Re: Feedback from first read of QUIC/HTTP draft 08

Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com> Fri, 08 December 2017 13:01 UTC

Return-Path: <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3A15126C22 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 05:01:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id g9LVzDvYVfJV for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 05:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x232.google.com (mail-qt0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 414E4124D68 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Dec 2017 05:01:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x232.google.com with SMTP id a16so25743774qtj.3 for <quic@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 05:01:29 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=litespeedtech-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2E7nFR63roRv0RlI0aqEv16O9WjmbfEY+RIDEbcHxl0=; b=t9R9v0FEVJnC92FNCBC5u1rNogd6k3teeOuFqUt5yOWg6WHLrPE1CCyTohQnGVCiZA g4tPV2XYYUXM1/6r0ofQjio6B5XstXfj+Eb3md5gPF81uz9WZ1h6+3u4atoWiP/zS0/1 sLc0HjKbbhsilmWUskeOou5xNlMWFQUH7TysuCTXT80X03LXlIGMRJGxwazJQLDL+iBe KlJXaAt+aE+DvfdEdp/14XveDfSIWF6YsAz9iaZ+FF/OFYd+ThoK7v4Foh6UjtG4WJxU O/8GzxKEGrcZXnNseJIf4vZ1tAUvU0oE60eSItTUns6vfeI273Kt75c0LZDBWFbSAYOl HEhw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=2E7nFR63roRv0RlI0aqEv16O9WjmbfEY+RIDEbcHxl0=; b=ZQG/gZbUkoBH05iOvd+NesVt+2D73eEq96XSYXiJPWxryUXZntHiT/zxF2yZYTwyHG AAw66ZvQTk86GTtQ03FbFL9eXvWuDIujUmjvIrwjZxAuREYEZhJKziCCiB1+G/Ptnzv3 +ZL/iqv9CW0CfoDtuZHoKF57fm4vGCCplEMlnN35pExvz0pCwR6p9lNvdoz3Sh0GiwF4 oaDeaZNahg9LPXncMwIbNnlyWiiMe/ono8ehp2HP5x7nHu8VhwHP1JGD0EJfgCl5ltp5 Oy7G5lUiAQb2cg5zbXdAMjqbmzHcK6tPoInQN+5QAEjkrez7UFJ5D5dItsKp+aHRbZ7w WZiw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLCxLQ/KGfiHoB0vPbgp1NZzPPxfOnVzAc6VvO+cKEwrE9El0vX D/jRmmynmero47x/YYox+9tq+z2Z
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaqKwDsOoxX/UcIt5mRkIf6pb7Gv94k+nBNcZ3a1o0bgRvn/o/KSszKtT3ZJMQc8h0iNYa5kQ==
X-Received: by 10.200.46.167 with SMTP id h36mr15510758qta.267.1512738088304; Fri, 08 Dec 2017 05:01:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ubuntu-dmitri (ool-2f1636b6.static.optonline.net. [47.22.54.182]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g8sm4342911qth.68.2017.12.08.05.01.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 08 Dec 2017 05:01:27 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 08:01:23 -0500
From: Dmitri Tikhonov <dtikhonov@litespeedtech.com>
To: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>
Cc: IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Feedback from first read of QUIC/HTTP draft 08
Message-ID: <20171208130122.GA8878@ubuntu-dmitri>
Mail-Followup-To: Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen <mikkelfj@gmail.com>, IETF QUIC WG <quic@ietf.org>
References: <CAN1APdcNRyJJToL5Ym8T9v2svCfiJLekqmbbEzkVNdMbGZUfAQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAN1APdcNRyJJToL5Ym8T9v2svCfiJLekqmbbEzkVNdMbGZUfAQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/N1C8oIsipNj3pLbokGCw68Uxhkc>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2017 13:01:31 -0000

On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 12:45:30AM -0800, Mikkel Fahnøe Jørgensen wrote:
>    8. The HPACK, to be replaced, doc is hard to parse

There are three HPACK replacement proposals (neither of which is
referenced by [draft-ietf-quic-http-08]): QPACK, QCRAM, and QMIN.
Which one are you referring to?

>    and it doesn't sound like it is as complicated as it reads.
>    Hopefully a future QUIC equivalent would be a bit easier to
>    digest.

If you offered some specific examples, I think it would be appreciated:
we want to make the documents comprehensible on the first read.

  - Dmitri.