Re: HTTP Delays

[Martin Duke <[e-mail]>]

To summarize, I think there are three options:
1) Don't publish any RFCs until httpbis-semantics and httpbis-cache are in
the RFC Ed queue
2) Publish QUIC ASAP without HTTP/3, and suggest that deployed endpoints
run QUICv1 with ALPN h3-29/32/34 or whatever
3) Publish QUIC and HTTP/3 ASAP with a downref, allow ALPN h3 to deploy,
and hope nothing important changes in the httpbis docs.

The second sounds cleanest to me, but I can certainly be persuaded of the
others.

On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 2:41 AM Magnus Westerlund <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> My current judgment is also that this will result in that the HTTP/3 and
> QPACK
> specs will end up in missref due to these references. I don't think there
> is an
> good option. The new HTTP specs are substantial rewrites so going back to
> RFC
> 723x doesn't make sense here, and likely include substantial amount of
> work.
>
> I do think the WG do need to be clear if the message is to stay with the
> the
> prelimenary versions, if that is h-29 or declare a h-34 based on the
> forthcoming
> -34 versions and what to do with salts and keys.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus
>
>