItpM33tjRvz1PU4F6r +Me4cJ1FfSVggNK96MeZw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:-NB3ZpZAubyKJ8pvgMZ7bC_Ik5ttAtUIU4pPHu5uUJNhrbAc1Yo08g> <xme:-NB3ZgZgJbFmv_9NtMZlckTRecU3qdLXviNIjvfzw3YfymVK0dlOhW_z7lj5hKV8Y H1zsDIjzv79y2sYrg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:-NB3Zr-eF7L7UqfDm_Cy6mfblwY3XwbB_nZfxPQvAnjtN4BwLUBwYTkau35h>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrfeefkedgleefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucfpohcuuggrthgvuchfihgvlhguucdlgeelmdenuc fjughrpegtggfhvffusegrtddtredttdejnecuhfhrohhmpeftvghpohhsihhtohhrhicu tegtthhivhhithihucfuuhhmmhgrrhihuceuohhtuceoughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihse hmnhhothdrnhgvtheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeefvdduteejvdefkeehieevuefg fefhteetveegffekffefteffvdelheduieetnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtg homhenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedunecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpegu ohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:-NB3ZnqdpUveJkUYR2JfNQ1uUo2V7QC2DdfsyuAV1XxIcakW9tKOeA> <xmx:-NB3ZkptuzU1S9UFTNktD2eUHfoZ0RdjnQofXtjrbEAwySY_eqiAoA> <xmx:-NB3ZtSgHLLJer9KlhuUZ3NuDzTWv21TInv_aBSpFwFPuHlnllh6Fg> <xmx:-NB3ZsqDvBxxaI28xax1iPm3ICuP1GafJv3W-lWdDce7RL1jz7kKaA> <xmx:-NB3Zr0Zh9R5AYWf0jvjcH2PCJhzU615kQN92AHpXQmDSyzXLCbQkPBv>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2024 03:38:32 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============2189270802267274934=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: quic@ietf.org
Subject: Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary)
Message-Id: <20240623073837.E81E7C14F615@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 00:38:37 -0700
Message-ID-Hash: IXRMSF2RA7FMM2TXBGLYRD64ZSXORNWJ
X-Message-ID-Hash: IXRMSF2RA7FMM2TXBGLYRD64ZSXORNWJ
X-MailFrom: do_not_reply@mnot.net
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-quic.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/M0UAK3M_UqKZMZYoqEB3JnWrxYM>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:quic-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:quic-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:quic-leave@ietf.org>
Events without label "editorial" Issues ------ * quicwg/load-balancers (+1/-0/💬0) 1 issues created: - Allow the load balancer to apply certain routing strategy on DCID of Initial Packet (by thynson) https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers/issues/230 * quicwg/multipath (+0/-12/💬11) 9 issues received 11 new comments: - #381 Do we need to allow transport parameter "initial_max_path_id" to be set to 0? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/381 [design] [explicit path ID] - #371 Should the seq number space of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID be per-path or global? (2 by huitema, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/371 [design] [no-action-needed] [explicit path ID] - #340 What should an endpoint do if it receives a PATH_CHALLENGE for an path ID that it doesn't have CIDs for? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/340 [has PR] [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] - #332 Should active_connection_id_limit be per path or per connection? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/332 [design] [explicit path ID] - #328 Designing odd/even path-id, or not. (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/328 [design] [explicit path ID] - #323 Alternative to defining a bunch of MP-specific frames (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/323 [no-action-needed] - #321 Static path IDs? (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/321 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] - #319 What if a client falsely links two paths using CIDs associated with the same path ID (1 by mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/319 [explicit path ID] - #313 When to CID expire if using Unique Path ID? (2 by huitema, mirjak) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/313 [has PR] [design] [explicit path ID] 12 issues closed: - What should an endpoint do if it receives a PATH_CHALLENGE for an path ID that it doesn't have CIDs for? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/340 [has PR] [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] - Should we require explicit Abandon after path time-out? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/366 [has PR] [design] - Should the seq number space of MP_NEW_CONNECTION_ID be per-path or global? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/371 [design] [no-action-needed] [explicit path ID] - Clarify how new CIDs are allocated https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/338 [has PR] [design] [explicit path ID] - Clarify how new CIDs are allocated https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/338 [has PR] [design] [explicit path ID] - Write Security Consideration section https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/301 [has PR] - Should active_connection_id_limit be per path or per connection? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/332 [design] [explicit path ID] - Designing odd/even path-id, or not. https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/328 [design] [explicit path ID] - What if a client falsely links two paths using CIDs associated with the same path ID https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/319 [explicit path ID] - Static path IDs? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/321 [design] [needs-discussion] [explicit path ID] - Alternative to defining a bunch of MP-specific frames https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/323 [no-action-needed] - Do we need to allow transport parameter "initial_max_path_id" to be set to 0? https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/issues/381 [design] [explicit path ID] Pull requests ------------- * quicwg/qlog (+0/-0/💬1) 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #417 Add extensibility for all events and official extension points (1 by rmarx) https://github.com/quicwg/qlog/pull/417 * quicwg/multipath (+3/-8/💬1) 3 pull requests submitted: - [=] Cleanup MAX_PATHS (by Yanmei-Liu) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/384 - First shot for Security Consideration (by Yanmei-Liu) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/383 - [+] Rewrite outdated examples (by Yanmei-Liu) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/382 1 pull requests received 1 new comments: - #383 First shot for Security Consideration (1 by Yanmei-Liu) https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/383 8 pull requests merged: - Rewrite the path close section to specify symmetric Abandon https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/377 - ignore or wait if no CID for path ID is available on receipt of PATH_… https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/341 [needs-discussion] - Recommendations regarding CID allocation and Path ID continuity https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/375 - Cleanup MAX_PATHS https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/372 - Rename transport parameter initial_max_paths to initial_max_path_id https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/376 - There is always a valid CID now for each path https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/374 - First shot for Security Consideration https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/383 - [=] Cleanup MAX_PATHS https://github.com/quicwg/multipath/pull/384 Repositories tracked by this digest: ----------------------------------- * https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/ops-drafts * https://github.com/quicwg/datagram * https://github.com/quicwg/load-balancers * https://github.com/quicwg/version-negotiation * https://github.com/quicwg/quic-bit-grease * https://github.com/quicwg/qlog * https://github.com/quicwg/quic-v2 * https://github.com/quicwg/multipath * https://github.com/quicwg/ack-frequency * https://github.com/quicwg/reliable-stream-reset
- Weekly github digest (QUIC Activity Summary) Repository Activity Summary Bot