Consensus call for Late-Stage documents, pre-IETF 108 edition

[Lucas Pardue <[e-mail]>]

Folks,

The following issues have proposals for resolution, and discussion so far
seems
to support consensus to accept them. Therefore, we are starting a 1-week
consensus call. If you object to a proposal, please do so on the issue or
in response to this message (changing the Subject appropriately!). Absent
any
pushback, we'll direct the editors to incorporate proposals once the call
concludes.

See <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/projects/5> for the current
state of
issues in the Late Stage process, itself defined at
<https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md>.


* #3880: How long is a validated address good for?
  The proposal is to lose with no action.

* #3875: Persistent congestion threshold is unreliable during the early
stages of a connection
  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3889>

* #3860: incorrect error code used for invalid RETIRE_CONNECTION_ID frames
  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3861>

* #3845: What does "MUST reduce" mean?
  The proposal is https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3864

* #3842: Do I need to reset congestion info when the port changes?
  The proposal is to close with no action.

* #3834: Remove amplification throttle if the server receives Initial that
echoes its high entropy SCID.
  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3924>

* #3808: Versions are for endpoints
  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3785>

* #3800: Coalescing different CIDs for same connection
  The proposal is <https://github.com/quicwg/base-drafts/pull/3930>

Cheers,
Lars, Lucas and Mark
QUIC WG Chairs