IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: arguments for Edge

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Sun, 27 June 2021 11:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: quic@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DA73A2572 for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 04:10:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9tA_nxiko_5u for <quic@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 04:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2d.google.com (mail-io1-xd2d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FA483A2574 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 04:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2d.google.com with SMTP id f21so2943266ioh.13 for <quic@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 04:10:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ikAOJE+Fl0YJ6Ac949ZqJMrm7jtxnKSC3KdP31rc2JY=; b=u5cOeFobxfNm4J+5MhBBkP3Vwex/okfudG5S9f5rsu+5E+9+hrtFG3Z6cRa7TDv/or 5qGp0Wx8UhcLg/RLCygSxJOs1U1kC6swwFNIhzUUNnXAEkJuv0XytEmiiQFST2dbirsd dEEVffDVSNwCw0ktzDO7aM0na5GZ+hn5c1jvvc6ApF2rWU4yxHRHwwX1n4EUqC34Wut9 EqjBl5vwRhHBsJxWT83wYkIv8KsgdkTBCrRxb+bP3TFg0oNMXdYE/osypmL1+DYXTXCq HqhTEEHmrYaBkBF1ycEeUFFlWL5/tR9I49zYRANzP0mpV7KWWoXk7IfdhdS8Cd3EByEs s24w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ikAOJE+Fl0YJ6Ac949ZqJMrm7jtxnKSC3KdP31rc2JY=; b=q/9ds+Km7RZxwxP5eKqphykTE48q2U9aJQMYEVUhSLiMEWplBF6S37/DHqhacKbvAA JXkdQdM8S3FV2E+H1xAdIldVU47lraUIdGHn/CjeWjjP7uWzxfpp99gNn8CV2POnHMpK aytBmkBJt9TB/d8/kak/NOWhlm1q+V84Lt27x+QjWHNZ6520RtyUiJI2E/6pNPCzTkuT t0yVxrMUT6WCFKL5zMjM4Vb9tiVLfmD6GqCAtM71c00QubrHQ/1sWwXVHqxXxZmZrOvL dTs4iYR3D57/3o6Q39lOKOpY+BXTl6mBiGPSccCcRqjHvHNn/e7QNg+zLNMFfmyTdcpT OgZQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530rm8XdY7DYsQAbDNuVqkZhqISDtvLKLtrv/5E6pfoYiWVysjFM Bxd0755Zy50fJ2Pwb26UTR1JYts+D0diK5wrokA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxzSl0hAZAHgVZivAv/DzNp1UMOHS5uzxrC/fRunhoidrbPFF43z9qxJiWGm+ey8BfQMMEZJ/VQGjpTqq50uIM=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:ac3:: with SMTP id m3mr8978703jab.97.1624792218156; Sun, 27 Jun 2021 04:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <5907c434e2919aba66d5f4729f39571f@tum.de> <3dbaa780606f9b0aa4bdffd01fc9287f@tum.de>
In-Reply-To: <3dbaa780606f9b0aa4bdffd01fc9287f@tum.de>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 04:10:06 -0700
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6hqaOuEcDxg4Q6GNUd_fOwNCo8zk2RVrxYas7ZY5vehw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: arguments for Edge
To: Aaron Ding <aaron.ding@tum.de>
Cc: quic@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/quic/NTkondKAy0Qn94HV_YRXCvjeVXY>
X-BeenThere: quic@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Main mailing list of the IETF QUIC working group <quic.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/quic/>
List-Post: <mailto:quic@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/quic>, <mailto:quic-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2021 11:10:25 -0000

I think the arguments for re-invigorating the edge are stronger than ever.

But first up, we gotta fix the bufferbloat everywhere.

On Sun, Jun 27, 2021 at 2:15 AM Aaron Ding <aaron.ding@tum.de> wrote:
>
>
> Is the motive for Edge (i.e., latency) diminishing since its first
> concepts were formulated more than a decade ago?
>
> A recent work to share on "Revisiting the Arguments for Edge Computing
> Research":
> https://arxiv.org/pdf/2106.12224.pdf
>
> Aaron
>


-- 
Latest Podcast:
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:6791014284936785920/

Dave Täht CTO, TekLibre, LLC

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status